UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS

Dear Fellow Stockholders,

Our board of directors has remained steadfast in prioritizing the health and well-being of our workforce, supporting our communities, serving our customers, and positioning Freeport-McMoRan for long-term success in the midst of the global pandemic and economic uncertainty. Our global team responded to the challenges of this past year and delivered exceptional performance, outperforming all of our peers on a stockholder return basis and finishing the year as the eighth best-performing stock in the S&P 500.

Early in 2020, we proactively implemented protective health protocols throughout our global operations that followed international and local guidelines and continued to enhance those protocols throughout the year. We also took various steps to support our local host communities and indigenous neighbors to help them navigate the pandemic. Our board remains actively engaged with management in guiding these initiatives and is regularly updated on the company’s actions to address the ongoing impacts of the pandemic on our business and stakeholders.

Freeport-McMoRan also achieved significant environmental, social and governance (ESG) related milestones in 2020. We published new climate and water reports, established a 2030 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target for the Americas and committed to aligning our climate strategy and related disclosures with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). We also committed to the Copper Mark, a new comprehensive industry-specific assurance framework that promotes responsible production practices in alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We continue to focus on human capital management, with progress made on strengthening inclusion and diversity initiatives across our workforce. Finally, we have committed to reporting in line with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) framework. Our board understands that robust ESG practices, transparency, and reporting are integral components of producing sustainable long-term value for all of our stakeholders.

In February 2021, in connection with the retirement of our non-executive chairman, Gerald J. Ford, our board elected our chief executive officer, Richard C. Adkerson, as chairman, and me as lead independent director. We are immensely thankful to Mr. Ford for his leadership, legacy of service, and leading independent oversight by our board. Mr. Adkerson has decades of industry and operational experience, a vision for the company’s long-term strategy, connectivity to our global workforce, and strong relationships with our stakeholders. My fellow independent directors and I will continue to provide Mr. Adkerson and the rest of the management team with independent counsel and oversight to drive sustainable, long-term value creation.

As part of our ongoing review of our board’s composition, we remained committed to recruiting additional independent directors who would expand our board’s skillsets, perspectives and capabilities. Following a robust search process, we recently welcomed David P. Abney, retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc., and Robert W. Dudley, retired Group Chief Executive of BP, p.l.c., to our board. Messrs. Abney and Dudley both bring exceptional track records of leadership and experience in a wide range of matters relevant to the company, including global business, corporate governance, and sustainability. The addition of these directors is consistent with our objectives of having a board with expansive and diverse experience, a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with our global business and a focus on value and sustainability for the benefit of all stakeholders. Our director recruitment efforts are ongoing and further additions to the board are anticipated.

I look forward to continuing to engage with our stockholders as part of the company’s ongoing engagement program. I have valued the opportunities to hear your feedback on topics important to you over the past few years. On behalf of the board, of directors, thank you for your continued trust and investment and trusting us to oversee the long-term success of Freeport-McMoRan. We value this opportunity to update you onin our company’s corporate governance, executive compensation and other important matters, including key initiatives and accomplishments during 2018.

Achievement of Two Major Objectives.In recent years, our board and management team prioritized two major objectives to enhance long-term stockholder value: (1) restore our balance sheet strength and (2) reach a favorable agreement with the Indonesian government on PT Freeport Indonesia’s long-term mining rights for our significant Grasberg asset. We are pleased to report that both objectives have been achieved – culminating with completion of a positive transaction in December 2018 to provide long-term stability to our operations in Indonesia. Accomplishing these objectives has been an area of close board oversight. With critical negotiations concluded and balance sheet strength restored, our board remains engaged in the oversight of other strategic initiatives in close partnership with management.

Oversight of Environmental and Safety Risks. The board maintains an engaged corporate responsibility committee that is tasked with supporting the board’s oversight of several key areas, including environmental policy, safety and health considerations, and sustainability of areas near our operations. The corporate responsibility committee and the full board also monitor industry developments in this area to ensure that our operations are being managed to mitigate any newly identified risks.

Alignment of Pay and Performance. Our compensation committee regularly reviews the compensation program to ensure continued alignment with company strategy. The compensation committee also considers feedback from our stockholders regarding compensation structures. In 2018, we continued ourboard-led stockholder engagement program with a commitment to bring feedback to the board for consideration. This feedback and the compensation committee’s ongoing review resulted in further refinement of our long-term incentive program in 2018, which included incorporating return on investment as the primary metric of our performance share unit awards.

Board Refreshment. We remain committed to an ongoing review of the board’s composition to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure, diversity, skill sets and experience. In the past 15 months, the size of the board decreased with the passing of our colleague, Jon Madonna, and the resignation of two directors designated by Carl Icahn. With these transitions, board refreshment is a priority and the nominating and corporate governance committee is currently considering the board’s composition and potential board candidates who can contribute to the company’s success.

My fellow directors and I pledge to continue working on your behalf to ensure our sustainable long-term growth continues. We look forward to hearing your views at this year’s annual meeting and in the year to come.company.

NOTICE OF 20192021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    i

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements, which are all statements other than statements of historical facts. We caution readers that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, expected, projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that can cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those described in more detail under the heading “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (2020 Form 10-K), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. This proxy statement also contains certain financial measures that are not recognized under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, including adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), net debt and consolidated unit net cash costs. Please refer to Annex A to this proxy statement for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and other information regarding our calculations for net debt and consolidated unit net cash costs.

ii    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement

Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement3

Our director nominees represent a range of tenures and overall experience, which contributes to a variety of perspectives and facilitates transition of institutional knowledge from longer-serving members to newer members of our board. We believe this balanced composition is in the best interest of our company and our stockholders, as our industry and strategic initiatives often have prolonged lifecycles, and it is therefore helpful to have seasoned directors who are familiar with our company and can draw on past experience and expertise balanced with newer directors who bring fresh perspectives. Our governance committee remains committed to an ongoing review of the board’s composition to ensure that we continue to have the right mix of skills, background, diversity and tenure to position the company for long-term success.

The above statistics are calculated as of the record date, April 12, 2021 with respect to our director nominees.

Diverse Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
✓		Senior Leadership Experience		✓		Natural Resources, Mining, Metals Industry Experience		✓		International Business/Global Affairs
✓		Sustainability		✓		Operational Management/Risk Management		✓		Accounting/Financial Expertise
✓		Government, Legal and/or Regulatory Compliance		✓		Public Company Board Experience		✓		Capital Markets/Banking

Executive Compensation Highlights (page 28)

• In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our two most senior executives voluntarily agreed to reduce their 2020 base salaries by 25% and further agreed to take 90% of the reduced salaries in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) instead of cash to help preserve liquidity. • A majority of our executive officers’ target direct compensation is at risk and requires measurable performance and increases in stock price under our annual incentive (AIP) and long-term incentive (LTIP) programs. o   No adjustments to our AIP or LTIP performance targets or results; AIP awards for 2020 earned at 143.9% of target based on performance metrics, but management recommended and the compensation committee exercised negative discretion to reduce the payouts to 125% of target in part due to our COVID-19 related cost reductions.
o   Payout of 2018 performance share units (PSUs) in early 2021 at 116% of target based on achievement of long-term performance metrics. • AIP uses financial, operational and ESG metrics to measure performance. • 100% of our CEO’s 2020 LTIP award was performance-based: 67% PSUs (with payout based on achievement of return on investment (ROI) metrics with a total stockholder return (TSR) modifier) and 33% stock options (with ultimate value dependent on increases in stock price).

4    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement

SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTSSTAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We maintain an ongoing, proactive and expansive stakeholder engagement program. Direct engagement with our stockholders is a critical pillar of this program. Our sustainableboard and management have a history of engaging with stockholders and incorporating feedback into their decision-making processes. We also maintain dialogue and gather input from our broader group of stakeholders including governmental organizations and NGOs, customers and the communities in which we operate. The board’s corporate responsibility committee and management’s sustainability development program is integral toleadership team provide oversight of our business objectives and facilitates our ability to deliver positive, long-term contributions to society. Our program was founded to promote and enhance the following objectives:engagement efforts.

6    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement

SUSTAINABILITY Freeport-McMoRan is a leading responsible copper producer. We are committed to meeting the highest standards of environmental stewardship across our operations, respecting human rights in all of our business practices and prioritizing the health, safety and well-being of our workforce and host communities where we operate. We recognize that the long-term success of the company and sustainable value creation are dependent on effective management, integration and governance of key ESG matters. Our focus on responsible copper production is visible in everything we do, driven by our core values of safety, respect, integrity, excellence and commitment. Our values represent who we are and how we work – everyone, everywhere and every day.
By supplying responsibly produced copper, we are proud to be a positive contributor to the world well beyond our own operational boundaries.

Board andCorporate Responsibility Committee Oversight and Management of Sustainability

The corporate responsibility committee assists(CRC), on behalf of the board, in fulfilling itsis responsible for providing advice, recommendations and oversight responsibilitiesto the company’s management team on environmental and social matters. The CRC regularly reviews the effectiveness of management’s strategies, programs and policy implementation with respect to the management of risks associated with our safety and health, policiesresponsible production frameworks, tailings management and programs, environmental policystewardship, climate change, water stewardship, biodiversity, waste management, human capital management (including inclusion and programs,diversity initiatives), human rights, policy and practices, community and public health programs, community policy and practices, governmental and stakeholder relations, sustainable development programs, programs to evaluatesocial performance and address climate-related impacts and opportunities, charitable contributions,Indigenous Peoples, responsible sourcing, and political activity and spending practices. During 2018, management engaged2020, the CRC met three times and a member of the CRC participated directly in several stockholder engagement calls to solicit feedback on our sustainability programs and practices. Additionally, the audit committee and the governance committee conduct oversight of certain key ESG matters. The audit committee conducts oversight of global compliance, information technology security and cybersecurity. The governance committee conducts oversight of corporate governance practices and procedures.

Our chairman and CEO has ultimate responsibility for the company’s sustainability performance. Executive officers are held accountable for the company’s sustainability performance through the company’s performance-based AIP. In 2020, ESG metrics collectively accounted for 25% of the AIP (15% safety and 10% sustainability). See “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Principal Components of Executive Compensation” for more information.

Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement7

2020 Sustainability Highlights

Sustainability Program Aligns with International Best Practices

In 2020, we continued to focus on enhanced ESG transparency with the chairpublication of an expanded sustainability report including more comprehensive five-year data and our inaugural climate report, a new water report and a new Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Step 5 Report. We further enhanced our disclosures by preparing our 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability in accordance with the SASB standards for our industry, as well as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards Core option and the G4 Mining and Metals Sector supplement. We also accelerated the timing of the corporate responsibility committeepublication of our 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability to align with the publication of this proxy statement to provide the latest available ESG disclosures. Our 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability, which we have published annually since 2001, is available on our website at various times,fcx.com under “Sustainability – Reports and Documents” and is independently assured. Our 2019 Climate Report, 2019 Water Report and OECD Step 5 Reports are also available on our website at fcx.com under “Sustainability – Reports and Documents.”

In 2020, we also committed to the corporate responsibility committee received various reportsCopper Mark, a new, comprehensive assurance framework that promotes responsible production practices and considered numerous items with a particular focus ondemonstrates the safety reporting processes atindustry’s contribution to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. It is the first and only framework developed specifically for the copper industry and enables each site to demonstrate to customers, investors, final manufacturers and other stakeholders their responsible production performance. To date, six of our sites have been validated by the Copper Mark including our Cerro Verde mine in Peru, El Abra mine in Chile, Atlantic Copper smelter and refinery in Spain, Morenci mine and Miami smelter in Arizona and El Paso refinery in Texas. We have plans to validate all of our copper producing sites against the Copper Mark requirements.

8    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement

Climate Change

In 2020, we published our inaugural climate report, established our first GHG emissions reduction target for the Americas and committed to aligning our climate strategy and related disclosures with the recommendations of the TCFD in the coming years. We formalized our climate change strategy, founded on three pillars:

Later in 2021, we plan to publish an updated climate report that will include a summary of the results and recommendations from our global climate scenario analysis, which is currently underway and in line with recommendations from TCFD. We also plan to provide an update on the progress on our climate strategy. To learn more about our climate change efforts in 2020 and our plans moving forward, please refer to our 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability and our 2019 Climate Report available on our website at fcx.com under “Sustainability – Reports and Documents.”

Inclusion and Diversity

To support our workforce transformation, engagement and ongoing talent development, we strengthened our Human Resources department in 2020 and established two new positions: chief human resources officer and vice president – transformation and organizational development, which maintain specific responsibility for inclusion and diversity efforts.

We are committed to fostering a culture that is inclusive and representative of the human rights impact assessments conductedcommunities where we operate. In 2020, as part of our broader organizational development efforts, we made several advancements aimed at refocusing and strengthening the governance, resourcing and strategic direction of our operationsglobal inclusion and diversity program, including the following:

As part of ongoing efforts to support our understanding, tracking, and transparency of inclusion and diversity within our employee population, we disclosed additional metrics in Peruour 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability. Our 2020 consolidated North America diversity metrics are in line with the categories set forth by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

To learn more about our inclusion and New Mexico, environmental matters at our Indonesia operations,diversity efforts in 2020 and our political activityplans moving forward, please refer to our 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability available on our website at fcx.com under “Sustainability – Reports and spending practices.Documents.”

Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    79

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines; Principles of Business Conduct

We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our stockholders, promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders, strengthens board and management accountability, and engenders public trust in our company. Our corporate governance guidelines, along with the charters of our principal board committees, provide the framework for the governance of our company and reflect the board’s commitment to monitor the effectiveness of policy and decision-making at both the board and management levels.

We are committed to the highest level of ethical and legal conduct in all of our business operations. Our principles of business conduct highlight the core values on which our company has built its reputation – safety, respect, integrity, excellence and commitment. Our principles of business conduct provide guidance for the application of these values to our business and define the expected behavior of all of our employees and our board.

OurBoard Leadership Structure

The board believes it is important to retain flexibility to determine its leadership structure based on the composition of the board, management team and business conditions at the time, recognizing that the needs and opportunities of the company may change over time. While our by-laws and corporate governance guidelines do not require our chairman of the board and principlesCEO positions to be separate, these positions were separate at our company from 2003 until recently. In February of business conduct are available2021, our former non-executive chairman, Mr. Ford, announced his intention to retire as a director effective upon the expiration of his current term atfcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance – Governance Documents” the annual meeting. In connection with his announcement, Mr. Ford also stepped down from his position as non-executive chairman of the board.

With Mr. Ford’s planned retirement, our board considered the relative benefits of combining the chairman and are availableCEO positions versus retaining separate roles with an independent chairman in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Amendments to or waiversour current environment. After considering the perspectives of our principles of business conduct granted to anyindependent directors, views of our stockholders and recent governance trends, the board unanimously concluded that Richard C. Adkerson, our current CEO and a recognized business leader in the mining industry, would be best positioned to serve as our chairman of the board with Dustan E. McCoy serving as lead independent director, with clearly defined responsibilities.

Mr. Adkerson brings to the chairman role his decades of industry and operational experience, vision for the company’s long-term strategy, connectivity to our global workforce and strong relationships with our stakeholders, all of which are important in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the continued ramp-up of underground mining at PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI) and the prioritization of the company’s long-term development opportunities during 2021. Mr. McCoy’s appointment as lead independent director enhances the strong independent oversight function of the board, which is composed exclusively of independent directors or(other than Mr. Adkerson), all of whom are highly qualified and experienced.

The board believes this governance structure provides an effective balance between strong company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors and is in the best interest of the company and its stockholders at this time.

(*) At all times during which the chairman of the board is an executive officerschairman, these responsibilities will be published promptly on our website.carried out with the input and concurrence of the lead independent director.

10    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement

Board Composition and Refreshment

In accordance with our corporate governance guidelines, our nominating and corporatethe governance committee reviews annually the composition and size of the board, recognizing the importance of refreshment to maintain a balance of tenure, diversity, skill sets and experience on our board. Our board currently consists of fiveeight members, fourseven of whom the board has affirmatively determined are independent. The average age of our independent directors is 66, and the average tenure of our independent directors is 10.3 years. In addition, 40% of the members of our board are women. Each of our current board membersdirectors has been nominated to stand for re-election at our 20192021 annual meeting, except for Mr. Ford who has expressed his intention to retire as a director effective upon the expiration of his current term at the annual meeting. Since 2019, we have added three new independent directors to the board.

OverIn 2019, our governance committee initiated a robust director search process in response to feedback obtained during our annual board evaluation process. To facilitate this process, the past 15 months, our boardgovernance committee engaged an independent global search firm to assist with identifying, evaluating and recruiting a diverse pool of potential director candidates. This search process has experienced departuresresulted in the appointment of three of its directors. Jon C. Madonna, a long-timenew independent director of the company, served on the board until he passed away on May 30, 2018. On March 5, 2018 and on March 12, 2019, Andrew Langham and Courtney Mather resigned from the board, respectively. Messrs. Langham and Mather were originally appointeddirectors to the board since 2019: John J. Stephens in October 2015 pursuant2019 and, most recently, David P. Abney and Robert W. Dudley in April 2021. Our two newest directors, Messrs. Abney and Dudley, are exceptional leaders with proven track records and experience in complex global business, including corporate governance, sustainability, extractives industry experience, supply chain resilience and logistics, and a wide range of other matters relevant to the company. These additions to our board are consistent with our objective to have a nominationboard with expansive and standstill agreement betweendiverse experience, a deep understanding of the companychallenges and opportunities associated with our global business and a focus on value and sustainability for the Icahn group⁽*⁾.benefit of all stakeholders. Our director recruitment efforts are ongoing with the assistance of the search firm and further additions to the board are anticipated. The resignations were tenderedcommittee continues to emphasize the importance of diversity and in accordance with our board diversity policy, has instructed the termsfirm to include women and persons of the agreement following a decreaseethnic and racial diversity in the Icahn group’s share ownership. The Icahn group no longer has any designees on our board. As a resultpool of these transitions, board refreshment is a priority and our nominating and corporate governance committee is currently considering potential board candidates who can contribute to the company’s success. Potential board candidates are being considered in accordance with the criteria set forth in our corporate governance guidelines described in the following section.candidates.

Director Nominations and Qualifications

Our nominating and corporateThe governance committee seeks to have a board that represents a diverse range of perspectives and experiences relevant to our company. In evaluating the suitability of potential director nominees, for membership on the board, our nominating and corporate governance committee applies the board membership criteria set forth in our corporate governance guidelines. Under these criteria, the committee takes into account many factors, including the following:

✓     (*) Includes Carl C. Icahn, High River Limited Partnership, Hopper Investments LLC, Barberry Corp., Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Icahn Offshore LP, Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Onshore LP, Icahn Capital LP, IPH GP LLC, Icahn Enterprises Holdings L.P., Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc., Beckton Corp., personal and Messrs. Langhamprofessional integrity   ✓   corporate finance and Mather.other matters relevant to the successful management of a large publicly traded company in today’s business environment ✓   general understanding of our industry ✓   educational and professional background   ✓   the ability and willingness to work cooperatively with other members of the board and with senior management and to devote adequate time to duties of the board ✓   independence ✓   diversity 8    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement corporate finance and other matters relevant to the successful management of a large publicly-traded company in today’s business environment, educational and professional background, independence, diversity, and the ability and willingness to work cooperatively with other members of the board and with senior management. The governance committee also evaluates each individual in the context of the board as a whole, with the objective of recommending nominees who can best advance the long-term success of the business, be effective directors in conjunction with the full board and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using their diversity of experience in these various areas. The board recognizes and embraces diversity and is actively committed to inclusion and diversity in the boardroom. Our board diversity policy is set forth in our corporate governance guidelines. When evaluating the diversity of potential director nominees, the governance committee considers a broad range of diversity, including diversity in terms of professional experience, skills and background, as well as diversity of gender, race and ethnicity. Further, as set forth in the corporate governance guidelines, when conducting searches for new directors, the governance committee includes qualified female and racially and/or ethnically diverse individuals in the pool of candidates. In the event that vacancies on our board are anticipated or otherwise arise, the governance committee will consider various potential candidates who may come to the attention of the committee through current board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. Each candidate brought to the attention of the committee, regardless of who recommended such candidate, will be equally considered on the basis of the criteria set forth above. Board Leadership Structure The board believes that the decision to combine or separate the positions of chairman of the board and chief executive officer is highly dependent on the strengths and personalities of the individuals involved. In addition, the decision must take into account current business conditions and the environment in which the company operates. While ourby-laws and corporate governance guidelines do not require our chairman of the board and chief executive officer positions to be separate, these positions are separate at our company, and the board believes that having separate positions continues to be the appropriate leadership structure for the company at this time. The responsibilities of ournon-executive chairman of the board include: presiding at meetings of the board, including all executive sessions of the independent directors; overseeing the management, development and functioning of the board; and in consultation with the chief executive officer, planning and organizing the schedule and establishing the agendas for board meetings. The board believes this structure provides an effective balance between strong company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors. Board’s Role in Oversight of Risk Management The board takes an active role in risk oversight. The board as a whole is responsible for risk oversight at the company, with reviews of certain areas being conducted by the relevant board committees that regularly report to the full board. In its risk oversight role, the board reviews, evaluates and discusses with appropriate members of management whether the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate in identifying, assessing, managing and mitigating material risks facing the company, including financial, international, operational, and environmental risks. The board believes that full and open communication between senior management and the board is essential to effective risk oversight. Ournon-executive chairman regularly meets and discusses with our chief executive officer a variety of matters, including business strategies, opportunities, key challenges and risks facing the company, as well as management’s risk mitigation strategies. Senior management attends all regularly-scheduled board meetings where they conduct presentations on various strategic matters involving our operations and are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management-related or any other matters. The board oversees the strategic direction of the company, and in doing so considers the potential rewards and risks of our business opportunities and challenges, and monitors the development and management of risks that impact our strategic goals.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    911 The chart below provides an overview of the allocation of risk management responsibilities among the board committees. Board of Directors Responsible for risk oversight at the companyBoard Committees Assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to certain areas of risk. Each committee regularly reports on these matters to the full board. Audit Committee Responsible for reviewing and discussing with management, our internal audit firm and our independent registered public accounting firm any guidelines and policies relating to risk assessment and risk management, and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and minimize the companys major financial risk exposures Assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting, and the companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements Meets periodically with internal audit firm and independent registered public accounting firm in executive session Discusses with the independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit firm the results of their processes to assess risk in the context of their respective audit engagements Responsible for reviewing periodically the adequacy and effectiveness of the companys information and technology security policies and the internal controls regarding information technology security and cybersecurity Compensation Committee Responsible for overseeing the companys assessment of whether its compensation policies and practices are likely to expose the company to material risks Responsible, in consultation with management, for overseeing the companys compliance with regulations governing executive and director compensation Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with the companys board leadership structure and corporate governance matters Corporate Responsibility Committee Assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with our safety and health policies and programs, environmental policy and implementation programs, human rights policy and practices, community health programs and related public health and medical matters, community policy and practices, governmental and stakeholder relations and social investment and sustainable development programs, programs to evaluate and address climate-related impacts and opportunities, charitable contributions and political activity and spending practices 10    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement Succession Planning for Senior Executives The board is focused on ensuring that the company has an emergency and long-term succession planplans in place for key senior executive positions. The independent directors of the board are responsible for overseeing the company’s succession planning process for our CEO and other key senior executives and annually review the company’s succession plans for all key senior executives with input from the CEO. Emergency Succession Plan In the event of an unexpected executive departure, the emergency succession plan allows for smooth transfer of responsibilities to an individual who may or may not be permanently tasked withappointed to the new role. In the event of a senior executive’s departure, both internal and external candidates may be considered for permanent appointment to a givensuch role. Long-Term Succession Plan The long-term succession plan is intended to develop a pipeline of qualified talent for key roles. The company’s short and long-term business strategy will be considered when evaluating candidates and their skills. The planning process includes a discussion of internal succession candidates, assessment of relevant skills and planning for professional development where necessary. Multiple internal succession candidates may be identified for an individual role and provided with relevant growth opportunities. The board gains insight through direct exposure to internal succession candidates from their presentations to the board, work with individual directors or board committees, and participation in board activities. The independent directors oversee thecompany’s short- and long-term business strategy will be considered when evaluating internal succession planning process for our chief executive officercandidates and other key senior executives and annually review the company’s succession plans for all key senior executives with input from the chief executive officer. their skills. In 2018,2020, all of the independent directors met in executive session to review the company’s emergency and long-term succession plan.plans. In the event that the succession plan is triggered for any of these roles,key senior executives, the full board would participate in the discussion and consideration of any action with a final decision to be made by the independent directors of the board. DirectorBoard’s Role in Oversight of Strategy and Executive Officer Stock Ownership GuidelinesRisk Management The nominatingboard is deeply engaged and corporate governance committee adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable toinvolved in overseeing ournon-management directors. strategy and takes an active role in risk oversight. The compensation committee adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to our executive officers. Underboard oversees the guidelines, eachnon-management director is expected to maintain ownershipstrategic direction of the company, stock having a value equal to at least five times his or her annual retainer, which retainer is currently $75,000. Our chief executive officer is expected to maintain ownership of company stock valued at six times his base salary. Eachand in doing so considers the potential rewards and risks of our other executive officers is expected to maintain ownershipbusiness opportunities and challenges, and monitors the development and management of company stock valued at three times his or her base salary. The value of the stock ownership is calculated based on theone-year and five-year trailing average monthly stock price. Shares ofrisks that impact our common stock currently owned and not pledged, including shares issuable upon the vesting of outstanding time-vested RSUs and shares held in employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts, count as stock owned for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines. Shares held in trust may also be included; however, due to the complexities of the trust laws, the decision to include the shares is made on acase-by-case basis after reviewing the nature of the specific trust involved and considering whether the individual has maintained a pecuniary interest in the shares. Performance share units (PSUs) and shares owned on behalf of a spouse or children are not counted towards the target level. Stock ownership levels should be achieved by eachnon-management director and executive officer as soon as practicable or within four years of being appointed or elected to the board or becoming an executive officer. As of April 15, 2019, all of ournon-management directors and all of our executive officers exceeded their target ownership levels.strategic goals. Board Evaluation Process The nominating and corporate governance committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the board as a whole and each committeeis responsible for risk oversight at the company, with reviews of certain areas being conducted by the board. Annually, each director completes an evaluation of the fullrelevant board and of each committee on which the director serves. The evaluations are intended to provide the board and each committee with an opportunity to evaluate performance for the purpose of improving board and committee processes and effectiveness. The detailed questionnaires seek quantitative ratings and subjective comments in key areas of board practices, and ask each director to evaluate how well the board and committees operate and to make suggestions for improvements. The nominating and corporate governance committee reviews the results and the assessment of board performance is presentedthat regularly report to the full board. In its risk oversight role, the board reviews, evaluates and discusses with appropriate members of management whether the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate in identifying, assessing, managing and mitigating material risks facing the company, including financial, international, operational, social and environmental risks. The resultsboard believes that full and open communication between senior management and the directors is essential to effective risk oversight. Our lead independent director regularly meets and discusses with our chairman and CEO on a variety of each committee evaluationmatters, including business strategies, opportunities, key challenges and risks facing the company, as well as management’s risk mitigation strategies. Senior management attends all regularly-scheduled board meetings where they conduct presentations on various strategic matters involving our operations and are deliveredavailable to the respective chair of each committee. The results can then be leveragedaddress any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management-related or relevant committee when considering issues such asother matters. 12    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement The chart below provides an overview of the allocation of risk management responsibilities among the board refreshment, committee operations, or board procedures.committees.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    1113 Board Committees The board has four primary standing committees: an audit, committee, a compensation, committee, a nominatinggovernance and corporate governance committee, and a corporate responsibility, committee, each of which is composed entirely of independent directors.directors and regularly reports to the full board. Each committee also operates under a written charter adopted by the board. AllSee “Corporate Governance – Availability of the committee charters are available on our website atfcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance – Board Committees and Charters” and are available in print upon request. The following table identifies the current committee members.Documents” for more information.     Audit Committee   Meetings in 2020: 4 Primary Responsibilities Assists the board in its oversight responsibilities relating to: •   the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting •   the integrity of the company’s financial statements •   the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements •   the qualifications and independence of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm •   the performance of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit firm See “Audit Committee Report” for additional information.   2020 Meeting Attendance: 94%   Current Committee Members(*)   John J. Stephens, Chair ∎   Gerald J. Ford(*)∎   Lydia H. Kennard   Dustan E. McCoy ∎ = Financial Expert   Committee consists of four   independent directors.   Compensation Committee   Meetings in 2020: 6   (includes 3 special meetings) Primary Responsibilities Assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by: •   discharging the board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the company’s executive officers •   overseeing the form and amount of director compensation •   administering the company’s cash-based and equity-based incentive compensation plans See “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Committee Report” and “Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee Procedures” for more information.   2020 Meeting Attendance: 100%   Current Committee Members(*)   Dustan E. McCoy, Chair   Frances Fragos Townsend   Committee consists of two   independent directors.   Governance Committee   Meetings in 2020: 2 Primary Responsibilities Assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by: •   identifying and formally considering and recommending to the board, candidates to be nominated for election or re-election to the board at each annual meeting of stockholders or as necessary to fill vacancies and newly-created directorships •   monitoring the composition of the board and its committees and making formal recommendations to the board on membership of the committees and committee structure •   maintaining the corporate governance guidelines and overseeing the company’s corporate governance practices and procedures, including identifying best practices and reviewing and recommending to the board for approval any changes to the documents, policies and procedures in the company’s corporate governance framework •   reviewing and, as necessary, making recommendations to the board with respect to stockholder proposals •   evaluating the effectiveness of the board, its committees and management See “Corporate Governance” for more information.   2020 Meeting Attendance: 100%   Current Committee Members(*)   Lydia H. Kennard, Chair   Gerald J. Ford(*)   Committee consists of two   independent directors. 14    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement   Name of DirectorCorporate Responsibility Committee   Audit Committee     Compensation Committee Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Corporate Responsibility Committee     Gerald J. FordMeetings in 2020: 3     Chair  2020 Meeting Attendance: 100%     Chair  Current Committee Members(*)     Frances Fragos Townsend, Chair   Lydia H. Kennard ✓ ✓ ✓   Dustan E. McCoy     Committee consists of three   independent directors.    Primary Responsibilities ✓ Assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the company’s environmental and social policies and implementation programs. The company’s environmental and social programs focus areas include: •  safety and health •  responsible production frameworks •  tailings management and stewardship •  climate change •  water stewardship •  biodiversity •  waste management     •  human capital management Chair•  human rights •  stakeholder relations, social performance and Indigenous Peoples ✓•  responsible sourcing •  political activity and spending practices   Frances Fragos Townsend        ✓ ChairSee “Sustainability” for more information.   Audit Committee.The audit committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: (1) the effectiveness(*) As previously disclosed, Mr. Ford will retire as a director effective as of the company’s internal control over financial reporting; (2) the integritydate of the company’s financial statements; (3) the company’s compliance with legalour 2021 annual meeting. Messrs. Abney and regulatory requirements; (4) the qualifications and independence of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm; and (5) the performance of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit firm. For more information on the audit committee, see the section titled “Audit Committee Report.” The audit committee held four meetings in 2018. Compensation Committee.The compensation committee assists theDudley have not yet been assigned to any committees as our board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by (1) discharging the board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the company’s executive officers; (2) overseeing the form and amount of director compensation; and (3) administering the company’s cash-based and equity-based incentive compensation plans. For more information on the compensation committee, see the section titled “Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee Procedures.” The compensation committee held four meetings in 2018 (three regular and one special). Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by (1) identifying and formally considering and recommending to the board, candidates to be nominated for election orre-election to the board at each annual meeting of stockholders or as necessary to fill vacancies and newly-created directorships; (2) monitoring the composition of the board and its committees and making formal recommendations to the board on membership of the committees; (3) overseeing the company’s corporate governance practices and procedures, including identifying best practices and reviewing and recommending to the board for approval any changes to the documents, policies and proceduresis currently in the company’s corporate governance framework, including maintaining the company’s corporate governance guidelines and recommending to the board any desirable changes; (4)process of reviewing and, as necessary, making recommendations to the board with respect to stockholder proposals; and (5) evaluating the effectiveness of the board, its committees and management. The nominating and corporate governance committee held two meetings in 2018. Corporate Responsibility Committeeassignments..The corporate responsibility committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the company’s (1) environmental policy and implementation programs; (2) human rights policy and practices; (3) safety and health policies and programs; (4) community health programs and related public health and medical matters; (5) community policy and practices, governmental and stakeholder relations, and social investment and sustainable development programs; (6) programs to evaluate and address climate-related impacts and opportunities; (7) charitable contributions; and (8) political activity and spending practices. The corporate responsibility committee held three meetings in 2018. 2020 Board Meetings and Committee Meeting Attendance The board had a total of ten meetings during 2018 (four regular meetings and six special meetings). During 2018, each of our directors participated in 100% of the total number of meetings of the board and meetings held by each           11                 2020 board meetings (including regular and special)                     100     %           2020 board meeting attendance   12    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement committee of the board on which each director served. Directors are invited, but not required, to attend annual meetings of our stockholders. Mr.Ms. Townsend and Messrs. Adkerson and Stephens attended our 20182020 annual meeting of stockholders. Board and Committee Independence; Audit Committee Financial ExpertExperts In accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the board must make an affirmative determination that a director has no material relationship with the company and management for such director to be deemed independent. To assist the board in making determinations of independence, the nominating and corporate governance committee established director independence standards, which meet, and in some respects exceed, the independence requirements of the NYSE. In addition, members of the audit and compensation committees must meet heightened standards of independence in accordance with the requirements of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. The director independence standards are set forth in Appendix A to our corporate governance guidelines, which are available atfcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance – Governance Documents.” On the basis of information solicited from each director, and upon the advice and recommendation of the nominating and corporate governance committee, our board annually determines the independence of each of our directors in connection with the nomination process. Further, in connection with the appointment of any new director to the board has affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Ford and McCoy and each of Mses. Kennard and Townsend has no material relationship withduring the company and is independent withinyear, our board makes the meaning of our director independence standards.same determination. In making this determination,its recommendation to the nominating and corporateboard, the governance committee, with assistance from the company’s legal counsel, evaluatedevaluates responses to a questionnaire completed annually by each director regarding relationships and possible conflicts of interest between eachsuch director, the company, management, the independent registered public accounting firm and management.the internal audit firm. In its review of director independence, the governance committee consideredconsiders the commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial relationships any director may have with the company, or management. The nominatingmanagement, the independent registered public accounting firm and corporate governance committee recommendedthe internal audit firm. Our board has affirmatively determined that all current directors (other than Mr. Adkerson) have no material relationship with the company and are independent according to the board thatNew York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards and within the four directors named above be considered independent,meaning of our director independence standards, which meet, and in some instances exceed, the board approved. independence requirements of the NYSE. The board also has determined that each of the members of the audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance, and corporate responsibility committees has no material relationship with the company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteriaqualifications with respect to members of the audit committee and compensation committee) set forth in the applicable NYSE listing standards and SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. In addition, the board has determined that Mr.each of Messrs. Ford qualifiesand Stephens qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by the rules of the SEC. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement15 Compensation Committee Procedures The compensation committee has the sole authority to set compensation for our executive officers, including annual compensation amounts and annualAIP and LTI programLTIP criteria, evaluate the performance of our executive officers, and make awards to our executive officers under our stock incentive plan. The compensation committee also reviews, approves and recommends to the board any proposed plan or arrangement providing for incentive, retirement or other compensation to our executive officers and oversees our assessment of whether our compensation practices are likely to expose the company to material risks. In addition, the compensation committee annually recommends to the board the slate of officers for the company, periodically reviews the functions of our executive officers and makes recommendations to the board concerning those functions. To the extent equity awards are granted in a given year, the compensation committee’s historical practice has been to grant such awards at its first meeting of that year, which is usually held in January or February. Each July or August, the board establishes a meeting schedule for itself and its committees for the next calendar year. Thus, the first meeting of each year is scheduled approximately six months in advance and is scheduled to fall within the window period following the release of the company’s earnings for the fourth quarter of the previous year. The compensation committee has a written policy stating that it will approve all regular equity-based awards at its first or second regular meeting of each fiscal year, and that to the extent the committee approves anyout-of-cycle awards at other times during the year, such awards will be made during an open window period during which our executive officers and directors are permitted to trade company securities. Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement13 The terms of our stock incentive plan provide that the exercise price of each stock option cannot be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date. Pursuant to the compensation committee’s policies, for purposes of our stock incentive plan, the fair market value of our common stock will be determined by reference to the closing quoted per share sale price of our common stock on the composite tape for NYSE-listed stocks on the grant date. In addition, our stock incentive plan permits the committee to delegate to appropriate personnel its authority to make awards to employees other than those subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our current equity grant policy provides that each of our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief administrative officer has authority to make or modify grants to such employees, subject to the following conditions: No grant may relate to more than 20,000 shares of our common stock; Such grants must be approved during an open window period and must be approved in writing by such officer, the grant date being the date of such written approval or such later date set forth in the grant instrument; The exercise price of any options granted may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant; and Any such grants must be reported to the committee at its next meeting. The compensation committee is also responsible for the oversight of director compensation, including the authority to grant equity-based awards, and conducts an annual review and assessment of all compensation, cash and equity-based, paid to ournon-management directors under our director compensation program. For more information regarding director compensation philosophy and procedures, see the section titled “Director Compensation” on page 53. The compensation committee engages an independent executive compensation consultant to advise the compensation committeeit on matters related to executive and director compensation. Please refer to the section titled “Compensation“Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information related to the independent executive compensation consultant. In addition, the board has its own independent legal counsel, with whom the compensation committee consults on an as needed basis. CompensationLimitation on Additional Board and Committee Interlocks and Insider ParticipationService The current membersIt is the expectation of our compensation committee are Mr. McCoythe board that every member devotes the significant time and Ms. Townsend. In 2018, none of our executive officers servedattention necessary to fulfill their duties as a memberdirector. Our corporate governance guidelines establish the following limits on our directors serving on public company boards and audit committees: Director Category Limit on public company board and committee service, including FCX All directors 4 boards Directors who serve on our audit committee 3 audit committees The governance committee may approve exceptions to these limitations under certain circumstances. Service on boards or committees of other organizations should be consistent with the company’s conflict of interest standards. Additionally, directors are expected to advise the chairman of the board, the lead independent director and the chair of the governance committee prior to accepting any other public company directorship or any assignment to the audit committee or compensation committee of another entity, or asthe board of directors of any public company of which such director is a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our compensation committee or as one of our directors.member. 16    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Board and Committee Evaluation Process Our insider trading policy prohibits our executivesboard and directorseach of its committees have a robust annual self-evaluation process to ensure that they are performing effectively and in the best interests of the company and its stockholders. The governance committee oversees this annual performance evaluation process. The governance committee periodically reviews the evaluation process and revises as appropriate. In 2020, like in previous years, the multi-step evaluation process was conducted using written board and committee self-assessment questionnaires. However, in March 2021, following a review of the evaluation process by the lead independent director and the new chair of the governance committee, the format of the evaluation process was changed from entering into any hedging arrangements with respectwritten board and committee self-assessment questionnaires to our securities and limitsone-on-one director discussions conducted by the ability of our executives and directors to pledge our securities. For more information, seelead independent director. The board will use the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21.revised multi-step process as summarized in the chart below for the 2021 evaluation process. Director Candidates Submitted by Stockholders Non-Proxy Access Nominations Our nominating and corporateThe governance committee will consider candidates proposed for nomination by our stockholders. Stockholders may propose candidates by submitting the names and supporting information to: Corporate Secretary, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. Supporting information should include (a) the name and address of the candidate and the proposing stockholder; (b) a comprehensive biography of the candidate and an explanation of why the candidate is qualified to serve as a director taking into account the criteria identified in our corporate governance guidelines; (c) proof of ownership, the class and number of shares, and the length of time that the shares of our voting securities have been beneficially owned by each of the candidate and the proposing stockholder; and (d) a letter from the candidate stating his or her willingness to serve, if elected. 14    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement In addition, ourby-laws permit stockholders to nominate candidates directly for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Anynon-proxy access nomination must be in writing and received by our corporate secretary at our principal executive office no later than April 13, 2020.March 10, 2022. If the date of next year’s annual meeting is moved to a date more than 90 days after or more than 30 days before the anniversary of this year’s annual meeting, the nomination must be received no later than the later of 6090 days prior to the date of the 20202022 annual meeting or 10 days following the public announcement of the date of the 20202022 annual meeting. Any stockholder submitting anon-proxy access nomination under ourby-law procedures must include (a) all information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including such nominee’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected), (b) the name and address (as they appear on the company’s books) of the nominating stockholder and number of shares directly or indirectly beneficially owned by such stockholder, and (c) all other information required by ourby-laws. Nominations should be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement17 Proxy Access Nominations Ourby-laws also contain a proxy access provision approved by our stockholders in 2016 that permits a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more shares of our common stock continuously for the three years prior to the date of submission of a notice nominating a candidate for director and continuing up to the date of the annual meeting, to nominate and include in the company’s proxy materials stockholder nominees for election to the board constituting the greater of (a) two stockholder nominees or (b) 20% of the total number of directors in office as of the last day nominations of stockholder nominees may be submitted, rounded down to the nearest whole number, provided that the nominating stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in ourby-laws.following: A stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for the three years prior to the date of submission of a notice nominating a candidate for director and continuing up to the date of the annual meeting       Can nominate and include in the company’s proxy materials stockholder nominees for election to the board constituting the greater of (a) two stockholder nominees or (b) 20% of the total number of directors in office as of the last day nominations of stockholder nominees may be submitted, rounded down to the nearest whole number, provided that the nominating stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our by-laws Any director nomination pursuant to our proxy accessby-law must be in writing and received by our corporate secretary at our principal executive office no later than December 27, 2019.23, 2021. If the date of next year’s annual meeting is moved to a date more than 30 days after or 30 days before the anniversary of this year’s annual meeting, the nomination must be received no later than the later of 180 days prior to the date of the 20202022 annual meeting or 10 days following the public announcement of the date of the 20202022 annual meeting. Any stockholder submitting a nomination under our proxy accessby-law procedures must comply with the procedure, notice and information requirements in Article IV, Section 12 of ourby-laws. Nominations made pursuant to our proxy accessby-law should be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. Communications with the Board The board believes that senior management speaks for the company. Individual board members may, from time to time, meet or otherwise communicate with the company’s stakeholders at the request of the board or senior management.management in compliance with applicable policies. Stockholders or other interested parties may communicate directly with one or more members of the board including the lead independent director, or the independent directors as a group, by writing to the director or directors at the following address: Freeport-McMoRan Inc., Attn: Board of Directors (or the name of the individual director or directors), 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. The communication will be forwarded to thenon-executive chairman lead independent director of the board or the appropriate director or directors for response. Availability of Corporate Governance Documents  Principles of   Business  Conduct  Audit Committee Charter  Compensation  Committee Charter  Governance  Committee  Charter Corporate  Responsibility  Committee Charter Corporate Governance Guidelines Director  Independence  Standards Stockholders may view our audit, compensation, governance and corporate responsibility committee charters on our website at fcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance – Board Committees and Charters.” Stockholders may view our corporate governance guidelines (including our director independence standards set forth in Appendix A to our corporate governance guidelines) and principles of business conduct on our website at fcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance – Governance Documents.” These documents are available in print upon request. Amendments to or waivers of our principles of business conduct granted to any of our directors or executive officers will be published promptly on our website. Information on our website is not and should not be considered a part of this proxy statement. 18    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement STOCK OWNERSHIP Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines To promote greater alignment with our stockholders and reinforce the importance of stock ownership and long-term focus, we have stock ownership guidelines applicable to our non-management directors and executive officers. 6x base salary for CEO 5x annual fee (currently $125,000) for non-management directors 3x base salary for other executive officers The value of the stock ownership is calculated based on the three-year trailing average month-end stock price. Shares of our common stock currently owned and not pledged, including shares issuable upon the vesting of outstanding time-vested RSUs and shares held in employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts, count as stock owned for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines. Shares held in trust may also be included; however, due to the complexities of the trust laws, the decision to include the shares is made on a case-by-case basis after reviewing the nature of the specific trust involved and considering whether the individual has maintained a pecuniary interest in the shares. Common stock underlying PSUs and other performance-based equity awards will not be counted towards the target ownership level until such shares are earned and issued, nor will shares owned on behalf of a spouse or children. Until the target ownership level is met, executive officers shall retain 50% of the net, after-tax shares of FCX common stock received in connection with any equity-based awards granted by FCX, and non-management directors shall retain 100% of the shares of FCX common stock they receive in connection with any equity-based awards granted by FCX. Once the target ownership level is met, such executive officers and non-management directors are free to sell FCX shares in accordance with the requirements of FCX’s Insider Trading Policy, as applicable, provided their holdings do not fall below the target ownership level. If, after achieving the applicable target level of ownership, an executive officer or non-management director subsequently falls out of compliance with these guidelines (including as a result of a decline in our stock price), the applicable retention requirement described above will once again apply. As of the record date, our executive officers and all of our non-management directors, except for our newest directors, Messrs. Abney and Dudley, who joined the board in April 2021, and Mr. Ford, who will retire as a director effective as of the date of our 2021 annual meeting, exceeded their target ownership levels. Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers We believe that it is important for our directors and executive officers to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We encourage stock accumulation through the grant of equity incentives to our directors and executive officers and through stock ownership guidelines applicable to our directors and executive officers.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    1519 The table below shows the amount of our common stock beneficially owned as of April 12, 2021, by each of our current directors, our director nominees, our named executive officers (NEOs), and our current executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, all shares shown in the table below are held with sole voting and investment power. Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares Not Subject to Exercisable Options or Vesting of RSUs Number of Shares Subject to Exercisable Options (1) Number of Shares Subject to Vesting of RSUs (1) Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (2)   Percent of   Class (3) David P. Abney**   —   —   —   — * Richard C. Adkerson   3,334,117   3,074,167   1,000,000   7,408,284  (5) * Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV (4)   82,000   645,667   —   727,667 * Robert W. Dudley**   —   —   —   — * Gerald J. Ford   3,422   30,800   18,200   52,422 * Lydia H. Kennard   83,800   —   18,200   102,000 * Dustan E. McCoy   33,500   20,000   95,300   148,800 * Kathleen L. Quirk   1,177,066   1,486,834   —   2,663,900 * John J. Stephens   63,780   —   18,200   81,980  (6) * Frances Fragos Townsend   70,970   —   32,100   103,070 *                               Current directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons) (4)   4,766,655   4,611,801   1,182,000   10,560,456 * *         Ownership is less than 1%. **       Recently appointed to the board in April 2021. (1) Reflects our common stock that could be acquired within sixty days of the record date upon the exercise of options, vesting of RSUs, and the termination of deferrals on previously vested RSUs. (2) In addition to the RSUs included in “Number of Shares Subject to Vesting of RSUs,” each beneficial owner holds the following unvested RSUs and unvested PSUs, which are not included in the table above because they do not vest within sixty days of the record date.   Name of Beneficial Owner   Number of Shares Subject to Unvested RSUs      Number of Shares Subject to Unvested PSUs (Target level)     David P. Abney     700        —     Richard C. Adkerson     109,000        1,072,000     Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV     —        235,500     Robert W. Dudley     700        —     Gerald J. Ford     —        —     Lydia H. Kennard     —        —     Dustan E. McCoy     —        —     Kathleen L. Quirk     122,833        415,000     John J. Stephens     —        —     Frances Fragos Townsend     —        —                      Current directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)     233,233        1,487,000   See “Director Compensation” and “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the “2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” for more information. (3) Based on 1,464,599,416 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 12, 2021. 20    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement (4) Mr. Conger, who was an NEO during 2020, retired from the company effective September 1, 2020. Accordingly, Mr. Conger’s shares are not included in the total holdings of our directors and executive officers as a group. (5) Includes (a) 192,330 shares held in his individual retirement account (IRA); (b) 555,518 shares held in trusts and (c) 476,980 shares held in a foundation with respect to which Mr. Adkerson, as a member of the board of trustees, shares voting and investment power, but as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. Total number of shares beneficially owned includes the 1,000,000 shares underlying the RSUs awarded in December 2013, which Mr. Adkerson will receive six months after his retirement and which were fully vested at grant. (6) Includes 45,000 shares held by a family limited partnership. Hedging and Pledging Policies Our insider trading policy prohibits our executives and directors from entering into any hedging arrangements with respect to our securities and limits the ability of our executives and directors to pledge our securities. See “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information. Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners The table below shows persons known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of April 12, 2021.   Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of     Outstanding Shares (1)     The Vanguard Group   100 Vanguard Boulevard   Malvern, PA 19355 152,716,254 (2) 10.4%   BlackRock, Inc.   55 East 52nd Street   New York, NY 10055 121,742,573 (3)     8.3% (1) Based on 1,464,599,416 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 12, 2021. (2) Based on Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021, by The Vanguard Group on its own behalf and on behalf of its subsidiaries identified therein, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. The Schedule 13G/A reflects 146,580,187 shares held with sole dispositive power, 6,136,067 shares held with shared dispositive power, 2,297,837 shares held with shared voting power and no shares held with sole voting power. (3) Based on Amendment No. 11 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2021, by BlackRock, Inc. on its own behalf and on behalf of its subsidiaries identified therein, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. The Schedule 13G/A reflects 121,742,573 shares held with sole dispositive power, 109,867,756 shares held with sole voting power and no shares held with shared dispositive or voting power. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement21 PROPOSAL NO. 1:    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS In February of 2021, our former non-executive chairman, Mr. Ford, announced his intention to retire as a director effective upon the expiration of his current term at the annual meeting, at which time the size of the board will decrease to seven directors. We are immensely thankful to Mr. Ford for his leadership, legacy of service, and leading independent oversight by our board. Upon the recommendation of our nominating and corporatethe governance committee, the board has nominated fiveseven directors for election at our 20192021 annual meeting to hold office until our next annual meeting and the election of their successors. All of the nominees currently serve as directors of the company. Each nominee has consented to being named as a nominee in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. The persons named as proxies on the proxy card intend to vote your proxy for the election of each such nominee, unless otherwise directed. If, contrary to our expectations, any nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, your proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the board or the board may reduce its size. Our director nominees represent a range of tenures and overall experience, which contributes to a variety of perspectives and facilitates transition of institutional knowledge from longer-serving members to newer members of our board. We believe this balanced composition is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders, as our industry and strategic initiatives often have prolonged lifecycles, and it is therefore helpful to have seasoned directors who are familiar with our company and can draw on past experience and expertise balanced with newer directors who bring fresh perspectives. The experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the board and the nominating and corporate governance committee to conclude that each of the nominees should serve as a director offor the company are set forth in the below table which our nominating and corporate governance committee has used forbios on the past three years. For additional information regarding each nominee, see “Information About Director Nominees” beginning on page 17.following pages.   22    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement   Experience, Qualifications, Attributes &2021 Director Nominees Skills Matrix and Demographics   Adkerson   Ford      Kennard     McCoy    Townsend  Senior leadership experience ✓ ✓   ✓ ✓ Accounting/financial expertise ✓ ✓   ✓ Public company board experience ✓ ✓   ✓ ✓ ✓ Operational management ✓ ✓   ✓ ✓ International business ✓ ✓ ✓ Capital markets/banking ✓ ✓   ✓ Environmental/sustainability/corporate responsibility ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Government, legal and regulatory compliance ✓ ✓   ✓ ✓ ✓ Diversity (gender, race) ✓ ✓                   Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills   Why is this important to FCX?               Senior leadership experience   Broad experience in senior leadership positions, including managing a global business, provides informed and practical insights in developing and implementing business strategy, maintaining effective, sustainable and safe operations, and driving growth in order to achieve our strategic goals.   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓     Accounting/ financial expertise   Experience as an accountant, auditor, financial advisor or other similar experience is critical to oversight of the preparation and audit of our financial statements and compliance with various related regulatory requirements and standards.       ✓       ✓       ✓     Public company board experience   Directors who serve or have served on the boards and board committees of other public companies demonstrate a deep understanding of risk oversight, corporate governance standards and best practices of public company boards and board committees.   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓       ✓ Operational management/risk management   Experience in operational matters and requirements assists the board in understanding the issues that the company may face in its global activities and operations, environmental management, risk management, strategic planning, cybersecurity and labor relations.   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓     International business/global affairs   Experience in international business/global affairs or experience related to global economic trends yields an understanding of geographically diverse business environments, regulatory matters, economic conditions and cultural perspectives that informs our global business and strategy and enhances our international operations.   ✓   ✓   ✓       ✓   ✓   ✓ Natural resources, mining, metals industry experience   Natural resources, mining, metals or other extractives industry experience assists in understanding our business drivers, operations, key performance indicators and competitive environment.       ✓   ✓       ✓         Capital markets/ banking   Experience overseeing capital markets and banking transactions provides the knowledge and skills necessary to evaluate and oversee the company’s design and implementation of financing and capital allocation strategies.   ✓   ✓           ✓   ✓     Sustainability   Sustainability experience supports our commitment to meeting the highest standards of environmental stewardship across our operations, respecting human rights in all of our business practices, and prioritizing the health, safety and well-being of our workforce and host communities where we operate.   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓       ✓ Government, legal and/or regulatory compliance   Government, legal and regulatory compliance experience offers valuable insight into the impact of laws, rules, regulations, and other governmental actions and decisions on our company and our industry.       ✓       ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓     Demographics                                                                                                                                                                               Tenure (Years)       0.0   14.5   0.0   7.3   14.0   1.5   7.3                   Age (Years)       65   74   65   66   71   61   59                 Gender (Male/Female)   M   M   M   F   M   M   F     Race/Ethnicity                                                                                                                                                                                    African American/Black (Not Hispanic or Latino)               ✓                             White (Not Hispanic or Latino)   ✓   ✓   ✓       ✓   ✓   ✓ For moreAll information regarding director nominations and qualifications, seecurrent as of the sections titledrecord date, April 12, 2021. See “Corporate Governance – Director Nominations and Qualifications” and “Corporate Governance – Director Candidates Submitted by Stockholders” beginning on pages 8 and 14, respectively.for more information. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement23 Vote Required to Elect Director Nominees Under ourby-laws, in uncontested elections, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast.cast, meaning a candidate for director is elected if the votes in favor of his or her election exceed the votes against his or her election. In contested elections where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors are elected by a plurality vote, meaning that the director nominees who receive the most votes will be elected. In an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election will be required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the board. Our nominating and corporateThe governance committee will recommend to the board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The board will act on the governance committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days from the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Any director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the committee’s recommendation or the board action regarding whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. 16    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement In addition, if each member of the nominating and corporate governance committee fails to be elected at the same election, the independent directors who were elected will appoint a committee to consider the tendered resignations and recommend to the board whether to accept or reject them. Any vacancies on the board may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office. Each director elected in this manner will hold office until his or her successor is elected and duly qualified. For more information on the voting requirements, seeSee “Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials, Annual Meeting and Voting.”Voting” for more information. Board of Directors’ Recommendation on Proposal No. 1   OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR ALLEACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED BELOW. Information About Director Nominees The following table providesIncluded below is certain information current as of the record date, April 15, 2019,12, 2021, with respect to eachthe director nominee,nominees, including information regarding business experience, director positions with other public companies held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our nominating and corporatethe governance committee and the board to determine that such person should be nominated at our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders to serve as a director of the company. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has been engaged in the principal occupation shown for the past five years. Former public company directorships reflect positions held in the last five years.     David P. Abney (Independent) Age: 65                 Director Since: 2021       Richard C. Adkerson            Vice       Retired Chairman and Chief Executive        Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc.        Current Public Company Directorships        •     Macy’s, Inc. (until May 21, 2021)(*)        •     Northrop Grumman Corporation         Former Public Company Directorships        •     United Parcel Service, Inc.        •     Johnson Controls International plc         (*) As publicly disclosed, Mr. Abney has         notified Macy’s, Inc. that he does not intend         to stand for re-election to Macy’s board at         the company’s annual meeting being held on         May 21, 2021. Business Experience Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), a multinational package delivery and supply chain management company. Chairman of the Board of Directors of UPS since 2016 and CEO of UPS since 2014 until his retirement in 2020. Chief Operating Officer of UPS from 2007 to 2014. Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer President of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Age: 72 Director since: 2006UPS International from 2003 to 2007. Mr. Abney began his career with UPS in 1974. Skills and Qualifications      Mr. Abney brings extensive leadership and business experience to the board as the former Chairman and CEO of a complex, global enterprise with a large, labor-intensive workforce. His accomplished 46-year career at UPS included executive management roles in operations, international development, logistics, sustainability and engineering across all facets of the UPS global transportation network. He has significant expertise in international operations, global logistics and supply chain resilience as well as broad experience with talent management, leading global teams and overseeing sustainability driven change (including the transition to emerging technologies), making him highly qualified to serve on our board. He also brings with him public company board experience as well as nonprofit leadership experience. During his time as CEO of UPS, Mr. Abney also served on the Board of Directors of Catalyst, a global nonprofit working to advance women into senior leadership and board positions. Mr. Abney holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Delta State University. 24    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement   Richard C. Adkerson                   Age: 74                 Director Since: 2006                    Chairman of the Board and Chief        Executive Officer of Freeport-        McMoRan Inc. Business Experience:Experience Chief Executive Officer of the company since December 2003. Chairman of the Board since February 2021, and Vice Chairman of the Board from May 2013 to February 2021. President of the company sincefrom January 2008 to February 2021 and from April 1997 to March 2007. Chief Financial Officer of the company from October 2000 to December 2003. Vice Chairman of the Board ofPrior to joining the company since May 2013. Vice Chairman of our former parent company from 1995 to 1997.in 1989, Partner and Managing Director in Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1978 to 1989 where he served as a Managing Director and head ofheaded the firm’s global oil and gas industry services.services from 1979 to 1987, and headed the firm’s global public company accounting and audit practice from 1987 to 1988. Professional Accounting Fellow with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC and Presidential Exchange Executive from 1976 to 1978. Skills and Qualifications:Qualifications Mr. Adkerson is a recognized business leader in the mining industry, with decades of industry and operational experience, a vision for the company’s long-term strategy, connectivity to our global workforce, and strong relationships with our stakeholders, making him highly qualified to serve as a Vice Chairman of the Board of the company. As President and Chief Executive Officer, and previously as President, of our company, he has demonstrated exceptional leadership abilities in developing and executing a financial strategy that has benefited our stockholders and in building an operational, financial and administrative organization that efficiently supports our business. Mr. Adkerson is recognizedcurrently serves as a mining industry leader, having served as past ChairmanChair of the International Council on Mining and Metals andICMM, a position he also held from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Adkerson previously served on the Executive Board of the International Copper Association. Mr. Adkerson’s strong leadership skills and executive management experiences are instrumental in fostering strong relationships with business partners, key customers, suppliers and host governments, thereby enabling him to guide the company’s business strategy. He holds a B.S. in Accounting with highest honors and an M.B.A. from Mississippi State University and completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School.   Robert W. Dudley  (Independent) Age: 65                 Director Since: 2021                 Retired Group Chief Executive of BP,         p.l.c.        Current Public Company Directorships        •     LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (*)        •     Rosneft OAO        Former Public Company Directorships        •     BP, p.l.c.        (*) As publicly disclosed, Mr. Dudley is a        nominee for election at the LyondellBasell        Industries N.V. annual meeting to be held on        May 28, 2021. Business Experience Retired Group Chief Executive of BP, p.l.c., a British multinational oil and gas company, a position he held from 2010 until his retirement in 2020. President and Chief Executive Officer of BP’s Gulf Coast Restoration Organization in the United States during 2010. President and Chief Executive Officer of TNK-BP, a Russian oil and gas company, from 2003 to 2008. Group Vice President responsible for BP’s upstream business in Russia, the Caspian region, Angola, Algeria and Egypt from 2002 to 2003. Vice President for BP’s renewables and alternative energy activities from 2000 to 2002 and Executive Assistant to BP’s Group Chief Executive from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Dudley began his career with Amoco Corporation in 1979, working in a variety of engineering and commercial positions, including General Manager of Strategy from 1997 to 1999 when Amoco was acquired by BP. Skills and Qualifications Mr. Dudley brings over 40 years of leadership and business experience in engineering, commercial, strategic, international and executive roles to the board. His extractives industry experience, expertise in complex strategic issues and leadership role in advancing BP’s transition to a lower carbon economy provide valuable boardroom perspective regarding the challenges and opportunities associated with our business and our focus on value and sustainability for the benefit of all stakeholders. As Chairman of the Oil and Gas Climate Change Initiative and Chair of the Accenture Global Energy Board, he has a deep understanding of the importance of sustainability as we continue to focus on supplying responsibly produced copper. Mr. Dudley holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois, a Masters in Management from Thunderbird School of Global Management (now part of Arizona State University), and an MBA from Southern Methodist University.     Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    1725 Lydia H. Kennard(Independent) Age: 66                 Director Since: 2013   Gerald J. Ford   Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Freeport- McMoRan Inc.; Chairman of the Board of Hilltop Holdings Inc. Independent Age: 74 Director since: 2000 Committees: •   Audit (Chair) •   Nominating and Corporate  Governance (Chair) Business Experience:Non-Executive Chairman of the Board from January 2016 to present. Principal stockholder and Chairman of the Board of Hilltop Holdings Inc., a Texas-based, publicly traded, diversified financial holding company, since 2007, and a director of Hilltop Holdings Inc. since 2005. General Partner of Ford Financial II, L.P., a private equity firm, from 2010 to present and of Ford Financial Fund, L.P., a private equity firm, from 2010 to 2016. Chairman of the BoardPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Golden State Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, California Federal Bank, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank, from 1998 through its 2002 merger with Citigroup Inc. Chairman of the Board of First Acceptance Corporation from 1996 to 2010 and Chief Executive Officer of First Acceptance Corporation from 1996 to 2002.KDG Construction Consulting   Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Ford is a banking and financial institutions entrepreneur who has been involved in numerous mergers and acquisitions of private and public sector financial institutions over the past 40 years. In that capacity, he acquired and consolidated 30 commercial banks from 1975 to 1993, forming First United Bank Group, Inc., a multi-bank holding company for which he served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until its sale in 1994. During this period, he also led investment consortiums that acquired numerous financial institutions, forming in succession, First Gibraltar Bank, FSB, First Madison Bank, FSB and First Nationwide Bank. His extensive banking industry experience and educational background provide him with expertise in financial, accounting and regulatory matters, making him a valuable member of the board of directors. In addition, Mr. Ford’s service on the board of directors and audit and corporate governance committees of a variety of public companies gives him a deep understanding of the role of the board and positions him well to serve as ournon-executive chairman of the board, and chair of our nominating and corporate governance and audit committees. He holds a B.A. in Economics and a J.D. from Southern Methodist University. Current Public Company Directorships: Hilltop Holdings Inc. and Scientific Games Corporation Former Public Company Directorships: Pacific Capital Bancorp and SWS Group, Inc. 18    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement Lydia H. Kennard President and Chief Executive Officer of KDG Construction Consulting Independent Age: 64 Director since: 2013 Committees:Committees •   Audit •   Corporate Responsibility •   Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) Current Public Company Directorships •   Prologis, Inc. •   Healthpeak Properties, Inc. •   AECOM    Business Experience:Experience President and Chief Executive Officer of KDG Construction Consulting, a construction and program management firm, from 2011 to present. Principal of KDG Aviation (formerly, Airport Property Ventures, LLC,LLC), a developer and operator of aviation facilities, from 2007 to present. Principal of 3801-3825 N. Mission Rd., LA, LLC, a single-purpose real estate entity from 2015 to present. Executive Director of Los Angeles World Airports, from 1999 to 2003, and again from 2005 to 2007. Member of the California Air Resources Board from 2004 to 2011. Skills and Qualifications:Qualifications Ms. Kennard’s over 3040 years of executive and operational experience in aviation, construction management and real estate development enables her to contribute to the board her leadership skills and her critical insights into the operational requirements of a large public company. As a result of her former involvement with the California Air Resources Board, she is able to share her understanding of environmental management and pollution control matters, which is valuable in enhancing the board’s insight with respect to our company’s environmental policies and practices. She holds a B.A. in Urban Planning and Management from Stanford University, a Master in City Planning from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.   Current Public Company Directorships: Prologis, Inc. and HCP, Inc.   Dustan E. McCoy Former Public Company Directorships:(Independent) Age: 71                 Director Since:  Intermec, Inc. and URS Corporation2007       Dustan E. McCoy   Lead Independent Director of the Board of Freeport-McMoRan Inc.; Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brunswick Corporation   Independent Age: 69 Director since: 2007 Committees:Committees •   Compensation (Chair)(Chair) •   Audit •   Corporate Responsibility   Current Public Company Directorships •   Louisiana-Pacific Corporation •   YETI Holdings, Inc.    Business Experience:Experience Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brunswick Corporation, a leading, publicly traded, global manufacturer and marketer of recreation products including marine engines, boats, fitness equipment and billiards equipment, having held such positions from December 2005 to February 2016. President of the Brunswick Boat Group from 2000 until 2005. Joined Brunswick in 1999 as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining Brunswick, Mr. McCoy served as Executive Vice President and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Witco Corporation, a publicly traded specialty chemical products company, with operating responsibilitycompany. Prior to joining Witco, he served for a variety of global businesses and functions and served15 years as Senior Vice President, GeneralAssociate Counsel and Corporate Secretary. for Ashland Oil Company. Skills and Qualifications:Qualifications Mr. McCoy’s significant leadership and management experience in his previous role as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brunswick Corporation, his vast experience as a director of publicly traded companies, and his comprehensive knowledge of the company make him highly qualified to serve as our Lead Independent Director. Additionally, Mr. McCoy’s extensive experience in legal and compliance matters generally, and more specifically his experience in corporate governance and disclosure matters for publicly traded companies makes him well-suited to serve on the boardboard. Mr. McCoy has also had over 20 years of directors.experience in the natural resources and extractive industry with Ashland Oil and as Chairman of the Board of a private quarry business. Mr. McCoy’s executive management experience provides him with a broad understanding of the operational, financial and strategic issues facing large global mining companies, enabling him to chair our compensation committee and to provide valuable strategic advice to the board and management in advancing the company’s interests. He holds a B.A. in Political Science from Eastern Kentucky University and a J.D. from Salmon P. Chase College of Law at Northern Kentucky University.   Current Public Company Directorships: Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and YETI Holdings, Inc. Former Public Company Directorships:Brunswick Corporation   26Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement19 John J. Stephens (Independent)   Age: 61                 Director Since: 2019   Retired Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of AT&T Inc. Committee •   Audit (Chair) Business Experience Retired Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AT&T Inc., a publicly traded, diversified global leader in telecommunications, media and entertainment, and technology, from June 2011 to March 2021. Senior Vice President and Controller of AT&T Inc. from June 2001 to June 2011, Vice President – Taxes from August 2000 to June 2001, Managing Director – Taxes from December 1995 to August 2000, and Director-Federal Taxes from 1992 to 1995. Prior to joining AT&T in 1992, he held a variety of roles in public accounting. Skills and Qualifications Mr. Stephens brings to the board over 35 years of accounting and finance expertise, including experience in matters of financial planning, corporate development, accounting and accounting policy, tax, auditing, treasury, investor relations, corporate real estate, business planning, and financial, operational, and regulatory reporting. His executive management experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company and his vast experience in financial and accounting matters, international business and affairs, mergers, acquisitions and other major corporate transactions enable him to provide valuable perspectives on operational, financial and strategic matters before the board. He holds a B.S.B.A. in Accounting from Rockhurst University and a J.D. from St. Louis University School of Law. Frances Fragos Townsend(Independent) Age: 59                 Director Since: 2013       Executive Vice President for Corporate                   Affairs at Activision Blizzard Committees •   Corporate Responsibility (Chair) •   Compensation Current Public Company Directorships •   Chubb Limited Former Public Company Directorship •   Scientific Games Corporation •   SciPlay Corporation •   The Western Union Company Business Experience Executive Vice President for Corporate Affairs at Activision Blizzard (ATVI), a leading global developer and publisher of Worldwide Government, Legalinteractive entertainment, from December 2020 to present. Emeritus Vice Chairman, General Counsel and Business AffairsChief Administrative Officer at MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated Independent Age: 57 Director since: 2013 Committees: •   Corporate Responsibility  (Chair) •   Compensation Business Experience: from July 2020 through December 2020, Executive Vice President offor Worldwide Government, Legal and Business Affairs, at MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporatedworking across MacAndrew’s portfolio companies focusing on international, legal, compliance and business development issues, from 2013 to present2020, and Senior Vice President from 2010 to 2013. Partner at Baker Botts L.L.P. from 2009 to 2010. Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Advisor to President George W. Bush from 2005 until 2008 and Chair of the Homeland Security Council from 2004 to 2008. Deputy Assistant to President George W. Bush and Deputy National Security Advisor for Combatting Terrorism from 2003 until 2004. Prior to serving the President, Ms. Townsend was the first Assistant Commandant for Intelligence for the U.S. Coast Guard. Before that, Ms. Townsend spent 13 years at the U.S. Department of Justice under the administrations of President George H.W. Bush, President William J. Clinton and President George W. Bush. Ms. Townsend is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Skills and Qualifications:Qualifications Ms. Townsend brings to the board over 25 years of domestic and international experience in legal, law enforcement and security.security sectors, including a strong background in strategic planning, intelligence matters and domestic and international affairs. Her extensive public policy, government, regulatory and regulatorylegal experience enables her to provide valuable insight with respect to complex international and regulatory matters addressed at the board level. She holds a B.A. in Political Science and a B.S. in Psychology from American University and a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law.   Current Public Company Directorships: Scientific Games Corporation and The Western Union Company Former Public Company Directorships: SIGA Technologies, Inc.   20Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement27 EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION   Compensation Discussion and Analysis       28           Summary Compensation Table       43       Executive Summary     29     2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards     45   Executive Compensation Philosophy     32     Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2020     46   Principal Components of Executive Compensation     33     2020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested     47   Post-Termination Compensation     39     Nonqualified Deferred Compensation     48   Compensation Processes and Policies     40     Pension Benefits     49   Compensation Committee Report     42     Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control     53   Executive Compensation Tables         43         CEO Pay Ratio         54       Compensation Discussion and Analysis This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, describes and analyzes our executive compensation philosophy and program in the context of the compensation paid during the last fiscal year to our chiefCEO, our CFO, and our one other executive officer our chief financial officer, and each of our two other executive officers during 20182020 (collectively referred to as our named executive officers or NEOs). Our named executive officers for 2018 are:, namely:     Name      Title     Richard C. Adkerson    Vice Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer   Kathleen L. Quirk    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Harry M. “Red” Conger, IVIV*    Former President and Chief Operating Officer – Americas * Mr. Conger retired from the company effective September 1, 2020.   Michael J. ArnoldGlossary of CD&A Terms:    Former Executive Vice President AIP annual incentive program PSU performance share unit committee compensation committee ROI return on investment Dodd Frank Act Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Chief Administrative OfficerConsumer Protection Act RSU restricted stock unit ECAP employee capital accumulation program SEC Securities and Exchange Commission ESG environmental, social and governance SECAP supplemental executive capital accumulation plan Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended SERP supplemental executive retirement plan FW Cook Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. SRP supplemental retirement plan GAAP generally accepted accounting principles in the United States TRIR total reportable incident rate LTIP long-term incentive program TSR total stockholder return NEO named executive officer This CD&A is organized into five sections:28    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Executive Summary 2020 Performance Highlights   8th Best-performing stock in S&P 500 3.2B lbs Consolidated sales of copper 0.9M oz Consolidated sales of gold $599M Net income attributable to common stock $3.0B Operating cash flows $2.0B Capital expenditures $1.75B Decrease in net debt(*) $3.7B Consolidated cash at year end 2020 Operational Highlights • Team demonstrated resilience in managing uncertain business environment • Safety statistics, measured by incident rates, met our targets • Solid cost and capital management • Achieved significant project execution milestones ¡   Grasberg underground reached 68% of annual targeted metal run rate ¡   Completed Lone Star project; ramp-up is on schedule Financial Highlights • Strong cash flow generation • Opportunistic debt refinancing to extend maturities • Meaningful reduction in net debt(*) • Established attractive foundation for future growth • 2020 performance set stage for board in early 2021 to reinstate dividend on common stock and adopt a new performance-based financial policy Stock Performance • Total return of 99% for 2020 • Top performing stock compared to 8-member performance peer group • 8th best-performing stock in S&P 500 Delivered on ESG Commitments • Published inaugural climate report and established 2030 GHG emissions reduction target for the Americas • Joined United Nations Global Compact • Active leadership role in development of Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management • Committed to achieving the Copper Mark at all copper producing sites; to date, six sites have been awarded the Copper Mark (Cerro Verde, El Abra, Atlantic Copper, Miami, Morenci and El Paso) • Published water report (*) Net debt equals consolidated debt less consolidated cash. Executive Summary (page 22)COVID-19 Response We are deeply committed to supporting the health, safety and well-being of our people, which was further emphasized as the COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for our workforce and their families, our host communities and indigenous neighbors, and for society at large. Our global team responded to these challenges in an exceptional fashion, safeguarding our people, communities and assets as we executed and delivered on our clearly defined strategy. Further, our COVID-19 response included the following actions in connection with our executive compensation program:   Executive Compensation Philosophy (page 24) • Executive officer salary reductions. To reduce costs and conserve cash during the period of uncertainty resulting from low copper prices and the economic downturn in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, senior management recommended and the committee approved a 25% reduction in the base salaries of Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk effective May 1, 2020 through the remainder of 2020, with only 10% of the reduced base salary payable in cash and the remainder paid in an award of RSUs vesting on December 31, 2020.   Overview of Principal Components of Executive Compensation (page 25) Post-Termination Compensation (page 31) Compensation Processes and Policies (page 33) • Reduction of AIP payments / No adjustment to performance metrics. The committee did not adjust any of the performance targets or results under our AIP or LTIP, instead electing to exercise negative discretion to reduce the 2020 incentive awards under our AIP in part due to our COVID-related cost reductions.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    2129 2020 Changes to Executive Summary Performance HighlightsCompensation Program   We achieved strong and safe operating results and continued to execute our plans with operating and capital discipline. • Increased Mr. Adkerson’s target LTIP performance-based awards. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, in February 2020, as part of its annual review of executive compensation, the committee considered the market analysis prepared by FW Cook, its independent compensation consultant, regarding the competitive positioning of the compensation of our executive officers. The committee determined that an increase in Mr. Adkerson’s compensation was appropriate given his position relative to the S&P 250 and S&P 500 comparator groups, and also that this increase should be reflected solely in the target value of his performance-based compensation. Accordingly, Mr. Adkerson’s target LTIP award value was increased by $1 million, with the total target LTIP award value allocated entirely to performance-based awards (67% to PSUs and 33% to stock options). This increase positioned his target direct compensation closer to the median of the S&P 250 and between the 50th and 75th percentile of the S&P 500, which the committee believes is aligned with our compensation philosophy and commensurate with Mr. Adkerson’s contributions, capabilities and experience.   We continued to strengthen our balance sheet with 2018year-end debt, net of cash, declining to $6.9 billion (representing a $13.3 billion decrease in debt, net of cash, since the start of 2016) and strong financial metrics. In recognition of our company’s improved financial strength, in May 2018, we began paying a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share on our common stock. In December 2018, we completed our transaction with the Indonesian government to provide long-term stability to our operations in Indonesia after complex negotiations spanning seven years. We commenced development of our new Lone Star copper project in eastern Arizona. We added new reserves to our portfolio to extend mine lives and enhance future growth options. We maintained our commitment to providing the necessary management and financial resources to our sustainability and environmental programs, recognizing that these programs are paramount to our long-term success. • Updated executive change in control severance plan. In May 2020, upon the recommendation of the committee following input from FW Cook, the board adopted an updated executive change in control severance plan, which replaced our prior plan adopted in 2004 and was last amended in 2008. The updated plan provides severance benefits to those executive officers and other key members of senior management not covered under existing agreements, including Mr. Adkerson. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 53 for more information regarding the terms of the updated plan. Stockholder Engagement and Continued Evolution of Our Executive Compensation ProgramSay-on-Pay Our board has a long history of seeking our stockholders’ feedback regarding our practices, including our executive compensation program, and highly values the insights we receive through this open dialogue. OverAnnually, members of our board, including the past two years,chair of the board ledcommittee, and senior management conduct a multi-stage stockholder engagement program to ensure we understand the continuationperspectives and expectations of this processour stockholders. During 2020, we sought meetings with 30 stockholders representing 52% of using stockholder feedback to informour outstanding common stock, and engaged with 19 stockholders representing 42% of our outstanding common stock. In these meetings, the board’skey compensation-related topics we discussed with stockholders included our compensation program structure and practices, the company’s compensation actions in response to potential changes to our long-term program. Most recently, based on stockholderthe COVID-19 pandemic, and how ESG is considered in compensation. During these meetings, we received feedback discussed above, our review of current market practices, as well as our committee’s continual evaluationin support of our program in orderexecutive compensation programs. See “Stakeholder Engagement” on page 6 for a full description of our comprehensive engagement efforts. Our stockholders also have the opportunity each year to ensure we appropriately aligncast an advisory “say-on-pay” vote on our executives’ incentives withNEO’s compensation. At our long-term strategy, we adopted a new LTI program structure for 2018. In thelead-up to the 20182020 annual meeting, we had engagement calls with severala majority of our stockholders who were generally supportive(87%) expressed support for our executive compensation programs. Stockholder engagement and the outcome of our compensation program’s structure, including the revised structure of our performance share unit program (using ROI and maintaining relative TSR as a modifier). We adopted this new structure following a significant stockholder engagement initiative in 2017, which we initiated after our 2017annual say-on-pay proposal passed with only 52% support. The committee was pleasedvote will continue to seeinform our compensation decisions. Our stockholders have thesay-on-pay outcome improve opportunity to over 86%vote on our executive compensation at our 2018the annual meeting. What We Heard in 2017 and How We Refined Our Compensation Program in 2018   Compensation Element Stockholder Feedback Direct Response   Performance Share Units (PSUs)   (50% of LTI award) Frequently cited ROI as a long-term metric to consider Adopted ROI metric Generally supported TSR modifier Maintained relative TSR modifier Preferred a metric that applied overthree-year performance period Vesting based on metric over three-year performance period   Other Equity Vehicles   (50% of LTI award) Suggested awarding RSUs in place of a portion of stock options Adjusted program to include RSUs (25% of LTI award) and stock options (now 25% of LTI award instead of 50%) The revised equity mix in our LTI program is consistent with S&P 500 companies, which have an average mix of 53% PSUs, 22% stock options and 25% RSUs. The committee believes these compensation program changes enhance the alignment between our incentive program and our evolving business, and are directly responsive to the concerns cited by our stockholders.meeting (see Proposal No. 3 on page 58 for more information).   2230    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement 2020 Target Direct Compensation Our executive compensation program is significantly performance-based – linking executive pay, company performance and results for stockholders – and is appropriately balanced with short- and long-term measures. The primary components of our executive compensation program are (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive awards and (3) long-term incentive awards (which we collectively refer to as our executives’ “direct compensation”). The annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards, which comprise 88% of our CEO’s target direct compensation, are at-risk and based on measurable performance objectives and increases in our stock price. 2021 Senior Management and Compensation Structure In February 2021, in connection with Mr. Ford’s announcement of his upcoming retirement from our board and the position of non-executive chairman, the board appointed Mr. Adkerson chairman of the board and CEO, and Ms. Quirk assumed the role of president in addition to her CFO responsibilities. In connection with these new appointments and the expanded duties and responsibilities for each executive, the committee increased the target compensation program is significantly performance-based – linking executive pay, company performancefor Mr. Adkerson and resultsMs. Quirk for stockholders –2021, and is appropriately balanced with short- and long-term measures. The primary components of our executive compensation program are (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive awards and (3) long-term incentive awards (which we collectively refer to as our executives’ “direct compensation”). The annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards, which comprise the majority of our executives’ target direct compensation, areat-risk, withdetermined that a significantgreater percentage of the target direct compensation (70% for our CEO) based on measureable performance objectives, both annual and long-term (PSUs), and increases in our stock price (stock options). Using these compensation components, in February 2018 the committee established the followingMr. Adkerson’s target compensation framework for our executive officers for 2018: 2018 Target Compensation Frameworkshould be allocated to performance-based compensation, as follows:   Executive    Annual Base Salary        Target Cash   Annual Incentive (0-175%)       Target LTI Award Values            PSUs      Options      RSUs      Total Target Direct   Compensation     Mr. Adkerson      $1,600,000          $2,400,000           $4,000,000        $2,000,000      $ 2,000,000        $12,000,000      Ms. Quirk      800,000          1,400,000           2,000,000        1,000,000        1,000,000        6,200,000      Mr. Conger      550,000          962,500           1,375,000        687,500        687,500        4,262,500      Mr. Arnold      550,000          962,500           1,375,000        687,500        687,500        4,262,500      Chief Executive Officer                   Allocation of Target LTIP       Executive   2021   Annual Base   Salary   2021   Target Cash   Annual Incentive   2021   Target LTIP   Grant Date Value   PSUs   Options   RSUs   2021 Total Target Direct   Compensation     Mr. Adkerson       $1,800,000         $2,700,000         $10,000,000             70%         15%         15%         $14,500,000     Ms. Quirk       1,000,000       1,500,000       4,500,000           50%         25%         25%         7,000,000 Compensation Governance and Best Practices Our executive compensation program is designed and managed by the independent compensation committee of our board. Structuring a compensation program is a complex process that includes weighing various possible incentives and associated risks, assessing the competitive environment for executive talent, and understanding the views and perspectives of various constituencies. The committee is committedIn addition to incorporating stockholder views in its review process. Asseeking input from stockholders as noted above, the committee is aware of stockholder views through the broad feedback mechanism of our annualsay-on-pay vote on executive compensation, but also actively solicits information through direct conversations with investors that allow the committee to gather more actionable insights. The committee also seeks input from its independent compensation consultant and strives to incorporate compensation “best practices” into our program design.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    2331 Below is a summary of the compensation governance practices to which we are committed and which we believe enhance the performance of the company and long-term value for stockholders, and the practices that we reject. We Are Committed To:     ✓Responding to Stockholder Feedback – Since 2014, the committee has actively engagedengages with our investors in order to fully understand our stockholders’ perspectives regarding our executive compensation program and has taken action in response to concerns raised. Most recently, we adopted a new LTI program structure for 2018. Considering stockholder feedback and current market practices, the committee adopted an ROI metric, maintained the relative TSR modifier, and replaced a portion of stock options with time vested RSUs.     ✓  Paying for Performance – a significant portion of target direct compensation for our executive officers (70%(88% for our CEO in 2018)2020) isat-risk and tied to performance of our company and increases in our stock price.     ✓  Clawback PoliciesPolicy – we may recover incentive awards paid based on restated financial statements under certain circumstances.     ✓  Assessing Compensation Risks – we regularly assess the risk-reward balance of our compensation programs in order to mitigate undue risks. ✓Independent Advisors – we engage the services of an independent compensation consultant. ✓Annual Say-on-Pay – we conduct an annual say-on-pay vote to allow our stockholders to express their views on our executive compensation every year. ✓Requiring Stock Ownership – we require our executive officers and directors to maintain ownership of our securities through our use of equity-based compensation and our stock ownership guidelines, with Mr. Adkerson required to maintain ownership equal to 6x his base salary.   We Reject:       x  Excise TaxGross-Ups – we do not provide any excise tax gross-ups to our executive officers.       x  Single Trigger Vesting of Equity and Cash Payments– our company’s equity-based awards will only accelerate upon the recipient’s actual or constructive termination of employment within one year of a change of control; similarly, change of control cash payments will only be payable upon the recipient’s actual or constructive termination of employment within one year of a change of control.       x  Hedging of Company Stock – our insider trading policy prohibitswe prohibit our executives and directors from entering into hedging arrangements with respect to our securities.       x  Excessive Pledging of Company Stock – our insider trading policy limitswe limit the ability of our executives and directors to pledge our securities as follows: •   our securities may not be pledged as collateral for a margin loan; •   the executive or director must notify the company prior to execution of the pledge; •   the executive or director must establish that he or she has the financial capacity to repay the loan without resorting to the pledged securities; and •   any shares pledged will not be considered as owned for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines applicable to the executive or the director.securities.   Executive Compensation Philosophy The fundamental principles of our company’s executive compensation philosophy are to:   pay for performance by emphasizing performance-based compensation that balances rewards for both short- and long-term results, align compensation with the interests of stockholders and the strategy of our business, and provide a competitive level of compensation to retain talent. In order to achieve these goals, our committee believes that not only should a significant portion of the executive officers’ compensation be performance-based, but also that such compensation should correspond to the key measures used by our stockholders in assessing our company’s value and driving future growth. Under our executive compensation program, the primary elements of the performance-based pay are (1) the(a) awards under our annual incentive program (AIP),AIP, which uses three categories of performance metrics: (1) financial, (2) operational, safety, environmental and social responsibility metrics to measure performance,(3) ESG, and (2)(b) awards under our LTI program,LTIP, which in 2018 focusedfocus on our achievements with respect to ROI, a key financial metric, (ROI)as well as relative and relativeabsolute TSR for the full performance cycle.and stock price appreciation.   2432    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement Overview of Principal Components of Executive Compensation The principal components of executive officer compensation for 2018 were (1) base salaries, (2) annual incentive awards and (3) LTI awards in the form of PSUs, stock options and RSUs. In addition, we provide our executives with certain personal benefits and perquisites, as well as post-employment compensation. The principal components2020 are summarized as follows:below:   20182020 Executive Compensation Program     Compensation Component       Characteristics     2020 Actions/Results   Base Salary       •  Fixed cash compensation   •  Used to calculate other compensation elements           Effective May 1, 2020, CEO and CFO voluntarily reduced salaries and received only 10% of reduced amounts in cash     Annual Incentive     Program (AIP)AIP         •  Annual variable cash compensation based onpre-established performance metrics   •  Formula-driven plan using the following metrics (weighted as indicated) to determine target and earned awards:                     Financial   - Consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)   - Operating cash flowNet Debt   - Capital expenditures - TotalPT-FI cash distributions             48%40%         Based on level of achievement of the performance metrics, the AIP payout would have been equal to 143.9% of target, but was reduced to 125% of target, as discussed on page 35            Operational   - North America and South Americacopper sales - PT-FI copper sales   - PT-FI gold sales   - North America and South AmericaConsolidated unit net cash costs                 27%35%                    ESG - Safety - TRIR - Sustainability             15% Environmental & Social Responsibility 10%25%             •  Annual cash awards capped at a multiple of base salary (for our CEO in 2018,2020, target = 1.5x150% of base salary; maximum = 1.75x175% of target)               Long-Term   Incentive (LTI)   ProgramLTIP       PSUs •  PSU award (50% of LTI program awards) – payablePayable in shares of stock after a three-year performance period, all of which is at risk based on performance measured by a combination of achievement of ROI metrics during the performance period and our relative TSR   -•  Range of payout of the PSUs is 0% to 225% depending on our achievement of the performance goals   •  Represent the largest component of our LTIP awards (67% for our CEO and 50% for our other NEOs) 2018-2020 PSUs paid out at 116% of target Stock options (25% of LTI program awards) – vestOptions •  Vest ratably over a three-year period following date of grant, and deliver value only to the extent that our stock price appreciates above the price on the grant date RSUs   •  RSU award (25% of LTI program awards) – vestVest ratably over a three-year period following date of grant and provide retentive elements and alignment with stockholder interests     Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    2533 Using these compensation components, in February 2020 the committee established the following target compensation framework for our executive officers for 2020: 2020 Target Compensation Framework   Executive    Annual Base Salary        Target Cash   Annual Incentive     Target LTIP Award Values            PSUs      Options      RSUs      Total Target Direct   Compensation       Mr. Adkerson      $1,600,000          $2,400,000           $6,000,000        $3,000,000        —        $13,000,000        Ms. Quirk      800,000          1,400,000           2,000,000        1,000,000      $ 1,000,000        6,200,000        Mr. Conger      550,000          962,500           1,375,000        687,500        687,500        4,262,500      Base Salaries     How base salaries support our compensation philosophy and objectives:     •  Base salaries helpHelps us meet the objective of attracting and retaining the key talent and executive officerstalent needed to manage our business successfully.   •  Fixed compensation inRepresents the form of base salary represents a smallsmallest portion of our executive officers’ target compensation, reflecting our goal to allocate morea significant majority of compensation to the performance-based elements of the total compensation package.   •  Individual base salary amounts reflectReflects our committee’s judgment with respect to each executive officer’s responsibilities, performance, and work experience as well as market data.   Until the leadership changes in February 2021, our NEO base salaries had remained unchanged since 2017. In May 2020, in support of the company’s efforts to reduce costs and conserve cash during the period of uncertainty resulting from low copper prices and the economic downturn in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, senior management recommended and the committee approved a 25% reduction in the base salaries of Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk effective May 1, 2020, through the remainder of 2020. In addition, each executive agreed that only 10% of the reduced base salary would be paid in cash to cover benefit premiums and other scheduled payroll deductions, with the remainder paid in an award of RSUs vesting on December 31, 2020. Accordingly, on May 15, 2020, Mr. Adkerson received a grant of 82,663 RSUs and Ms. Quirk received a grant of 41,331 RSUs.   2018 Highlights: Base Salaries   No changes to any of our executives’ base salaries in 2018. 34    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Annual Incentive AwardsProgram   How the overall design of the AIP supports our compensation philosophy and objectives:     •  Our AIP is designed to provideProvides short-term performance-based cash awards to our executive officers, each of whose performance has a significant impact on our financial stability, profitability and future growth.   •  Our AIP encourages the alignment of executive management with stockholder objectives. •  The 2018 AIP’s financialFinancial and operational metrics that reflect our annual business goals and objectives, while its inclusion ofas well as ESG metrics that promote critical goals directly aligned with our commitment to safety and environmental and social responsibility metrics promote the goals of operating the business in a safesustainable and responsible manner.copper mining for all stakeholders.   •  Our focusFocus on generating cash flows to reduce debt and strengthen our balance sheet closely aligns management and stockholder interests.     26    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement General Structure of the AIP for 2018. For 2018, the committee established target performance goals in three categories that it believes effectively measure the performance of the company, with each category accounting for a specific percentage of the target award. In these categories, the committee chose the following metrics to measure performance:  Performance Category Performance Metrics Purpose Financial Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Reflects our goal of generating cash flows Operating Cash Flow Reflects our goal of generating cash flows Capital Expenditures Reflects our focus on capital discipline and our goal of strengthening our balance sheet TotalPT-FI Cash Distributions Reflects our goal of generating cash flows Operational North America and South America Copper Sales Reflects our goal of generating cash flows PT-FI Gold Sales Reflects our goal of generating cash flows North America and South America Unit Net Cash Costs Reflects our goal of operating efficiently and controlling production costs Safety and Environmental/Social Responsibility Safety Aligns with our highest priority – safety of our people Environmental & Social Responsibility Supports our significant focus on working toward sustainable development Following the end of the year, each performance metric is evaluated against the target goal, with payout levels defined for threshold, target and maximum levels of performance. If performance falls within these levels, a sliding scale is used to determine the appropriate payout.     2018   2020 Highlights: Annual Incentive ProgramAIP     •  Under the 2018 AIP, each executive had a target award based on a multiple of salary, and was eligible to earn an annual cash award based on the company’s performance relative to defined goals established by the committee in February 2018.Payout Opportunities:   o  The target annual incentive award for Mr. Adkerson was 150% of base salary, or $2.4 million.   o  The target annual incentive award for each of Ms. Quirk and Messrs.Mr. Conger and Arnold was 175% of base salary.   o  Annual cash incentive payments ranging from 50% of target for threshold performance started at 50%to 175% of target withfor maximum performance, earning 175% of target, although the committee retained the discretion to reduce the payment to 0% of target.   •  Based on the company’s performance relative to thepre-established goals, the executives earned a payout amount equal to 89.4% of the target award. Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement27 Review of 2018 AIP Results. In February 2019, the committee evaluated the company’s performance against the AIP targets, which were as follows: Performance Category     Performance Metrics     Weighting      Threshold      Target      Maximum       Weighted Payout as a % of Target   Financial   Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA ($ in billions)   15%       $6.00        $7.50        $9.00       13.4%        Actual $7.17              Operating Cash Flow ($ in billions)   8%         $4.20        $5.30        $6.40       0.0%        Actual $3.86                   Capital Expenditures ($ in billions)   10%       $2.40        $2.10        $1.80       13.2%             Actual $1.97         TotalPT-FI Cash Distributions ($ in billions)     15%       $1.00        $2.00        $2.50       14.4%        Actual $1.93            Operational   North America and South America Copper Sales (billion pounds)     12%       2.40        2.70        2.95       11.6%                Actual         2.68              PT-FI Gold Sales (million ounces)   7.5%      1.80        2.40        2.70       7.3%              Actual         2.37              North America and South America Unit Net Cash Costs ($/pound)     7.5%      $1.82        $1.65        $1.50       4.9%        Actual         $1.77                    Safety   Total Reportable Incident Rate (TRIR)   15%       0.88        0.70        0.63       14.6%                Actual         0.71            Environmental/Social Responsibility   Environmental/Social Responsibility (Score)   10%       1        3        5       10.0%             Actual 3                      Formulaic Performance Result Total       89.4%   2018 Metrics and Goals In establishing the metrics and goals - in February 2018,2020, the committee chose:   •  metricso  Metrics designed to focus our executives’ efforts on the critical elements of the company’s strategic plans for 20182020 – focusing on production, cost and capital discipline, and generating cash flows, while strengthening the balance sheet and refocusing our business on our leading position in the global copper industry; and   •  targeto  Target goals that were consistent with the company’s budgetdisclosed plan for 2020 and rigorous in the year.context of our expectation that this would be a transition year as PT-FI continued to ramp-up production from its underground ore bodies in Indonesia. •  Results: Based on the company’s performance relative to the pre-established goals, the executives earned a payout amount equal to 143.9% of the target award, however given the COVID-related cost reductions and the fatalities that occurred during the year, management recommended and the committee exercised negative discretion in approving the reduction of the AIP payouts to 125% of the target award. The committee also approvedGeneral Structure of the methodAIP and Results for calculating results under each metric. In connection with the committee’s review of our results in early 2019,2020. For 2020, the committee made no adjustmentsestablished target performance goals in three categories that it believes effectively measure the performance of the company, with each category accounting for a specific percentage of the target award. Within each category, the committee then chose specific metrics to the reported results under the financial metrics. In connection with the calculation of unit net cash costs per pound of copper, we use the“by-product” method in our calculation in our annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.measure performance.   28Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement35   Performance Category   Performance Metrics(*)    Weighting     Threshold       Target        Maximum    Weighted Payout as a % of Target   Link to Strategic Goals Financial (40%)   Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA ($ in billions)     15%     $1.7        $2.7      $3.7   26.25%   Generating cash flows       Actual $4.2          Net Debt ($ in billions)   15%     $9.8        $8.8      $7.8   26.25%       Actual $6.1          Capital Expenditures ($ in billions)   10%         $3.1              $2.8          $2.4     17.50%   Focus on capital discipline and strengthening our balance sheet         Actual $1.3          Operational (35%)   Americas Copper Sales (billion pounds)     10%     2.4        2.7      3.0   5.00%   Generating cash flows       Actual 2.4                                               PT-FI Copper Sales (million pounds)   7.5%     675        750      825   11.55%       Actual 804.0                             PT-FI Gold Sales (thousand ounces)   7.5%     675        775      875   11.34%       Actual 843.3              Consolidated Unit Net Cash Costs ($/pound)   10%     $1.90        $1.75      $1.60   17.50%   Operating efficiently and controlling production costs         Actual $1.48        ESG (25%)   Safety - TRIR   15%     0.88        0.70      0.63   16.61%   Aligns with our highest priority – safety of our people         Actual     0.69                Sustainability (Score)(**)   10%     1           3      5   11.88%   Aligns with our ESG commitments               Actual     3.5                          Formulaic Performance Result Total       143.9%       Under this method, gold, molybdenum and other metal revenues at copper mines are reflected as credits against site production and delivery costs. Our calculation(*) See Annex A for information regarding the methodology we use to measure certain of consolidated unit net cash costs per pound of copper excludes noncash and other costs, including stock-based compensation costs,start-up costs, inventory adjustments, long-lived asset impairments, restructuring and/or unusual charges. The committee determined that the company performed above the target level for the capital expenditures metric, just below threshold for the operating cash flow metric, and just below target for each of the other financial and operational metrics. The consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) metric is anon-GAAP measure determined in accordance with the covenant calculation in the company’s bank credit facility. Please refer toAnnex A to this proxy statement forperformance metrics, including a reconciliation and other information regarding our calculation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA. With regard to the safety metric, the company’s TRIR resulted in a payout just below target for that metric. With regard to the environmental and social responsibility metric, the committee evaluated the company’s performance(**) We evaluate sustainability relative to a scorecard it approved in February 2018. The committee considered the measuring: environmental performance, with respectreference to environmental events and penalties, reportable spills and releases, and notices of violation. With regardviolation, and • social responsibility, with reference to the company’s further integration of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights into our programs and performance with respect to our company-wide goal of incurring zerogross human rights violations at our operations caused by employees or contractors as reported in our Annual Report on Sustainability, investment in community programs, completion of third-party assurance of our sustainability programs according to the ICMM Assurance Procedure, and stakeholder feedback and recognition of our sustainability programs. As noted above, despite achieving performance resulting in a payout of 143.9% of target, management recommended and the committee exercised negative discretion in approving a decrease in the AIP payout for our executives to 125% of target. 36    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Changes to 2021 AIP Performance Metrics. In February 2021, the committee established target performance goals for 2021 in the same three categories used in 2020, but altered the weighting and some of the performance metrics within each category, effectively simplifying the metrics, as follows: (1) Financial (37.5%): consolidated adjusted EBITDA and capital expenditures; (2) Operational (37.5%): copper sales, gold sales and consolidated unit net cash cost; and (3) ESG (25%): the safety TRIR metric remains and in addition to the social responsibility category, the committee considered further integration of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights into our programs and performance with respect to our company-wide goal of incurring zerogrosssustainability metrics used in prior years (environment, human rights violations at our operations caused by employees or contractors as reported in our annual Working Toward Sustainable Development Report, investment in community programs, completion of third-party assurance of our sustainability programs according to the International Council on Mining and Metals Assurance Procedure,communities), added climate, tailings management, and stakeholder feedbackworkforce inclusion and recognition of our sustainability programs. As a result of its assessment, the committee determined that the executives had earned 100% of the target level of the environmental/social responsibility metric.diversity priorities. Long-Term Incentive (LTI) AwardsProgram     How our LTILTIP awards support our compensation philosophy and objectives:     •  LTI awards are a variableVariable component of compensation intended to reward our executivesexecutive officers for the company’s success in achieving sustained, long-term profitability and increases in stock value.   •  PSUs granted in February 2018 pay out2020 are earned based in part on our achievement of cumulative ROI goals and in part on our relative TSR compared to our peers over a three-year performance period. This design directly links our executives’ earnings to our performance and stockholders’ returns.   •  Stock options align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, as the stock option’sexecutive only receives value is dependent on the performance ofif our stock price.price increases from the date of grant. Our committee believes that stock options are an effective performance-based compensation vehicle that links executive compensation to stockholder return.   • Equity-based LTI awards alsoRSUs strengthen focus on stock price performance and encourage executive ownership of our stock.          20182020 Highlights: LTI ProgramLTIP          •   TotalFor 2020, our NEOs total target LTI award values for each executive are based on a multiple of 5x salary.awards were allocated as follows:     • As discussed in detail in the “Executive Summary” on page 22, in response to stockholder feedback and current market practices, the committee revised the design of our LTI program in 2018 as follows:     ◾   PSUs (50% of LTI program awards) – payable in shares of stock after a three-year performance period which awardand is entirely at risk based on performance measured against cumulative ROI goals set at the beginning of the performance period ROI and a relative TSR modifier.       ¡o Cumulative ROI target is 9%, with threshold goal equal to 6% and maximum goal equal to 20%, with preliminary payouts based on this metric ranging from 0% to 200% of the target awardaward.       ✓ In establishing the ROI target, which the committee believes represented a rigorous target, the committee considered the most recent three-year ROI average of 6.64%12.82% and the most recent five-year ROI average of 7.25%8.93%, and also the weighted average cost of capital, which was approximately 8%, and ROI forecasts at the time of the PSU award.     Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    2937   ¡o The “TSR modifier” operates similarly to our 2017 PSUs, resulting in an increaseincreases or decrease todecreases the preliminary payout ofby up to 25% of the target award based on our TSR over the performance period compared to the TSR of the eight-company peer group listed on page 33)40.       FCX TSR Rank      Impact on Preliminary Earned PSUs       1-2        +25%       3-4        +12.5%       5        No Change       6-7        -12.5%       8-9        -25%       ¡o Overall range of payout of the PSUs is 0% to 225% of the target award depending on our achievement of the performance goals.       ◾   Stock Options (25% of LTI program awards) – vest ratably over a three-year period following date of grant.       ◾   RSUs (25% of LTI program awards) – vest ratably over a three-year period following date of grant.   Determination and Design of 2018 LTI Awards. At its meeting on February 6, 2018, the committee determined the total target LTI award value for each of the executive officers based on five times the executive’s base salary. The committee determined to award 50% of the total target LTI value in PSUs, 25% in stock options and 25% in RSUs, and calculated the number of target PSUs, stock options and RSUs to be granted to each as follows: Executive    Total Target LTI Award Value      Target Number of PSUs Granted      Estimated Value of PSUs on 2/6/18 (1)      Number of Options Granted      Estimated Value of Options on 2/6/18 (2)      Number of RSUs Granted      Estimated Value of RSUs on 2/6/18 (3)     Mr. Adkerson      $   8,000,000              213,000          $   3,991,620              255,000          $   1,999,200              106,500          $   1,995,810       Ms. Quirk          4,000,000              106,500              1,995,810              127,500              999,600              53,000              993,220       Mr. Conger            2,750,000              73,000              1,368,020              87,500              686,000              36,500              684,010     Mr. Arnold          2,750,000              73,000              1,368,020              87,500              686,000              36,500              684,010     (1) The target number of PSUs awarded was determined using the grant date closing stock price of $18.74. The final fair value of the PSUs for accounting purposes based on the Monte Carlo valuation increased to $20.608 and reflected a probable payout of 118% of target, which is the amount reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 36. (2) Based on an estimated Black-Scholes-Merton value of $7.84. (3) Based on grant date closing stock price of $18.74. Settlement of 2017 Performance-Based RSUs and 20162018-2020 PSU Award. In February 2019, the board reviewed the performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Adkerson in 2017, which award would vest when the board (with Mr. Adkerson abstaining) approved the satisfactory resolution ofPT-FI’s long-term mining rights with the Indonesian government. The board noted that on December 21, 2018, we completed a positive transaction with the Indonesian government to provide long-term stability to our operations in Indonesia. As a result, the board (with Mr. Adkerson abstaining) determined that the performance condition had been met and Mr. Adkerson’s 64,000 performance-based RSUs were fully vested. In addition, in February 2019,2021, the committee certified the results of the PSUs granted in 20162018 to our executive officers. These PSUs had a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2018,2020, with vesting and payout based on performance measured by a combination of annual achievement of financial and operational objectives during the performance period and the company’s TSR compared to the TSR of our peer group (see page 3340 for information about the companies in the peer group applicable to the 2016 PSUs)group). The executives could earn between 0% and 200% of the target PSU award based on the level of achievement of these metrics. Following the 30    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement end of the performance period, the committee determined that the three-year average of the achievements with respect to the annual financial and operational goals resulted in a preliminary payout of 117% of the target PSUs. However, becauseBecause our TSR ranked 87th relative to our peer group, the payout percentage was reduced by 25%12.5%, resulting in the executivesexecutive officers earning 92.0%116% of their target PSUs from 2016,2018, as follows:           Achievement of Annual Metrics                      ROI              Grant Date    Three-Year Performance Period    2016   2017   2018   % Earned Before TSR   TSR Peer Ranking    Award %   Earned      Three-Year Performance Period    2018   2019   2020   % Earned Before TSR   TSR Peer Ranking    Award %   Earned   March 30, 2016      2016-2018      138.5 %   126.7 %   85.9 %   117.0 %   8th      92.0 %   February 6, 2018      2018-2020      16.16 %   8.55 %   11.69 %   128.5 %   7th      116 %   The table below details the grant date fair value of the 2017 performance-based RSUs and the 20162018 PSUs as reflected in the applicable “Summary Compensation Table” and the value of the common stock received upon settlement of the awards in February 2019.2021.   Executive    Award Type    Target Number of Performance- Based RSUs and PSUs Granted    Value of Awards Reported as Compensation in Year of Grant    Number of Performance- Based RSUs and PSUs Earned    Realized Value of Awards Target Number of PSUs Granted in 2018     Value of Awards Reported as Compensation in Year of Grant     Number of 2018 PSUs Earned     Realized Value of Awards (1)   Mr. Adkerson    2016 PSUs                600,000              $     6,874,440                    552,000              $     6,546,720           213,000         $5,179,615         247,080     $   6,975,068          2017 Performance-Based RSUs                64,000                    993,280                    64,000                    759,040       Ms. Quirk      2016 PSUs                390,000                    4,468,386                    358,800                    4,255,368           106,500         2,589,807         123,540         3,487,534     Mr. Conger      2016 PSUs                170,000                    1,947,758                    156,400                    1,854,904           73,000         1,775,173         84,680         2,390,516     Mr. Arnold      2016 PSUs                330,000                    3,780,942                    303,600                    3,600,696       Totals                     1,554,000                  $       18,064,806                          1,434,800                  $       17,016,728               392,500         $9,544,595         455,300     $   12,853,118     (1) Reflects the closing price of our common stock ($28.23) on February 1, 2021, the date prior to the committee’s certification of the achievement results of the 2018 PSUs. Personal Benefits and Perquisites In addition to the primary elements of our compensation program discussed above, weWe also provide certain other personal benefits and perquisites to our executive officers.officers to fulfill particular business purposes, which are primarily for efficiency and personal security. In recent years, we have revised this program to discontinue certain benefits, and we will continue to monitor this program and adjust it, as we deem appropriate. The personal benefits and perquisites currently offered are reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table.” Most of these benefits are designed to provide an added level of security tosafeguard our executives and increase travel efficiencies, thereby ensuring the executives’ ready availability on short notice and enabling the executives to focus more time and energy on company matters and performance. Our committee also recognizes the high degree of integration between the personal and professional lives of our executive officers, and these benefits ensure the security of the company’s proprietary information by enabling our executives to conduct business while traveling without concern that company information will be compromised. 38    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Post-Termination Compensation In addition to the compensation received by our executive officers during 20182020 and benefits under ourtax-qualified defined contribution plans, which we provide to all qualified employees, we also provide certain post-employment benefits to our executive officers, including a nonqualified defined contribution plan, as well as supplemental retirement plans and change of control and severance benefits to certain executives.benefits. Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan We maintain an unfunded supplemental nonqualified defined contribution plan (the NQDC plan)SECAP) for the benefit of our executive officers, as well as other employees. The NQDC planSECAP provides those employees whose earnings in a prior year were in excess of the dollar limit under the Internal Revenue Code the ability to defer up to 20% of their base salary after deferrals to the Employee Capital Accumulation Program (ECAP, our 401(k) plan) have ceased as a result of qualified plan limits. The purpose of the NQDC planSECAP is to make total retirement benefits for our employees who Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement31 earn over the qualified plan limits commensurate with those available to other employees as a percentage of pay. For more information regarding these benefits, see the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Retirement Benefit Programs” beginning on page 41.Programs.” Supplemental Retirement Plans We established an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP)(the SERP) for Mr. Adkerson in February 2004. The compensation committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant at the time, approved the SERP, which was then recommended to and approved by our board. In addition, Mr. Conger is a participant in the Freeport Minerals Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (SRP), which is an unfunded, supplemental retirement plan that we assumed in 2007 in connection with our acquisition of Phelps Dodge Corporation. For more information regarding these benefits, see the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Retirement Benefit Programs” beginning on page 41.Programs.” Change ofin Control and Severance Benefits for Continuing Executives We provideIn May 2020, the board adopted an updated executive change in control severance plan for eligible members of senior management, including Mr. Adkerson. In addition, Ms. QuirkQuirk’s employment agreement provides her with contractual protections in the event of certain terminations of employment outside of the change ofin control context, as well as in connection with a change ofin control. In addition, Mr. Conger is an eligible participant in certain severance and change of control severance plans maintained by the company and our subsidiaries for the benefit of officers and employees. We believe that severance protections, particularly in connection with a change ofin control transaction, can play a valuable role in attracting and retaining key executive officers by providing protections commonly provided in the market. In addition, we believe these benefits also serve the company’s and stockholders’ interests by promoting a continuity of management in the context of an actual or threatened change ofin control transaction. The existence of these arrangements does not impact our decisions regarding other components of our executive compensation program, although we consider these severance protections an important part of our executives’ compensation packages. We believe that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change of control transaction would create uncertainty regarding the continued employment of our executive officers. This uncertainty results from the fact that many change of control transactions result in significant organizational changes, particularly at the senior executive level. In order to encourage certain executive officers to remain employed with the company during an important time when their prospects for continued employment following a transaction are often uncertain, we may provide certain executive officers with enhanced severance benefits if their employment is terminated by the company without cause or, in certain cases, by the executive in connection with a change of control. Because we believe that a termination by the executive for good reason may be conceptually the same as a termination by the company without cause, and because we believe that in the context of a change of control, potential acquirers would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive’s employment to avoid paying severance, we believe it is appropriate to provide severance benefits in these circumstances.We do not provide excise taxgross-up protections under any change of control arrangements with our executive officers. We also do not believe that our executive officers should be entitled to receive cash severance benefits merely because a change ofin control transaction occurs.The payment of cash severance benefits is only triggered by an actual or constructive termination of employment following a change ofin control (i.e., a“double trigger” “double trigger”). In addition, our LTILTIP awards, including the stock options, RSUs and PSUs granted to our executives and all of our employees, provide for accelerated vesting of the award following a change ofin control only if the recipient also experiences an actual or constructive termination of employment within one year after a change ofin control.We do not provide excise tax gross-up protections under any change in control arrangements with our executive officers. Ms. Quirk is also entitled to severance benefits under her employment agreement in the event of a termination of employment by the company without cause or by her for good reason. Our committee determined that it is appropriate to continue to provide Ms. Quirk with severance benefits under these circumstances in light of her position with the company and as part of her overall compensation package. For more information regarding these benefits, see the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” beginning on page 44.in Control.”   32Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement39 Compensation Processes and Policies Role of Advisors OurIn 2020, our committee has engaged Pay Governance LLC (Pay Governance)FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant since February 2010.consultant. Consistent with our committee’s longstanding policy, Pay Governance willFW Cook does not provide and has not provided, any services to the company’s management. As required by SEC rules, the committee has assessed the independence of Pay GovernanceFW Cook and concluded that Pay Governance’sits work diddoes not raise any conflicts of interest. A representative of Pay GovernanceFW Cook attends meetings of our committee and communicates with our committee chair between meetings; however, our committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers. Pay GovernanceFW Cook provides various executive compensation services to our committee, including advising our committee on the principal aspects of our executive compensation program and evolving industry practices and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our program design, as discussed in more detail below. Peer Group In March 2016, in connection withThe committee has used the company’s exit from the oil and gas business and refocus of our business on our leading position in the global copper industry, the committee, with input from Pay Governance, developed a newfollowing mining company peer group of peer companies that we use to compare our performance (including for purposes of the PSUs granted since 2016). This2016, and in early 2020 FW Cook and the committee confirmed that this group of peers consists solely of mining companies and is set forth below:was still an appropriate comparator group for performance:     Anglo American plc     Antofagasta plc     BHP BillitonGroup Limited     Glencore Xstrata plc     Rio Tinto plc     Southern Copper Corporation     Teck Resources Limited     Vale S.A.   In February 2018, with input from Pay Governance,Although the compensation committee determined that while thethis mining company peer group above is appropriate for measuring our performance, because it is substantially comprised ofnon-U.S. based companies, the committee and FW Cook do not believe it is not an appropriate peer group for compensation comparisons for the following reasons: (1) international companies have significantly different pay structures than U.S. based companies, and (2) international companies have different reporting requirements making it difficult to obtain comparable data. Accordingly, when performing its market assessments to evaluate our executive compensation program and pay levels, the committee concluded thatand FW Cook consider data from the S&P 250 was an appropriate peer group for purposes of comparing our compensation programs and pay levels.the S&P 500. Stock Ownership We believe that it is important for our executive officers to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. With that philosophy in mind, we have structured our compensation program to ensure that a portion of our executive officers’ compensation is delivered in the form of equity, such as stock options, PSUs, and beginning in 2018, RSUs.equity. Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement33 Under our stock ownership guidelines, each of our executive officers is required to maintain ownership of company stock valued at a certain multiple of base salary. Shares that the executive has pledged, shares held by a spouse or children, and shares due upon the vesting of PSUs are not counted as shares “owned” for purposes of the guidelines. Further, for purposes of assessing compliance in 2020, the voluntary salary reductions did not impact the ownership requirements. As of April 15, 2019, all ofDecember 31, 2020, our NEOs exceedcurrent executive officers exceeded their target ownership levels.     Executive      Current Ownership Requirement      Actual Ownership Level as of April 15, 2019December 31, 2020 (Using1-year3-year trailing average stock price)       Mr. Adkerson        6x base salary        29x33.1x base salary       Ms. Quirk        3x base salary        17x base salary   Mr. Conger 3x base salary   6x base salary   Mr. Arnold 3x base salary 10x21.5x base salary   These ownership levels reflect the individual commitments of our executivesexecutive officers to align their interests with those of our stockholders and incentivize our executives to maximize the value of our stock over the long-term.stockholders. For more information regarding these guidelines and the current stock holdings of our executive officers, please see the section titled “Stock OwnershipOwnership.” 40    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Hedging and Pledging Policies Our insider trading policy prohibits our executive officers and directors from entering into any hedging arrangements with respect to our securities. Specifically, the policy defines “insiders” as members of Directorsthe board, our officers and Executive Officers”certain employees and consultants who are likely to be in possession of material nonpublic information due to the nature of their work, and contains the following prohibition: Transactions in publicly traded options are generally short-term in nature and may give the public the perception that insiders are not focused on page 56.the long-term performance of the Company. Certain forms of hedging transactions are complex, may be perceived negatively by the public and can present unique insider trading risks. Accordingly, insiders are prohibited from engaging in such transactions. Our insider trading policy also limits the ability of our executives and directors to pledge our securities as follows: our securities may not be pledged as collateral for a margin loan; the executive or director must notify the company prior to execution of the pledge; the executive or director must establish that he or she has the financial capacity to repay the loan without resorting to the pledged securities; and any shares pledged will not be considered as owned for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines applicable to the executive or the director. Compensation Clawback Policy Our committee has adopted an incentive compensation clawback policy that would enable the company to clawback all or a portion of incentive compensation in the event an executive’s misconduct causes the company to issue a restatement of its financial statements, to the extent that such executive’s incentive compensation was based on the misstated financials. Our committee will amend the clawback policy, as needed, once the SEC adopts the final implementing rules regarding compensation clawbacks mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street ReformAct. Equity Grant Timing Practices The committee’s policy is to make annual equity awards under our LTIP at its first meeting of that year, which is usually held in January or February. This meeting is scheduled approximately six months in advance and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act).targeted to fall within the window period following the release of the company’s earnings for the fourth quarter of the previous year. To the extent the committee approves any out-of-cycle awards at other times during the year, such awards will be made during an open window period during which our executive officers and directors are permitted to trade company securities. The terms of our stock incentive plan provide that the exercise price of each stock option cannot be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date. Pursuant to the committee’s policies, for purposes of our stock incentive plan, the fair market value of our common stock will be determined by reference to the closing quoted per share sale price of our common stock on the grant date. In addition, our stock incentive plan permits the committee to delegate to appropriate personnel its authority to make awards to employees other than those subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Our current equity grant policy provides that each of our CEO, CFO and chief administrative officer has authority to make or modify grants to such employees, subject to the following conditions: no grant may relate to more than 20,000 shares of our common stock; such grants must be approved during an open window period and must be approved in writing by such officer, the grant date being the date of such written approval or such later date set forth in the grant instrument; the exercise price of any options granted may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant; and any such grants must be reported to the committee at its next meeting. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement41 Risks Arising from Compensation Policies and Practices After reviewingcompleting the annual review of the company’s compensation program, management and our committee believe that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees, including our executive officers, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. In reaching this conclusion, we have taken into account the purpose and structure of these programs and the following design elements of our compensation programs and policies: our balance and amount of annual and long-term compensation elements at the executive and management levels; our selection of performance metrics under our annual and long-term programs that focus our executives and management level employees on the critical elements of our strategic plans, which in turn drive performance; the multi-year vesting of equity awards and three-year performance period of our PSUs that promote focus on the long-term financial performance of our company; and bonus arrangements for most employees that are not guaranteed and are ultimately at the discretion of either our committee (for our executive officers and senior management) or senior management (for other employees). These features, as well as therisk mitigation features such as our clawback policy and stock ownership requirements applicable to our executive officers, result in a compensation program that aligns our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and does not promote excessive risk-taking on the part of our executives or other employees. Section 162(m)Tax Considerations Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation a company can deduct in any one year forThe committee considers certain executive officers. Until recent changes to the tax code, however, compensation that qualified as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) did not count against the $1 million deduction limit. The committee’s policy in the past has been to structure compensation awards that will be deductible where doing so will further the purposes ofimplications when designing our executive compensation programs. The committee considered it important to retain flexibility toprograms and certain specific awards. We generally design our compensation programs so that recognize a full range of criteria important to our success, even where compensation payable under the programs may not be fully deductible. 34    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement The “performance-based” exemption under Section 162(m) has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. Accordingly, compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to remuneration pursuant to written binding contracts in place as of November 2, 2017. Despite the compensation committee’s efforts to structure awards in a manner intended to be exempt from the Section 162(m) deduction limitation, no assuranceNEOs can be given that compensation originally designed to be deductible under Section  162(m) will qualify for available income tax deductions. However, the transition relief when paid.committee believes that stockholders’ interests may best be served by offering compensation that is not fully deductible, where appropriate, to attract, retain and motivate talented executives. Accordingly, the committee has discretion to authorize compensation that does not qualify for income tax deductibility. Compensation Committee Report The compensation committee of the board has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K, and based on such review and discussion, the compensation committee recommended to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.   Submitted by the Compensation Committee on April 1713, 2019:2021:   Dustan E. McCoy, Chair Frances Fragos Townsend   42Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement35 Executive Compensation Tables The table below shows the total compensation paid to or earned by our named executive officers. For a more detailed discussion of our executive compensation program, including recent changes to our program, see the section titledNEOs. See “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21.for more information. Summary Compensation Table     Name and   Principal Position   Year   Salary Bonus(1)   Stock Awards (1)(2)   Option Awards (2)(3)   Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (3)(4)   Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (4)(5)   All Other Compensation (5)(6)   Total   Richard C. Adkerson Vice Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer           2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 $ 613,333 1,600,000 1,600,000 $ 6,697,622 5,990,910 7,175,425             $1,600,0002,985,400 1,541,6671,923,650 1,250,0001,999,200 $3,000,000 2,400,000 2,145,600 $ 2,869,719 2,979,703 2,642,995 $ 554,807 847,986 860,815 $ 16,720,881 15,742,249 16,424,035 Kathleen L. Quirk President and Chief Financial Officer 2020 2019 2018 306,667 800,000 800,000 3,346,607 2,995,455 3,583,027 993,560 961,825 999,600 1,750,000 1,400,000 1,251,600             — —27,752 $1,000,00018,280             $7,175,42575,491 7,286,646120,613 6,874,440130,709             $1,999,2006,472,325 3,919,150 2,864,400 $2,145,600 2,704,800 1,385,000 $2,642,995 2,201,935 2,029,631 $860,815 741,839 579,195 $16,424,035 18,396,037 15,982,666 Kathleen L. Quirk Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2018 2017 2016 800,000 775,000 650,000 — — — 3,583,027 4,131,584 4,468,386 999,600 1,955,770 1,861,200 1,251,600 1,577,800 1,260,350 18,280 — — 130,709 111,668 69,637 6,305,645 6,783,216 8,551,822 8,309,573     Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV Former President and Chief Operating Officer – Americas             20182020 20172019 20162018             550,000 541,666 500,000 — — — 2,459,183 1,474,704 1,947,758 686,000 1,346,970 818,400 860,475 1,084,738 1,114,925 4,548 76,006 — 176,422 129,091 137,651 4,736,628 4,653,175 4,518,734 Michael J. Arnold (6) Former Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer 2018 2017 2016 550,000335,069 550,000 550,000             —2,059,080 —2,056,750 —2,459,183             2,459,183684,400 1,971,344659,885 3,780,942686,000             686,000— 1,346,970962,500 1,570,800860,475             860,475302,976 1,084,738114,303 1,066,4504,548             37,79899,431 —186,728 —176,422             1,480,1333,480,956 128,5684,530,166 95,790 6,073,589 5,081,620 7,063,9824,736,628     (1) 2020 salaries for Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk reflect the cash amounts actually paid, which represent significant year over year decreases in cash salary due to the executives’ 25% voluntary salary reductions effective May 1, 2020 through the remainder of 2020 and payout of 90% of the reduced amounts in the form of RSUs. The RSUs are reported in the “Stock Awards” column. (2) The amounts reported in the table for 20182020 reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs awarded on February 6, 2018,during 2020, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the RSUs was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date ($18.74). The PSUs represent a contingent right to receive shares of our common stock, with the final number of shares to be issued based on the level of the company’s achievement of cumulative ROI over a three-year performance period, subject to a “TSR modifier,” which may increase or decrease the payout by up to 25% of the target award based on our TSR relative to a peer group. The grant date fair value of the PSUs with respect to the cumulative ROI metric was determined by reference to the closing price of our common stock on the grant date ($18.74), and the TSR modifier was valued using a Monte-Carlo valuation model. The Monte-Carlo model utilizes multiple inputs to produce distributions of TSR for the company and each of the applicable peer companies to calculate the fair value of the TSR modifier component of each award. Specifically, for the 2018 awards, the simulation model applied a risk-free interest rate of 2.26% and an expected volatility assumption for the company’s stock price of 65.14%. The risk-free rate is assumed to equal the yield on an approximate three-year treasury bond on the grant date. Volatility is based on historical volatility for the approximate three-year period preceding the grant date. Using these assumptions, the TSR modifier component of the PSUs was valued at $1.868 per unit, which, when combined with the closing price of our common stock on the grant date ($18.74), resulted in a per unit value of $20.608, applied to a probable payout of 118%, which is reflected718, as described in the table.table below. The grant date value of the 20182020 PSUs for each of the NEOs assuming maximum payout of the PSUs, and based on the closing stock price on the date of grant, is as follows: for Mr. Adkerson – $8,981,145,$13,016,745, for Ms. Quirk – $4,490,573,$4,334,400, and for Mr. Conger – $3,078,045 and for Mr. Arnold – $3,078,045.$2,979,900.   (2)   Award   Type Grant Date Grant Date Fair Value per Unit Fair Value Determination and Assumptions   RSUs 02/04/20 $12.04 Based on grant date closing price   RSUs 05/15/20 $  8.48 Based on grant date closing price   PSUs 02/04/20 $12.48 Based on grant date closing prince, adjusted for the fair value of the ROI metric and the TSR modifier, as follows: • Fair value of ROI metric: $(0.20), representing an assumed probable payout of 98.4% • Fair value of TSR modifier: $0.64, determined using the Monte-Carlo valuation model with the following assumptions: • Risk-free interest rate of 1.36% (assumed to equal the yield on an approximate three-year treasury bond on the grant date) • Expected volatility for the company’s stock price of 41.95% (based on historical volatility for the approximate three-year period preceding the grant date.) (3) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the NEOs in the year reflected, determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model price, which was $7.84$4.72 per option in 2018.2020. For information relating to the assumptions made by us in valuing the option awards madestock options granted to our NEOs, refer to Notes 1 and 10 of our financial statements in our annual report on2020 Form10-K10-K. for the year ended December 31, 2018. For more information regarding options granted to the NEOs, see the section titledSee “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21.for more information.   36Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement43 (3)(4) Reflects the annual incentive award payments received under our AIP as approved by the compensation committee based on the achievement ofpre-established goals. See the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21 for more information.   (4)(5) Includes (a)Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value during 20182020 of Mr. Adkerson’s SERP benefit of $2,396,127 and Mr. Conger’s SRP benefit of $0 (reflecting a decrease of $124,417), and (b) earnings under the NQDC plan in excess of 120% of the applicable monthly long-term federal rate at the time the compensation committee established the formula, as follows: for Mr. Adkerson – $246,868, for Ms. Quirk – $18,280, for Mr. Conger – $4,548 and for Mr. Arnold – $37,798. As determined by the compensation committee in January 2009, the assets in the NQDC plan are treated as if invested to produce a rate of interest equal to the prime rate, as published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Report at the beginning of each month. The 2017 amount reflected in this column for Mr. Conger was not included in the Summary Compensation Table in our 2018 proxy statement, and Mr. Conger’s “Total” compensation for 2017 has been adjusted accordingly.benefit. See the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Retirement Benefit Programs” beginning on page 41 for more information.   (5)(6) The amounts reported for 2018, which reflect the incremental cost to the company,2020 are showndetailed in the table below and reflect (a) all perquisites and other personal benefits and (a)benefits; (b) amounts contributed by the company to defined contribution plans, which include amounts contributed to the ECAP and the nonqualified defined contribution plan; (b)(c) the dollar value of life insurance premiums paid by the company; and (c)(d) the dollar value of interest credited on dividend equivalents on outstanding RSUs (we discontinued crediting interest for awards granted after 2015). For Mr. Arnold, includes the value of equity-based awards that accelerated in connection with his retirement, which was effective December 31, 2018. See the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” table on page 46 for more information. The perquisites and other personal benefits reported in the table below include (a) personal financial and tax advice under the company’s executive services program, (b) for Mr. Adkerson, personal use of fractionally owned company aircraft, which includes the hourly operating rate, fuel costs and incidental fees directly related to the flight, and for Messrs.Mr. Conger, personal use of company owned aircraft, which includes fuel costs and Arnold,incidental fees directly related to the flight as well as spousal travel expenses includingpaid by the company, which includes commercial airline tickets and meals paid by the company in connection with the spouse accompanying the executive primarily for international business travel and the cost of one chartered flight to transport his spouse to a business event, and payment of accrued but unused vacation upon his retirement, (c) personal use of company facilities and other allocated personnel costs, (d) security services and use of company cars, which includes driver compensation and vehicle repair, maintenance, and fuel costs, (e) the company’s premium payments for personal excess liability insurance, and (f) the company’s premium payments for disability insurance. The amounts in the table reflect the incremental cost to the company. 20182020 All Other Compensation       Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits   Additional All Other Compensation   Name     Financial and Tax Advice     Aircraft Usage and Spousal Travel     Facilities and Personnel     Security and Cars     Personal Excess Liability Insurance Premiums     Disability Insurance Premiums         Plan Contributions     Life Insurance Premiums     Interest Credited on Dividend Equivalents     Retirement Benefits       Mr. Adkerson               $20,000                   $146,547                   $53,280                   $122,764                   $6,802                   $8,602                       $363,290                   $33,200                   $106,330                   —           Ms. Quirk               2,300                   —                   —                   —                   3,337                   8,402                       116,670                   —                   —                   —           Mr. Conger               15,000                   67,331                   —                   —                   3,337                   9,323                       81,431                   —                   —                   —           Mr. Arnold               20,447                   20,952                   —                   —                   3,255                   6,078                             80,868                   —                   —                   $1,348,533       (6) Mr. Arnold retired from his positions as executive vice president and chief administrative officer of the company effective as of December 31, 2018.     Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits   Additional All Other Compensation   Name     Financial and Tax Advice     Aircraft Usage and Spousal Travel     Facilities and Personnel     Security and Cars     Personal Excess Liability Insurance Premiums     Disability Insurance Premiums         Plan Contributions     Life Insurance Premiums     Interest Credited on Dividend Equivalents     Payment of PTO on Retirement         Mr. Adkerson         $     20,000             $     25,390             $     41,023             $     116,758             $     8,377             $     8,602                 $     199,175             $     39,300             $     96,182                   —           Ms. Quirk               2,300                   —                   —                   —                   4,039                   8,402                       60,750                   —                   —                   —           Mr. Conger           10,000             601             —             —             4,039             6,215                       46,979             —             —         $   31,597     44Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement37 20182020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards     Name   Grant Date     Estimated Future Payouts UnderNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)     Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)     All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (3)     All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (4)     Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards (5)     Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards     Threshold     Target     Maximum     Threshold     Target     Maximum     Richard C. Adkerson AIP LTI ProgramLTIP – PSUs LTI ProgramLTIP – Options LTI ProgramLTIP – RSUs RSUs in lieu of salary     02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 05/15/2020             $1,200,000 — — — —             $2,400,000 — — — —             $4,200,000 — — — —             — 53,250120,125 — — —             — 213,000480,500 — — —             — 479,2501,081,125 — — —             — — — 106,500— 82,663             — — 255,000632,500 — —             — — $18.7412.04 — —             — $5,179,6155,996,640 1,999,2002,985,400 1,995,810— 700,982           Kathleen L. Quirk AIP LTI ProgramLTIP – PSUs LTI ProgramLTIP – Options LTI ProgramLTIP – RSUs RSUs in lieu of salary     02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 05/15/2020             700,000 — — — —             1,400,000 — — — —             2,450,000 — — — —             — 26,62540,000 — — —             — 106,500160,000 — — —             — 239,625360,000 — — —             — — — 53,00083,000 41,331             — — 127,500210,500 — —             — — 18.7412.04 — —             — 2,589,8071,996,800 999,600993,560 993,220999,320 350,487           Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV AIP LTI ProgramLTIP – PSUs LTI ProgramLTIP – Options LTI ProgramLTIP – RSUs     02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 02/06/201804/2020 02/06/2018 481,250 — — 962,500 — — 1,684,375 — — — 18,250 — — — 73,000 — — 164,250 — — — — 36,500 — — 87,500 — — 18.74 — 1,775,173 686,000 684,010 Michael J. Arnold AIP LTI Program – PSUs LTI Program – Options LTI Program – RSUs 02/06/2018 02/06/2018 02/06/2018 02/06/201804/2020             481,250 — — —             962,500 — — —             1,684,375 — — —             — 18,25027,500 — —             — 73,000110,000 — —             — 164,250247,500 — —             — — — 36,50057,000             — — 87,500145,000 —             — — 18.7412.04 —             — 1,775,1731,372,800 686,000684,400 684,010686,280           (1) For 2018,2020, under the AIP, each executiveNEO had a target award based on a multiple of salary, with the amount to be earned based on the company’s performance relative to defined goals established by the compensation committee. The amounts reported represent the estimated threshold, target and maximum possible annual cash incentive payments that could have been received by each NEO pursuant to the AIP for 2018.2020. The estimated amounts in the “Target” column were approved by the compensation committee and reflect 150% of base salary for Mr. Adkerson and 175% of base salary for each of Ms. Quirk and Messrs.Mr. Conger, and Arnold.based on salaries approved in February 2020. Achievement of the threshold level of performance would result in a payout of 50% of the target award, and a maximum performance would result in a payout of 175% of target. For more information, see the section titledSee “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21.for more information.   (2) These awards represent PSUs awarded as part of our 2018 LTI program. Each of the NEOs received 50% of their 2018 target LTI program award in the form of PSUs based on estimated grant date fair values as of February 6, 2018.2020 LTIP. Each PSU granted in 20182020 represents a contingent right to receive shares of our common stock, with the final number of shares to be issued to our NEOs based on the company’s level of achievement of a cumulative ROI metric and on our TSR compared to the TSR of our peer group during the three-year period ending on December 31, 2020.2022. For the 20182020 PSU awards, the executives mayNEOs will receive between 25%0% and 225% of the target PSU award based on achievement of the applicable performance goals. For more information regarding PSUs granted to the NEOs, see the section titledSee “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21.for more information.   (3) These awards represent RSUs awarded as part of our 2018 LTI program. Each2020 LTIP and, for Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk, RSUs awarded in lieu of the NEOs received 25%a portion of their 2018 target LTI program award in the form of RSUs based on the estimated grant date fair value as of February 6, 2018.2020 salaries. See “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information.   (4) These awards represent stock options awarded as part of our 2018 LTI program. Each of the NEOs received 25% of their 2018 LTI program award in the form of options based on the estimated grant date fair value as of February 6, 2018.2020 LTIP.   (5) The exercise price of eachthe stock option reflected in this tableoptions granted by the company was determined by reference to the closing quoted per share sale price of our common stock on the composite tape for NYSE-listed stocks on the grant date.   38Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement45 Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20182020       Option Awards         Stock Awards   Option Awards       Stock Awards Name   Option Grant Date   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (1)   Option Exercise Price (2)   Option Expiration Date       Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (3)   Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (4)   Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (5)     Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (4)(5)   Option Grant Date   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (1)   Option Exercise Price (2)   Option Expiration Date       Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (3)   Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (4)   Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (5)     Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (4) Richard C. Adkerson         02/02/09           162,000           —           11.930           02/02/19             234,500       $   2,417,695           1,134,000       $   11,196,660       02/07/11 02/08/11 02/06/12 02/06/12 01/29/13 02/04/14 02/03/15 02/07/17 02/06/18 02/05/19 02/04/20     135,000 500,000 135,000 330,000 450,000 335,000 580,000 386,250 170,000 131,667 —     — — — — — — — 128,750 85,000 263,333 632,500     $31.950 55.640 24.080 46.730 35.010 30.940 18.980 15.520 18.740 11.870 12.040     02/07/21 02/08/21 02/06/22 02/06/22 01/29/23 02/04/24 02/03/25 02/07/27 02/06/28 02/05/29 02/04/30       275,500   $ 7,168,510     1,092,580   $ 28,428,932     02/01/10     162,000     —     29.130     02/01/20               02/07/11     135,000     —     31.950     02/07/21               02/06/12     135,000     —     24.080     02/06/22               02/02/09     250,000     —     12.295     02/02/19               02/02/10     1,000,000     —     36.255     02/02/20               02/08/11     500,000     —     55.640     02/08/21               02/06/12     330,000     —     46.730     02/06/22               01/29/13     450,000     —     35.010     01/29/23               02/04/14     335,000     —     30.940     02/04/24               02/03/15     435,000     145,000     18.980     02/03/25               02/02/16     542,500     542,500     4.350     02/02/26               02/07/17     128,750     386,250     15.520     02/07/27               02/06/18     —     255,000     18.740     02/06/28           Kathleen L. Quirk         02/02/09           40,500           —           11.930           02/02/19             181,000           1,866,110           624,500           6,116,923       02/07/11 02/08/11 02/06/12 02/06/12 01/29/13 02/04/14 02/03/15 02/07/17 02/06/18 02/05/19 02/04/20     40,500 150,000 40,500 110,000 150,000 220,000 380,000 192,750 85,000 65,834 —     — — — — — — — 64,250 42,500 131,666 210,500     31.950 55.640 24.080 46.730 35.010 30.940 18.980 15.520 18.740 11.870 12.040     02/07/21 02/08/21 02/06/22 02/06/22 01/29/23 02/04/24 02/03/25 02/07/27 02/06/28 02/05/29 02/04/30       284,667     7,407,035     466,040     12,126,361     02/01/10     40,500     —     29.130     02/01/20               02/07/11     40,500     —     31.950     02/07/21               02/06/12     40,500     —     24.080     02/06/22               02/02/09     300,000     —     12.295     02/02/19               02/02/10     300,000     —     36.255     02/02/20               02/08/11     150,000     —     55.640     02/08/21               02/06/12     110,000     —     46.730     02/06/22               01/29/13     150,000     —     35.010     01/29/23               02/04/14     220,000     —     30.940     02/04/24               02/03/15     285,000     95,000     18.980     02/03/25               02/02/16     352,500     352,500     4.350     02/02/26               02/07/17     64,250     192,750     15.520     02/07/27               02/06/18     —     127,500     18.740     02/06/28           Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV         02/02/09           23,000           —           12.295           02/02/19             36,500           376,315           331,000           3,272,394       02/08/11 02/06/12 01/29/13 02/04/14 02/03/15 02/07/17 02/06/18 02/05/19 02/04/20     50,000 65,000 65,000 37,500 75,000 177,000 87,500 90,333 48,334     — — — — — — — — —     55.640 46.730 35.010 30.940 18.980 15.520 18.740 11.870 12.040     02/08/21 02/06/22 01/29/23 09/01/23 09/01/23 09/01/23 09/01/23 09/01/23 09/01/23         —     —     320,180     8,331,084     02/02/10     100,000     —     36.255     02/02/20               02/08/11     50,000     —     55.640     02/08/21               02/06/12     65,000     —     46.730     02/06/22               01/29/13     65,000     —     35.010     01/29/23               02/04/14     37,500     —     30.940     02/04/24               02/03/15     56,250     18,750     18.980     02/03/25               02/02/16     77,500     155,000     4.350     02/02/26     ��           02/07/17     44,250     132,750     15.520     02/07/27               02/06/18     —     87,500     18.740     02/06/28           Michael J. Arnold         02/02/09           180,000           —           12.295           02/02/19             68,500           706,235           491,000           4,790,026       02/02/10     240,000     —     36.255     02/02/20               02/08/11     120,000     —     55.640     02/08/21               02/06/12     100,000     —     46.730     02/06/22               01/29/13     135,000     —     35.010     01/29/23               02/04/14     185,000     —     30.940     02/04/24               02/03/15     240,000     80,000     18.980     02/03/25               02/02/16     297,500     297,500     4.350     02/02/26               02/07/17     44,250     132,750     15.520     02/07/27               02/06/18     —     87,500     18.740     02/06/28                       (1) The stock options granted prior to 2018 become exercisable in 25% annual increments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant and have a term of 10 years. Beginning with grants in 2018, the stock options become exercisable in 33% annual increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement39 have a term of 10 years. The unvested stock options will become immediately exercisable if there is a qualifying termination of employment following a change ofin control.   (2) The exercise price of the stock options granted by the company was determined by reference to the closing price of our common stock on the grant date.   (3) Represents time-vested RSUs, held by the NEOs, as set forth in the table below, which will vest and be paid out in shares of our common stock, as set forth in the table below, provided the applicable service conditions are satisfied.   Name    RSUs    Vesting Date Date  Mr. Adkerson      35,500 02/15/19  219,500        35,500 02/15/21   02/15/20  35,500 02/15/21         128,00056,000        02/15/2122       Ms. Quirk          17,667201,334   02/15/19  17,666 02/15/20  17,667 02/15/21  128,000 02/15/21  Mr. Conger          12,16702/15/21   02/15/19       12,166 02/15/20  12,167 02/15/21  Mr. Arnold 12,167 02/15/19  55,666        12,166 02/15/22   02/15/20  12,167 02/15/21         27,667 32,000   02/15/21  23   46    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement (4) The market value of the unvested RSUs and PSUs reflected in this table was based on the $10.31$26.02 closing market price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018.2020.   (5) Represents target PSUs held by the NEOs, as set forth in the table below. The PSUs will vest following the end of the applicable performance period and be paid out in shares of our common stock based on satisfaction of the applicable performance goals. With respect to the 2016 and 2017 PSU awards, the executives will earn between 0% and 175% of the target PSU award based on the company’s achievement of annual operational and financial metrics and up to an additional 25% of the target PSU award based on the company’s TSR compared to the TSR of the company’s peer group. With respect to the 2018 PSU awards, the executivesThe NEOs will earn between 0% and 225% of the target PSU award based on the company’s average ROI and its relative TSR compared to the TSR of the company’s peer group over the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2020. Accordingly, theperiod. The number of units reported in the table above represent the target number of all outstanding PSUs as of December 31, 2018, but the values reported reflect a 92.0%116% payout with respect to the 20162018 PSU awards and a payout at the target amount with respect to the 20172019 and 20182020 PSU awards. In addition, Mr. Adkerson’s total includes 64,000 performance-based RSUs, which vest upon satisfaction of a performance condition, provided such performance occurs before February 7, 2022. The compensation committee certified that this condition was met and these performance-based RSUs were paid out in February 2019.   40    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement Name Name   Grant Date     PSUs     Last Day of  Performance  Period      Threshold*   Target   Maximum   Mr. Adkerson           3/30/2016             n/a             600,000             1,200,000             12/31/18   **       2/7/2017       n/a       257,000       514,000       12/31/19       2/6/2018       53,250       213,000       479,250       12/31/20   Ms. Quirk           3/30/2016             n/a             390,000             780,000             12/31/18   **       2/7/2017       n/a       128,000       256,000       12/31/19       2/6/2018       26,625       106,500       239,625       12/31/20   Mr. Conger           3/30/2016             n/a             170,000             340,000             12/31/18   **       2/7/2017       n/a       88,000       176,000       12/31/19       2/6/2018       18,250       73,000       164,250       12/31/20   Mr. Arnold           3/30/2016             n/a             330,000             660,000             12/31/18   **       2/7/2017       n/a       88,000       176,000       12/31/19         2/6/2018       18,250       73,000       164,250       12/31/20   Grant Date PSUs Last Day of   Performance   Period   Threshold(*) For the 2016 and 2017 PSU awards, eachTarget Maximum Mr. Adkerson 2/6/2018 2/5/2019 2/4/2020 53,250 91,250 120,125 213,000 365,000 480,500 479,250 821,250 1,081,125 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22 (**) Ms. Quirk 2/6/2018 2/5/2019 2/4/2020 26,625 45,625 40,000 106,500 182,500 160,000 239,625 410,625 360,000 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22 (**) Mr. Conger 2/6/2018 2/5/2019 2/4/2020 18,250 31,375 27,500 73,000 125,500 110,000 164,250 282,375 247,500 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22 (**) (*)   Each executive may receive between 0% and 200%25% of the target PSU award based on achievement of the applicable performance goals, thus there was no determinable threshold. For the 2018 PSU awards, each executive may receive between 25% and 225% of the target PSU award based onthreshold achievement of the applicable performance goals.   (*** ) In February 2019,2021, the compensation committee certified a 92.0%116% payout with respect to the 20162018 PSU awards. 20182020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested        Stock Awards (1)    Option Awards        Stock Awards Name    Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting    Value   Realized on   Vesting (2)      Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise    Value   Realized on   Exercise        Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (1)    Value   Realized on   Vesting Richard C. Adkerson        —        —          1,085,000        $22,434,538          394,926        $5,928,838 Kathleen L. Quirk        —        —          705,000        14,702,226          196,949        2,958,207 Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV        5,000      $ 95,600          77,500        1,013,902          157,258        3,050,265 Michael J. Arnold        —          —     (1) No options were exercised during 2018. (2) The value realizedFor Mr. Conger, includes 50,333 RSUs that vested in connection with his retirement on vestingSeptember 1, 2020, the receipt of RSUs is basedwhich was deferred and paid out on the closing sale price on the date of vesting of the RSUs or, if there were no reported sales on such date, on the last preceding date on which any reported sale occurred.March 1, 2021. Retirement Benefit Programs Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan. We maintain an unfunded NQDC plan, for the benefit of our executive officers, as well as others. The NQDC plan provides those employees whose earnings in a prior year were in excess of the dollar limit under Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code the ability to defer up to 20% of their base salary after deferrals to the ECAP (ourtax-qualified defined contribution plan or 401(k) plan) have ceased due to qualified plan limits. The company makes a matching contribution equal to each participant’s deferrals in this NQDC plan and the ECAP limited to 5% of the participant’s base salary. In addition, the company also makes enhanced contributions equal to 5% of eligible compensation (base salary plus 50% of annual incentive awards) in excess of qualified plan limits for each eligible employee, with employees who met certain age and service requirements in 2000 (including Mr. Adkerson) receiving an additional 5% contribution. Employer contributions (both matching and enhanced contributions) were suspended from June through December 2020 and resumed in January 2021. Distribution is made in a lump sum as soon as practicable or if timely elected by the participant, on January 1st of the year following retirement, but no earlier than the date allowable under law following separation from service. The table below sets forth the balances under our NQDC plan as of December 31, 20182020 for each named executive officer.NEO.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    4147 Deferred Restricted Stock Units. In connection with the termination of his employment agreement in December 2013, Mr. Adkerson received 1,000,000 RSUs. These RSUs, which represent the right to receive an equivalent number of shares of our common stock. The RSUs were vested at grant but payout of shares of our common stock is deferred until six months after Mr. Adkerson’s retirement. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation   Name   Plan   Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year (1)   Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year (2)   Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year (3)   Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions   Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End (4)     Plan   Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year (1)   Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year (2)   Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year (3)   Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions   Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End (4)   Richard C. Adkerson   NQDC plan     $119,500            $326,790            $1,443,191     —     $30,184,998      NQDC plan     $29,550            $161,675            $1,196,782     —     $33,632,263      Deferred RSUs     —            —            (6,343,958 )    —     12,616,042      Deferred RSUs     —            —            13,046,182     —     28,802,983    Kathleen L. Quirk   NQDC plan     55,500            89,170            104,712     —     2,247,515      NQDC plan     35,333            32,917            94,507     —     2,670,533    Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV   NQDC plan     13,750            53,931            26,039     —     576,335      NQDC plan     4,083            21,271            25,444     —     721,007    Michael J. Arnold   NQDC plan     25,000            53,368            220,726     —   4,629,643      (1) The amounts reflected in this column are included in the “Salary” column for each NEO for 20182020 reported in the “Summary Compensation Table.”   (2) The amounts reflected in this column are included in the “All Other Compensation” column for each NEO for 20182020 in the “Summary Compensation Table,” although the “Plan Contributions” reflected in footnote (5) to that table also include contributions to the company’s ECAP.   (3) The assets in the NQDC plan are treated as if invested to produce a rate of interest equal to the prime rate, as published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Report at the beginning of each month. For 2018,2020, that rate of interest was 4.5%4.75% during the period from January 1, 20182020 to March 21, 2018; 4.75%31, 2020 and 3.25% during the period from March 22, 2018 to June 13, 2018; 5.00% during the period from June 14, 2018 to September 26, 2018; 5.25% during the period from September 27, 2018 to December 19, 2018; and 5.5% during the period from December 20, 2018April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2018. A portion of the earnings reported for each NEO in this column are deemed preferential earnings and are included in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the Summary Compensation Table.2020. With respect to Mr. Adkerson’s deferred RSUs, the amount represents (a) the number of deferred RSUs multiplied by the change in the price of our common stock from December 29, 201731, 2019 ($18.96)13.12) to December 31, 20182020 ($10.31),26.02) of $12,900,000, and (b) accrued dividend equivalents and interest (calculated using the prime rate) on those RSUs of $2,306,042.$146,182.   (4) The following amounts reflected in this column were included in the 20172019 “Total” compensation for each NEO in the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Adkerson – $417,775,$779,753, Ms. Quirk – $132,834,$163,292, and Mr. Conger – $67,944 and Mr. Arnold – $78,886.$68,564. The following amounts reflected in this column were included in the 20162018 “Total” compensation for each NEO in the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Adkerson – $243,400,$693,158, Ms. Quirk – $77,450,$162,950 and Mr. Conger – $47,162 and Mr. Arnold – $57,950.$72,229. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan – Mr. Adkerson. In February 2004, we established an unfunded SERP for Mr. Adkerson. The compensation committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant at that time, approved the SERP, which was then recommended to and approved by the board. The SERP provides for benefits payable in the form of a 100% joint and survivor annuity, life annuity or an equivalent lump sum. Mr. Adkerson has elected to receive an equivalent lump sum payment. The annuity will equal a percentage of Mr. Adkerson’s highest average base pay for any three of the five calendar years immediately preceding Mr. Adkerson’s completion of 25 years of credited service, plus his average annual incentive awards for the same three years; provided that such average amount cannot exceed 200% of the average base pay. The percentage used in this calculation is 2% for each year of credited service for the company and its predecessor beginning in 1981, but capped at 25 years. Mr. Adkerson has attained 25 years of credited service and his annuity was fixed as of January 1st of the year in which he completed 25 years of credited service, and will only increase at retirement as a result of mortality and interest adjustments. 42    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement The SERP benefit is reduced by the value of all benefits from current and former retirement plans (qualified and nonqualified) sponsored by the company, by FM Services Company or by any predecessor employer (including our former parent company), except for benefits produced by accounts funded exclusively by deductions from the participant’s pay. The amount provided in the table below reflects these reductions. As of December 31, 2018,2020, Mr. Adkerson was 100% vested under the SERP and has elected to receive his SERP benefit in a lump sum.SERP. 48    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Supplemental Retirement Plan – Mr. Conger.Mr. Conger is a participant in the SRP, which is an unfunded, supplemental retirement plan that we assumed in 2007 in connection with our acquisition of Phelps Dodge Corporation. Benefit accruals under the SRP were frozen effective December 31, 2008. Benefits are payable in the form of a life annuity, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% joint and survivor annuity options, as specified by the participant. The benefit will be a monthly amount equal to the product of (1) the sum of 0.35% of the participant’s final average monthly compensation in excess of his social security benefit and (2) years of service as of December 31, 2008, the date the SRP was frozen, determined without applying the Internal Revenue Code compensation and annual addition limitations. The SRP benefit is reduced by the participant’s monthly retirement benefit under the qualified retirement plan. The SRP benefit is subject to a five-year cliff vesting schedule, and Mr. Conger is 100% vested under the SRP. Pension Benefits   Name   Plan Name     Number of Years Credited Service     Present Value of  Accumulated Benefit    Plan Name     Number of Years Credited Service   Payments During Last Fiscal Year   Present Value of Accumulated Benefit  Richard C. Adkerson   Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan     25 (1)      $37,231,375 (2)    Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan     25 (1)      —       $42,718,424(2)   Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV   Supplemental Retirement Plan     33     1,400,609 (3)    Supplemental Retirement Plan     33   $ 8,203     1,802,458(3)     (1) The years of credited service under the SERP isRepresents the participant’s years of service with the company and its predecessor, beginning in 1981, but capped at 25 years.   (2) The accrued benefit was fixed as of January 1st of the year Mr. Adkerson attained 25 years of credited service, but will continue to increase year to year due to actuarial increases based on (a) an assumed 6% interest component, and (b) a mortality adjustment based on the IRS mortality table (as published in Revenue Ruling2001-62) and defined under the SERP. These actuarial increases compensate for the fact that the benefit is expected to be paid over a shorter timeframe (i.e., life expectancy). The actuarially increased benefit is then present valued to reflect a lump sum payment.   (3) As of December 31, 2018,2020, the accrued benefit under the SRP was fixed (benefit accruals were frozen as of December 31, 2008), but the present value of the benefit will be adjusted from year to year resulting from the passage of time and from changes in actuarial assumptions. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the significant assumptions used in the actuarial valuation were a discount rate of 4.4%2.5% and the mortality table and mortality improvement scale assumptions. The mortality tables were based ondeveloped in a similar manner to the Society of Actuaries tables that were published in 2014, but adjusted to remove the projected mortality improvement after 2006 for purposes of applying an alternative projection of mortality improvement after that date.date, and further adjusted to reflect the company’s historical mortality experience.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    4349 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change ofin Control Executive Change in Control Severance Plan. In May 2020, the board, upon the recommendation of the compensation committee, adopted an updated executive change in control severance plan (the CIC Plan), replacing our prior plan adopted in 2004 and last amended in 2008. The CIC Plan provides severance benefits to those executive officers not covered under existing agreements (including Mr. Adkerson) and other key members of senior management. Under the CIC Plan, if a participant is terminated without cause or terminates for good reason during the two-year period following a change in control, he or she will be entitled to receive certain severance benefits. A participant’s severance benefits under the CIC Plan are based on the participant’s level, and for Mr. Adkerson include: a lump sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of his base salary plus his average bonus for the three full fiscal years preceding the termination; a prorated bonus based on his average bonus calculated in the year of termination and the number of days worked during the year of termination; and 18 months of health benefit continuation. Payment of the severance benefits is contingent on the participant signing a general waiver and release agreement. The CIC Plan may be amended or terminated by the board in its discretion and the compensation committee has the ability to add or remove participants under the CIC Plan, including executive officers; provided, however, that any such action that has the effect of reducing or eliminating a participant’s benefits under the CIC Plan is subject to limitations, including a 12-month delay in effectiveness. Under the CIC Plan, “cause” is generally defined as the participant’s (a) failure to perform substantially the participant’s duties with the company, (b) felony conviction or entering of a guilty plea or plea of no contest, or (c) gross negligence or willful misconduct that is materially injurious to the company, including its reputation or business. “Good reason” is generally defined as (a) material diminution in the title, position, authority, duties or responsibilities of the participant or the person to whom the participant reports, (b) the assignment of any duties inconsistent in any material respect with the participant’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities during the one-year period prior to the change in control, under the agreement, (c) failure to provide the participant with a total pay opportunity at least commensurate with the highest total pay opportunity available to the participant within the one-year period preceding the change in control, (d) failure by the company or its affiliates to comply with any of the provisions of the CIC Plan, (e) relocation of the participant’s principal office to a location more than 50 miles from his or her current office location or requiring business travel on a more extensive basis, or (f) failure of the company to require a successor to assume its obligations under the CIC Plan. See the footnotes to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table for more information. Employment Agreement—Ms. Quirk. As of December 31, 2018,2020, we had an employment agreement with Ms. Quirk, which was approved by our compensation committee and the board and which is described below. For additional information, see the section titledSee “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21.for more information. The employment agreement with Ms. Quirk provides for an annual base salary of at least $650,000 (her current annual base salary is $800,000),$1,000,000) and provides that she is eligible to participate in our AIP. Ms. Quirk continues to be eligible for all other benefits and compensation generally provided to our most senior executives. The term of the agreement continues through January 1st, with automaticone-year extensions unless prior written notice is given by the compensation committee that it does not wish to extend the agreement. In the event of a change ofin control, the agreement will expire three years following the change ofin control. The agreement also containsnon-competition,non-disclosure and other provisions intended to protect our interests if Ms. Quirk ceases to be employed by us. In addition to the post-employment benefits provided under the company’s retirement benefit programs described above, Ms. Quirk’s employment agreement entitles her to the following additional benefits. 50    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Severance Benefits. If, during the term of her employment agreement, we terminate Ms. Quirk’s employment without cause or she terminates employment for good reason, she will be entitled to the following:   payment of the amount of her base salary earned through the date of termination to the extent not previously paid and a pro rata annual incentive award for the year in which the termination of employment occurs, based on actual results under our AIP;   a cash payment equal to three times the sum of (a) her base salary plus (b) the average of the annual incentive awards paid to her for the immediately preceding three years;   continuation of insurance and welfare benefits for three years or until she accepts new employment, if earlier;   acceleration of the vesting and payout of all outstanding stock options and RSUs; and   under the PSU agreements, in the case of termination without cause, retention of outstanding PSUs, which will vest after the end of the applicable performance period based on the company’s achievement of the performance goal. Under Ms. Quirk’s employment agreement, “cause” is generally defined as her (a) failure to perform substantially the executive’s duties with the company, (b) material breach of her employment agreement, (c) felony conviction or entering of a guilty plea or plea of no contest, (d) unauthorized acts or omissions resulting in harm to the company, (e) commission of an act of dishonesty resulting in her enrichment at the expense of the company or (f) falsification of financial records. “Good reason” is generally defined as (a) any failure by the company to materially comply with any of the provisions of the employment agreement or (b) the assignment to Ms. Quirk of any duties inconsistent in any material respect with her position, authority, duties or responsibilities under the agreement. If Ms. Quirk’s employment terminates as a result of death, disability or retirement during the term of her employment agreement, she (or her estate, as applicable) will be entitled to receive the amount of her base salary earned through the termination date to the extent not previously paid, payment of a pro rata annual incentive award for the year of termination (based on actual results under our AIP) and, in the case of retirement, the continuation of insurance and welfare benefits for three years or until she accepts new employment, if earlier. As a condition to receipt of these severance benefits, Ms. Quirk must retain in confidence all confidential information known to her concerning our business for a period of five years after termination. Ms. Quirk has agreed not to compete with us for a period of six months after termination of employment. 44    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement Change ofin Control Severance Benefits. Ms. Quirk’s employment agreement provides that the terms and conditions of her employment (including position, compensation and benefits) will not be adversely changed until the third anniversary of the change ofin control. If Ms. Quirk is terminated without “cause,” as generally defined above, or if she terminates for “good reason” during the three-year period after a change ofin control, Ms. Quirk is generally entitled to receive the same payments and benefits that she would receive in the event of a similar termination under the employment agreement, described above, except that Ms. Quirk would receive a cash payment equal to three times the sum of her base salary plus the highest annual incentive award paid to her (rather than the average annual incentive award paid to her) for the immediately preceding three fiscal years. The term “good reason” includes the failure of the acquirer to provide the executive with substantially the same position, authority, duties and responsibilities held prior to the change ofin control, in addition to the reasons generally provided above. The confidentiality andnon-competition provisions continue to apply after a change ofin control. If employment terminates as a result of death, disability or retirement following a change ofin control, Ms. Quirk will receive the same benefits described above under “Severance Benefits” in the event of death, disability or retirement. Severance and Change of Control Benefits—Other NEOs. We currently do not have severance or change of control agreements with Messrs. Adkerson or Conger. Mr. Conger is a participant in the company’s executive change of control severance plan, which is available to certain senior executives of the company and provides benefits if a participant is terminated without cause or with good reason within two years following a change of control. Under this plan, Mr. Conger would be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the sum of his base salary plus the highest annual incentive award paid to him for the immediately preceding three fiscal years, and continuation of insurance and welfare benefits for one year. For additional information regarding the impact of retirement on the various awards, see the footnotes to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” table on pages 46 and 47. Equity-Based Incentive Awards—Impact of Termination of Employment and Change ofin Control. The terms of our outstanding equity-based incentive award agreements (which include options, PSUs, and RSUs) generally provide that the subject award will be forfeited if the award recipient terminates employment prior to the vesting of the award, except under certain circumstances described below. In addition, a change ofin control alone will not automatically result in an acceleration of the vesting of outstanding awards. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement51 Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, the following summarizes the effect of a termination of employment under certain scenarios on the outstanding equity-based incentives held by our NEOs:     •   Performance Share Units (PSUs)– Upon a recipient’s termination of employment due to death during the performance period of a PSU award, the award (and any related accrued dividend equivalents) will vest in full and pay out at the target level. If the termination of employment is due to disability, retirement or, at the discretion of the compensation committee, termination without cause, the award will not be forfeited nor accelerate, but will remain outstanding and vest following the end of the performance period, provided the applicable performance conditions are met. In the event of a change ofin control, outstanding PSUs will convert into an equivalent number of RSUs (at the target amount), which award (and any related accrued dividend equivalents) will vest on the earlier of the last day of the applicable performance period or the date the recipient is terminated without cause or terminates for good reason.     •   Stock Options – Upon a recipient’s termination due to disability or retirement, any unvested stock options scheduled to vest within one year will vest as of the termination of employment, and the holder will have the lesser of three years or the remaining term of the option to exercise. Upon a recipient’s death the option will vest in full if not previously vested. In connection with a change ofin control, any unvested options will vest in full if the recipient is terminated by the company without cause or terminates with good reason within one year of the change ofin control.     •   Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)– Upon a recipient’s termination due to death, any outstanding RSUs (and any related accrued dividend equivalents) will vest in full. If the termination is due to disability or retirement, any RSUs scheduled to vest within one year (and any related accrued dividend equivalents) will vest as of the termination of employment. In connection with a change ofin control, the RSUs (and any related accrued dividend equivalents) will vest in full if the recipient is terminated by the company without cause or terminates with good reason within one year of the change ofin control. With respect to the special RSU grants made to certain executive officers in February 2017, the RSUs will fully vest upon a recipient’s termination due to death, disability or retirement, and the performance RSUs will fully vest upon a recipient’s termination due to death or disability. Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement45 The letter agreement between the company and Mr. Adkerson in December 2013 provides that with respect to Mr. Adkerson’s equity-based incentive awards, he will receive retirement treatment as set forth in the applicable award agreement following any termination of employment, except a termination due to death or termination by the company for cause. No Excise TaxGross-Ups.We do not provide excise taxgross-up protections in any of our change ofin control arrangements with our executive officers. Under the CIC Plan and Ms. Quirk’s employment agreement, if any part of the payments or benefits received by Ms. Quirkthe executive in connection with a termination following a change ofin control constitutes an excess parachute payment under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, he or she will receive the greater of (a) the amount of such payments and benefits reduced so that none of the amount constitutes an excess parachute payment, net of income taxes, or (b) the amount of such payments and benefits, net of income taxes and net of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.     The following table quantifies the potential payments to our named executive officers under the contracts, arrangements or plans discussed above for various scenarios involving a change ofin control or termination of employment of each of our named executive officers. In addition to the benefits identified, our named executive officers would be entitled to receive the retirement and pension benefits described above under “Executive Officer Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Retirement Benefit Programs,” and outstanding vested stock options, which amounts are reflected in footnote (4) to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change ofin Control” table below. In accordance with SEC rules, the information below assumes a termination date of December 31, 2018,2020, and reflects the arrangements in effect at that time. We have used the closing price of our common stock of $10.31$26.02 on December 31, 2018,2020, as reported on the NYSE, for purposes of calculating the value of the unvested and accelerated options, RSUs and PSUs. For Mr. Arnold, who retired effective December 31, 2018, the table reflects the benefits accrued to him in connection with his retirement only. 52    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change ofin Control     Name   Lump Sum Payment   Options (Unvested and Accelerated) (1)   Restricted Stock Units (Unvested and Accelerated) (2)   Accumulated Dividends and Interest Payable on Accelerated RSUs   Performance Share Units (Unvested and Accelerated) (3)   Accumulated Dividends Payable on Accelerated PSUs   Health and Welfare Benefits   Total (4)     Richard C. Adkerson                                   •  Retirement/Termination – No Cause       n/a       $1,616,650       $1,685,685       $24,525       —       n/a       n/a     $ 3,326,860    •  Disability       n/a       1,616,650       2,345,525       34,125       —       n/a       n/a       3,996,300    •  Death       n/a       3,233,300       3,077,535       44,775       $4,845,700       $70,500           11,271,810    •  Qualifying Termination after Change of Control (5)           n/a             3,233,300             3,077,535             44,775             4,845,700             70,500             n/a             11,271,810          Kathleen L. Quirk                                       •  Retirement       n/a       1,050,450       1,501,823       21,850       —       n/a       $43,761       2,617,884    •  Disability       n/a       1,050,450       1,501,823       21,850       —       n/a       n/a       2,574,123    •  Death       n/a       2,100,900       1,866,110       27,150       2,417,695       35,175       n/a       6,447,030    •  Termination – Good Reason     $ 5,238,150       2,100,900       1,866,110       27,150       n/a       n/a       43,761       9,276,071    •  Termination – No Cause       5,238,150       2,100,900       1,866,110       27,150       n/a       n/a       43,761       9,276,071    •  Qualifying Termination after Change of Control (5)(6)           7,133,400             2,100,900             1,866,110             27,150             2,417,695             35,175             43,761             13,624,191          Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV                                       •  Retirement       n/a       461,900       125,438       1,825       —       n/a       n/a       589,163    •  Disability       n/a       461,900       125,438       1,825       —       n/a       n/a       589,163    •  Death       n/a       923,800       376,315       5,475       1,659,910       24,150       n/a       2,989,650    •  Termination – No Cause (7)       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a    •  Qualifying Termination after Change of Control (5)           1,664,925             923,800             376,315             5,475             1,659,910             24,150             27,077             4,681,652          Michael J. Arnold                                   •  Retirement           n/a             886,550             455,358             6,625             —             n/a             n/a             1,348,533      * “n/a” means that the benefit is not provided to the executive or the executive did not have any of the referenced awards as of December 31, 2018.   Name   Lump Sum Payment   Options (Unvested and Accelerated) (1)   Restricted Stock Units (Unvested and Accelerated) (2)   Accumulated Dividends and Interest Payable on Accelerated RSUs   Performance Share Units (Unvested and Accelerated) (3)   Accumulated Dividends Payable on Accelerated PSUs   Health and Welfare Benefits   Total (4)     Richard C. Adkerson                                   •  Retirement/Termination – Without      Cause       0       $6,781,194       $5,711,390       $76,600       0       0       0     $ 12,569,184   •  Disability       0       6,781,194       5,711,390       76,600       0       0       0       12,569,184   •  Death       0       14,539,187       7,168,510       87,800       $21,999,910       $73,000       0       43,868,407   •  Qualifying Termination after      Change in Control (5)       $   14,467,200             14,539,187             7,168,510             87,800             21,999,910             73,000         $   39,344             58,374,951         Kathleen L. Quirk                                   •  Retirement       0       2,896,497       5,238,702       63,867       0       0       70,622       8,269,688   •  Disability       0       2,896,497       5,238,702       63,867       0       0       0       8,199,066   •  Death       0       5,789,889       7,407,035       69,467       8,911,850       36,500       0       22,214,741   •  Termination – Good Reason       6,629,400       5,789,889       7,407,035       69,467       0       0       70,622       19,966,413   •  Termination – Without Cause       6,629,400       5,789,889       7,407,035       69,467       0       0       70,622       19,966,413   •  Qualifying Termination after      Change in Control (5)(6)           7,133,400             5,789,889             7,407,035             69,467             8,911,850             36,500             70,622             29,418,763       (1) The valuevalues of the accelerated options iswere determined by multiplying (a) the difference between the December 31, 20182020 closing price of our common stock and the applicable exercise price of each option, by (b) the number of unvested and accelerated options under each scenario.   46    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement (2) The values of the RSUs were determined by multiplying the December 31, 20182020 closing price of our common stock by the number of RSUs to be vested under each scenario. The values reflected for Mr. Adkerson include 64,000 performance-based RSUs, which vest upon satisfaction of a performance condition, provided such performance occurs before February 7, 2022. The compensation committee certified that this condition was met and these performance RSUs were paid out in February 2019.   (3) The values of the PSUs in connection with death or a qualifying termination after a change ofin control were determined by multiplying the December 31, 20182020 closing price of our common stock by the target number of PSUs with performance periods ending after December 31, 2018.2020. No value is reflected for awards of PSUs granted in 2017 and 2018 in the event of termination upon retirement, disability, or for Mr. Adkerson, termination with nowithout cause, because the PSU agreements do not provide for automatic vesting of outstanding PSUs and the related dividend equivalent credits in those circumstances. Instead, the awards will remain outstanding through the performance period and vest if the applicable performance conditions are met. For more information, seeSee the “Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2018”2020” table on page 39.for more information.   (4) In addition to the amounts reflected in this column, upon the occurrence of each event of termination listed in the table, each NEO would be entitled to the following additional benefits, as applicable: outstanding,in-the-money stock options that were vested at the time of termination, the executive’s aggregate balance in the NQDC planSECAP (as reflected on page 42)39), and, for Mr. Adkerson, and Mr. Conger, the present value of the executive’s supplemental retirement planhis SERP (as reflected on page 43)48). The aggregate value of these additional benefits for each of our NEOs, assuming a termination on December 31, 2018,2020, is as follows: Mr. Adkerson – $72,955,715,$90,635,083 and Ms. Quirk – $4,348,415 and Mr. Conger – $2,438,844.$8,998,529. These amounts do not include benefits under our ECAP or life insurance policies generally available to all employees. In addition to the standard life insurance policy generally available to employees, Mr. Adkerson has an executive life insurance policy providing for a death benefit of $1.5 million.   (5) With respect to our equity awards, the agreements provide for the benefits described in the table following a change ofin control only if the recipient is terminated without cause or terminated with good reason within one year after the change ofin control. The amounts stated in the rows titled “Qualifying Termination after Change ofin Control” assume the full vesting of all outstanding options and RSUs and full vesting and payout at target for PSUs granted in 2017 and 2018.PSUs.   (6) Pursuant to the terms of Ms. Quirk’s employment agreement, theThe total payments may be subject to reduction if such payments result in the imposition of an excise tax under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Conger’s Retirement.Mr. Conger retired effective September 1, 2020. As a result of his retirement, and pursuant to the terms of his outstanding equity awards: (a) vesting of 166,917 of his unvested stock options that were scheduled to vest within one year accelerated, and he has the lesser of three years or the remaining term of the option to exercise, (b) vesting of 50,333 of his unvested RSUs that were scheduled to vest within one year accelerated, and (c) his outstanding PSUs remained outstanding and will vest following the end of the applicable performance period if the performance conditions are met. Mr. Conger was also entitled to receive payment of accrued but unused vacation and retirement benefits under the company’s qualified and nonqualified retirement plans and programs, including those described under “Retirement Benefit Programs” above. (7) Mr. Conger is entitled to certain severance benefits in the event of his termination without cause under the company’s severance plan, which is generally available to certain eligible employees. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement53 CEO Pay Ratio As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, and Item 402(u) ofRegulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median employee and the annual total compensation of our CEO. We believe the pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) ofRegulation S-K. There has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements since the end of 2017 that we reasonably believe would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure. As a result, in accordance with applicable SEC rules, we intended to calculate our CEO pay ratio for 2018 using the same median employee used for our 2017 pay ratio calculation; however, the median employee identified for our 2017 calculation received a promotion in November of 2018. As a result, in accordance with the applicable SEC rules, we are calculating our CEO pay ratio for 2018 using another employee who had substantially similar compensation for 2017 to that of the employee used for our 2017 pay ratio calculation and whose compensation did not change in 2018. The process that we used in 2017 to identify our median employee is set forth below. As previously disclosed in our 2018 proxy statement, weWe identified the median employee by examining the total earnings for the nine-month period ending September 30, 20172020 for all individuals, excluding our CEO, who were employed by us and our consolidated subsidiaries on October 1, 2017,2020, whether employed on a full-time, part-time, seasonal or temporary basis, with the following adjustments:   Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement47 As of October 1, 2017,2020, our employee population consisted of 25,12425,151 individuals, with 43%44% of these individuals located in the U.S., 30%28% located in Indonesia, 19% located in Peru, and the remaining 8%9% located in other foreign jurisdictions. To reduce administrative costs and as permitted by SEC rules, we have excluded from the calculation each foreign jurisdiction where we employ 200 or less than 100 individuals, namely the employees in each of Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Finland, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. This adjustment resulted in the exclusion from the calculation of approximately 300500 total employees, representing approximately 1%2% of our employee population.   With respect to permanent employees hired after January 1, 2017,2020, we assumed for purposes of the calculation that those employees worked the full nine-monthtwelve-month period in 2017.2020.   With respect to employees in foreign jurisdictions, we applied a foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rate to the compensation paid in foreign currency based on an averagethe exchange rate for the period from July 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017.as of December 31, 2020. We did not make any cost of living adjustments.   Of the possible median employees, we selected the employee without atypical elements of pay in his or her earnings, such as disability payments or special earnings while on leave. We calculated annual total compensation for our median employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 36.Table.” The annual total compensation of our median employee (other than our CEO) for 20182020 was $75,158.$69,518. As disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table,” our CEO’s annual total compensation for 20182020 was $16,424,035.$16,720,881. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 219241 to 1. Given the different methodologies that various public companies use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.   4854    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT The audit committee is currently comprised of threefour directors. The board has determined that each member of the audit committee has no material relationship with the company and that each is independent and financially literate under the listing standards of the NYSE and under the SEC’s standards relating to independence of audit committees. The board has determined that Mr.each of Messrs. Ford and Stephens qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by the rules of the SEC. We, the audit committee, operate under a written charter approved by the committee and adopted by the board. Our primary function is to assist the board in fulfilling the board’s oversight responsibilities relating to (1) the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting, (2) the integrity of the company’s financial statements, (3) the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (4) the qualifications and independence of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and (5) the performance of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit firm. We are also responsible for reviewing and discussing with management, our internal audit firm and our independent registered public accounting firm, the company’s major financial risk exposures, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. We oversee the company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the board. Our responsibility is to monitor this process, but we are not responsible for (1) developing and consistently applying the company’s accounting principles and practices, preparing and maintaining the integrity of the company’s financial statements and maintaining an appropriate system of internal controls; or (2) auditing the company’s financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and reviewing the company’s unaudited interim financial statements. Those are the responsibilities of management and the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, respectively. During 2018,2020, management assessed the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal control over financial reporting in connection with the company’s compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We reviewed and discussed with management, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the company’s internal audit firm (Deloitte & Touche), and Ernst & Young, LLP, the company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Ernst & Young), management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and Ernst & Young’s report on their audit of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, both of which are included in our annual report on2020 Form10-K10-K. for the year ended December 31, 2018. Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Financial Statement Review In February 2018,2020, in accordance with our charter, we appointed Ernst & Young as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2020. We have reviewed and discussed the company’s audited financial statements for the year 20182020 with management and Ernst & Young. Management represented to us that the audited financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of and for the periods presented in the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., and Ernst & Young provided an audit opinion to the same effect. We have received from Ernst & Young the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence,(PCAOB) regarding the company’s independent registered public accounting firm’saccountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and we have discussed with themErnst & Young their independence from the company and management.independence. We have also discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301 (formerly Auditing Standard No. 16) – Communications with Audit Committees (PCAOB Rel.No. 2012-004, August 15, 2012), effective pursuant to SEC ReleaseNo. 34-68453 (December 17, 2012), and Auditing Standard No. 2410 (formerly Auditing Standard No. 18) – Related Parties (PCAOB ReleaseNo. 2014-002, June 10, 2014), effective pursuant to SEC ReleaseNo. 34-73396 (October 21, 2014).the SEC.     Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement49 In addition, we have discussed with Ernst & Young the overall scope and plans for their audit, and have met with them and management to discuss the results of their examination, their understanding and evaluation of the company’s internal controls as they considered necessary to support their opinions on the financial statements and on the internal control over financial reporting for the year 2018,2020, and various factors affecting the overall quality of accounting principles applied in the company’s financial reporting. Ernst & Young also met with us without management being present to discuss these matters. In reliance on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the board, and the board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements referred to above in our annual report on2020 Form10-K10-K. for the year ended December 31, 2018. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement55 Internal Audit We also review the company’s internal audit function, including the selection and compensation of the company’s internal audit firm. In February 2018,2020, in accordance with our charter, we appointed Deloitte & Touche as the company’s internal audit firm for 2018.2020. We have discussed with Deloitte & Touche the scope of their audit plan, and have met with them to discuss the results of their reviews, their review of management’s documentation, testing and evaluation of the company’s system of internal control over financial reporting, any difficulties or disputes with management encountered during the course of their reviews and other matters relating to the internal audit process. The internal audit firm also met with us without management being present to discuss these matters.   Dated: April 17, 201913, 2021   John J. Stephens, Chair Gerald J. Ford Chair Lydia H. Kennard Dustan E. McCoy Lydia H. Kennard                INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Fees and Related Disclosures for Accounting Services The following table discloses the fees for professional services provided by Ernst & Young in each of the last two fiscal years:              2018              2017              2020              2019   Audit Fees (1)      $14,082,000        $11,995,000        $11,800,000        $12,751,000   Audit-Related Fees (2)      650,000        454,000        532,000        613,000   Tax Fees (3)      316,000        168,000        403,000        258,000   All Other Fees(4)      —        —        102,000        57,000     (1) Audit Fees were primarily for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the review of documents filed with the SEC, consents, comfort letters and financial accounting and reporting consultations, including matters relating to the PT-FI transaction completed in December 2018.consultations.   (2) Audit-Related Fees were primarily for professional services rendered in connection with the PT-FIvarious accounting consultations, transaction completed in December 2018related matters, and other attest services.   (3) Tax Fees were for professional services related to general tax consultation, transfer pricing, tax compliance and international tax matters. (4) All Other Fees were primarily for trainings and the use of Ernst & Young’s proprietary research tool. The audit committee has determined that the provision of the services described above is compatible with maintaining the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.   5056    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and Procedures The audit committee’s policy is topre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and permittednon-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with that policy, the committee annuallypre-approves a list of specific services and categories of services, including audit, audit-related, tax and other services, for the upcoming or current fiscal year, subject to specified cost levels. Any service that is not included in the approved list of services must be separatelypre-approved by the audit committee. In addition, if fees for any service exceed the amount that has beenpre-approved, then payment of additional fees for such service must be specificallypre-approved by the audit committee; however, any proposed service that has an anticipated or additional cost of no more than $30,000 may bepre-approved by the chair of the audit committee, provided that the total anticipated costs of all such projectspre-approved by the chair during any fiscal quarter does not exceed $60,000. At each regularly-scheduled audit committee meeting, management updates the committee on (1) the scope and anticipated cost of any serviceservices pre-approved by the chair since the last meeting of the committee and (2) thepre-approved fees for each service or group of services being provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Each service provided by our independent registered public accounting firm has been approved in advance by the audit committee, and none of those services required use of the de minimis exception topre-approval contained in the SEC’s rules. PROPOSAL NO. 2:    RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20192021 The audit committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the company’s financial statements. In February 2019,2021, the audit committee appointed Ernst & Young to serve as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.2021. Although stockholder ratification is not required, this appointment is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. The audit committeepre-approves the scope of all audit, audit-related, tax and permittednon-auditother services to be provided by Ernst & Young during the ensuing year and determines the appropriate funding to be provided by the company for payment of such services. The audit committee is also involved with the selection of the lead audit partner, who is limited to no more than five consecutive years in that role before the position must be rotated in accordance with SEC rules. Rotation of the audit partner occurred on January 1, 2019.for the 2019 audit. Ernst & Young has been retained as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm continuously since 2002. The audit committee and the board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young to serve as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the company and its stockholders. If stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the audit committee will reconsider the appointment although it may determine the independent registered public accounting firm should continue. Even if stockholders ratify the appointment, the audit committee may, in its discretion, appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it believes such appointment is in the best interests of the company and the stockholders. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present atattend our 20192021 annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Vote Required to Ratify the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm For 20192021 Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. For more information on the voting requirements, seeSee “Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials, Annual Meeting and Voting” on page 59.for more information. Board of Directors’ Recommendation on Proposal No. 2   THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019.2021.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    5157 PROPOSAL NO. 3:    ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The board is committed to excellence in governance and recognizes the interest our stockholders have in our executive compensation program. As part of that commitment and in accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our stockholders are being asked to approve an advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers, as reported in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as the“say-on-pay” proposal, is advisory, which means that the vote on executive compensation is not binding on the company, the board, or the compensation committee of the board. Nonetheless, the board takes this vote and the opinions of our stockholders seriously and the compensation committee will evaluate the outcome of this vote in making future compensation decisions with respect to our named executive officers. The vote on this resolution is intended to address the company’s overall compensation of our named executive officers and our compensation philosophy and practices, as described in this proxy statement. We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by voting in favor of the following resolution: RESOLVED, That the stockholders of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the company’s proxy statement for our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures provided in thissuch proxy statement. Input from our investors informed many of the changes to our executive compensation program implemented over the last several years. Some highlights of our executive compensation program and recent compensation committee actions include the following: Majority of our executives’ target direct compensation is at risk and requires measurable performance and increases in stock price under our annual and LTI programs. Payout of annual incentive awards for 2018 at 89.4% of target based on achievement of company performance metrics. Payout of 2016 PSUs in early 2019 at 92.0% of target based on achievement of company performance metrics. In direct response to stockholder feedback, we revised our LTI program in February 2018 to: Incorporate ROI as the primary metric of our PSU awards (representing 50% of the LTI awards), while maintaining the TSR modifier, and measure performance over a full three-year period. Deliver the time-based portion of the LTI program in equal values of stock options and RSUs (instead of all stock options). In considering how to vote on this proposal, we urge you to review the relevant disclosures in this proxy statement, particularly the section titled “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” which contains detailed information about our executive compensation program, including changes implemented over the last several years. We currently hold our“say-on-pay” advisory vote every year. Accordingly, the next“say-on-pay” vote will occur at our 20202022 annual meeting of stockholders. Vote Required to Approve, on an Advisory Basis, the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. For more information on the voting requirements, seeSee “Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials, Annual Meeting and Voting” on page 59.for more information. Board of Directors’ Recommendation on Proposal No. 3   THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.   5258    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS Our corporate governance guidelines provide that any transaction that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K of the rules and regulations of the SEC must be reviewed and approved, or ratified, by the audit committee or the disinterested members of the board. Any such related party transactions will only be approved or ratified if the audit committee or the disinterested members of the board determine that such transaction will not impair the involved person’s service to, and exercise of judgment on behalf of, the company, or otherwise create a conflict of interest that would be detrimental to the company. TheNo related party transactions described belowreportable under Item 404 of Regulation S-K have been reviewed and approved or ratified by the audit committee or the disinterested members of the board. In 2014, the Freeport-McMoRan Foundation (the Foundation) executed a gift agreement with the National World War II Museum, Inc., atax-exempt organization, pursuant to which the Foundation agreed to donate $4 million to the museum, payable in five equal installments of $800,000 per year beginning in 2014. Richard C. Adkerson, our vice chairman of the board, president and chief executive officer, serves on the Board of Trustees of the National World War II Museum. The final installment under this gift agreement was paid in 2018. Michael J. Arnold retired from his positions as executive vice president and chief administrative officer of the company effective December 31, 2018. Following Mr. Arnold’s retirement, he and the company entered into a consulting agreement effectivetaken place since January 1, 2019, pursuant to which Mr. Arnold will provide consulting services to the company for a period of one year. In connection with the services being provided, Mr. Arnold will receive a monthly fee of $25,0002020, and reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Either party may terminate the consulting agreement at any time by providing 30 days’ notice to the other party.none are currently proposed. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Director Compensation Philosophy We use a combination of cash and equity-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the board. In setting director compensation, the board is guided by the following principles:   Compensation should fairly pay directors for work required in a company of our size and scope, and differentiate among directors where appropriate to reflect different levels of work and responsibilities;   A significant portion of the total compensation should be paid in common stock to align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders; Compensation should be in line with market practice to facilitate the attraction and retention of talented and diverse directors; and   The structure of the compensation program should be simple and transparent. Process of Setting Director Compensation The compensation committee has oversight of director compensation, including the authority to grant equity-based awards. The compensation committee conducts an annual review and assessment of all compensation, cash and equity-based, paid to ournon-management directors under our director compensation program in light of the principles set forth under “Director Compensation – Director Compensation Philosophy.” In December 2017,addition, the compensation committee engaged Pay Governance, the board’s independent compensation consultant, to conduct a market review ofnon-management director remuneration practices and evaluate the company’s program in light of the review. After this review, the compensation committee decided to maintain the company’s current director compensation program. The compensation committee will continue to seekseeks advice from the board’s independent compensation consultant at least every other year, or more often as needed, in connection with evaluating our director compensation program relative to relevant market data and formulating its recommendations to the full board. In December 2018,2020, the compensation committee again engaged Pay GovernanceFW Cook, the committee’s independent compensation consultant, to conduct a market review ofnon-management director remuneration practices and evaluate the company’s program in light of the review. FW Cook compared our practices to S&P 500 companies, its own large-company survey and a comparator group made up primarily of FCX’s peer companies. FW Cook reported that the company’s annual compensation for non-management directors (1) generally aligns with the median of market practice for similarly-sized companies and aligns with the 75th percentile of comparator companies, and (2) the average annual compensation per director was 7% above the median compensation among S&P 500 companies. After considering FW Cook’s report, the compensation committee determined not to make any changes to the program, which willhas been in place since July 1, 2019. As discussed on page 10, effective February 2, 2021, Mr. Ford stepped down as non-executive chairman and Mr. McCoy was appointed lead independent director. In light of this new leadership structure, the board approved a lead independent director fee of $50,000 to be presentedpaid in cash, effective as of the date of Mr. McCoy’s appointment. In addition to the compensation committee during 2019. In addition, under the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan,committee’s oversight, our stockholders have placed a limit on the cash and equity compensation that may be paid to anon-management director each year. Under the terms of the plan,2016 Stock Incentive Plan, an annual limit of $750,000 per calendar year applies to the sum of all cash, equity-based awards (calculating the value of any such awards based on the grant date fair value of such awards for financial reporting purposes), and other Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement53 compensation granted to eachnon-management director for services as a member of the board, although the maximum number of shares subject to equity-based awards that may be granted during a single fiscal year may not exceed $500,000 of such annual limit. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement59 Cash Compensation During 2018, eachWith the exception of the change to the lead independent director annual fee described above, the current cash compensation program for our non-management directordirectors has been in place since July 1, 2019. Under this program, our non-management directors received anthe following annual fee consisting of,fees, as applicable:applicable, during 2020: Board/Committee      Fee      Member      Chair Board      $75,000      $50,000* Audit        12,500      25,000 Compensation        10,000      20,000 Nominating and Corporate Governance          7,500      15,000 Corporate Responsibility          7,500      15,000   * Board/Committee Fee Member Chair Board Paid $125,000 $50,000 (*) Audit            — 25,000 Compensation            — 20,000 Governance            — 15,000 Corporate Responsibility            — 15,000 (*)   In 2020, paid in shares of our common stock. In addition, each director wasis reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending each board and committee meeting. Non-management directors may elect to exchange all or a portion of their annual fee for an equivalent number of shares of our common stock on the payment date, based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date preceding the payment date.Non-management directors may also elect to defer all or a portion of their annual fee, and such deferred amounts will accrue interest at a rate equal to the prime commercial lending rate announced from time to time by JPMorgan Chase (compounded quarterly), and shall be paid out at such time or times as directed by the participant. See footnote (1) to the “Director Compensation” table for details regarding participation in this program by ournon-management directors.more information. Mr. Adkerson does not receive any compensation for serving on our board.board, including in his capacity as the chairman. The compensation he receives for his service as an executive officer is reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table.” Equity-Based Compensation Under the equity-based component of our program in place during 2018,2020, ournon-management directors received annual equity awards payable solely in RSUs, with the number of RSUs granted determined by dividing $170,000 by the closing sale price of our common stock on June 1st, the grant date, or the previous trading day if no sales occur on that date, and rounding down to the nearest hundred shares. The RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Each RSU entitles the director to receive one share of our common stock upon vesting. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the RSUs on the same basis as dividends are paid on our common stock. The dividend equivalents are only paid upon vesting of the RSUs. In addition, in connection with an initial election to the board other than at an annual meeting, a director may receive a pro rata equity grant. On June 1, 2018,2020, eachnon-management director as of that date was granted 9,90018,200 RSUs. Frozen and Terminated Retirement Plan We previously adopted a retirement plan fornon-management directors pursuant to which directors who had reached age 65 would be entitled to receive a retirement benefit based on the annual director fees. In April 2008, we froze the benefit under this plan for our then existing directors and terminated the plan for any future directors. Under the plan, as revised, an eligible current director is entitled to an annual benefit up to a maximum of $40,000 (the prior level of annual director fees), depending on the number of years the retiree served as anon-management director for us or our predecessors. As of December 31, 2018,2020, only Messrs. Ford and McCoy are eligible to participate in the retirement plan and will receive an annual benefit of $40,000 upon retirement from the board. The benefitboard, which will be payable until the retiree’s death.   5460    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement Director Compensation Table The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by ournon-management directors during 2018.2020. Director Compensation   Name of Director(1)    Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1)      Stock Awards (2)(3)      Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (4)      All Other Compensation (5)      Total      Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (2)    Stock Awards (3)(4)    Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (5)    All Other Compensation (6)    Total Gerald J. Ford      $157,493        $169,488        $0        $     51        $327,032         $202,500      $169,988      $8,449          $     —      $380,937    Lydia H. Kennard      94,993        169,488        n/a        58        264,539         125,000      169,988      n/a        —      294,988    Andrew Langham (6)      23,125        n/a        n/a        —        23,125    Jon C. Madonna (7)      58,750        n/a        n/a        2,643        61,393    Courtney Mather (8)      87,500        169,488        n/a        —        256,988    Dustan E. McCoy      102,500        169,488        0        5,513        277,501         145,000      169,988      21,258      5,229      341,475    John J. Stephens      141,415      169,988      n/a        —      311,403    Frances Fragos Townsend      100,000        169,488        n/a        58        269,546         140,000      169,988      n/a          —      309,988      (1) During 2018,Table does not include Messrs. Abney and Dudley, who were appointed as directors in April 2021 and therefore did not receive any compensation from us during 2020. (2) Pursuant to previous elections, during 2020 each of Messrs. Ford and Mather elected to receiveStephens received an equivalent number of shares of our common stock in lieu of 100% of his annual fee, and Mr. Langham elected to receive an equivalent number of shares of our common stock in lieu of 50% of his annual fee and to defer 50% of his annual fee to be paid in one installment after his separation from the board.fee. The amounts reflected in this column include the fees used to purchase shares of our common stock and fees deferred by the directors. In addition, the $50,000 fee paid to Mr. Ford in connection with his service asnon-executive chairman of the board was paid in shares of our common stock.   (2)(3) On June 1, 2018,2020, eachnon-management director was granted 9,90018,200 RSUs. Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs, which are valued on the date of grant, or the previous trading day if no sales occur on that date, at the closing sale price per share of our common stock. On April 5, 2021, each of Messrs. Abney and Dudley received a pro-rata equity award of 700 RSUs upon their appointments to the board.   (3)(4) Beginning inSince June 2013, ournon-management directors receiveddirector annual equity awardsaward is payable solely in RSUs. The following table sets forth the total number of outstanding RSUs (including vested but deferred RSUs) and stock options held by eachnon-management director as of December 31, 2018:2020:   Name of Director    RSUs      Options      RSUs      Options   Gerald J. Ford      13,375        76,200        18,200        30,800   Lydia H. Kennard      13,375        —        18,200        —   Courtney Mather      24,700        —   Dustan E. McCoy      77,100        60,000        95,300        20,000   John J. Stephens      18,200        —   Frances Fragos Townsend      23,800        —        32,100        —     (4)(5) Amounts reflect a decreasean increase in the actuarial present value of each director’s accumulated benefit under the revised retirement plan as calculated in accordance with Item 402 of RegulationS-KS-K. as follows: Mr. Ford ($29,810) and Mr. McCoy ($37,950). As noted above, the director retirement plan was terminated in 2008 for any future directors.   Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement55 (5)(6) IncludesFor Mr. McCoy, includes (a) $4,095 of interest credited on dividend equivalents on unvesteddeferred RSUs during 20182020 (beginning with RSU grants in 2015, interest credits on dividend equivalents are no longer provided) and (b) $1,134 representing the dollar value of life insurance premiums and the related tax reimbursement paid by the company pursuant to an arrangement assumed in 2007 in connection with our acquisition of Phelps Dodge, as set forth in the table below. Name of Director    Interest Credited on Dividend Equivalents      Life Insurance Premium and Tax Paid   Gerald J. Ford      $     51           —     Lydia H. Kennard      58           —     Andrew Langham      —           —     Jon C. Madonna      2,157           $486     Courtney Mather      —           —     Dustan E. McCoy      4,823           690     Frances Fragos Townsend      58           —     (6) Mr. Langham resigned from the board effective March 5, 2018 following a decrease in the Icahn group’s share ownership. (7) Mr. Madonna passed away on May 30, 2018. (8) Mr. Mather resigned from the board effective March 12, 2019 following a decrease in the Icahn group’s share ownership. STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS We believe that it is important for our directors and executive officers to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We encourage stock accumulation through the grant of equity incentives to our directors and executive officers and through stock ownership guidelines applicable to our directors and executive officers. The table below shows the amount of our common stock beneficially owned as of April 15, 2019, by each of our directors, director nominees, our named executive officers and our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, all shares shown in the table below are held with sole voting and investment power. Name of Beneficial Owner    Number of Shares Not Subject to Exercisable Options or Vesting of RSUs    Number of Shares Subject to Exercisable Options (1)    Number of Shares Subject to Vesting of RSUs (1)    Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (2)     Percent of   Class (3) Richard C. Adkerson        2,141,126        4,783,250        1,000,000        7,924,376  (4)       * Michael J. Arnold        310,970        1,663,917        —        1,974,887  (5)       * Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV        179,549        665,167        —        844,716  (6)       * Gerald J. Ford        2,316,831        76,200        13,375        2,406,406  (7)       * Lydia H. Kennard        52,925        —        13,375        66,300       * Dustan E. McCoy        16,000        60,000        77,100        153,100       * Kathleen L. Quirk        623,436        2,131,250        —        2,754,686       * Frances Fragos Townsend        43,570        —        23,800        67,370       *                                                       Directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)**        5,373,437        7,715,867        1,127,650        14,216,954       * * Ownership is less than 1%. ** Excludes Mr. Arnold who retired from the company effective December 31, 2018. 56    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement (1) Reflects our common stock that could be acquired within sixty days of the record date upon the exercise of options, vesting of RSUs, and the termination of deferrals on previously vested RSUs. (2) In addition to the RSUs included in “Number of Shares Subject to Vesting of RSUs,” each beneficial owner holds the following unvested RSUs and unvested PSUs, which are not included in the table above because they do not vest within sixty days of the record date.   Name of Beneficial Owner   Number of Shares Subject to Unvested RSUs   Number of Shares Subject to Unvested PSUs (Target level)   Richard C. Adkerson       367,000       835,000   Michael J. Arnold       56,333       161,000   Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV       81,833     �� 286,500   Gerald J. Ford       —       —   Lydia H. Kennard       —       —   Dustan E. McCoy       —       —   Kathleen L. Quirk       247,333       417,000   Frances Fragos Townsend       —       —             Directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)*       696,166       1,538,500 * Excludes Mr. Arnold who retired from the company effective December 31, 2018. For more information regarding the RSUs and PSUs, see the sections titled “Director Compensation” and “Executive Officer Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the “2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table. (3) Based on 1,450,626,551 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 15, 2019. (4) Includes (a) 20,330 shares held in his individual retirement account (IRA); (b) 600,000 shares held in trusts and (c) 476,980 shares held in a foundation with respect to which Mr. Adkerson, as a member of the board of trustees, shares voting and investment power, but as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. Total number of shares beneficially owned includes the 1,000,000 shares underlying the RSUs awarded in December 2013, which Mr. Adkerson will receive six months after his retirement and which were fully vested at grant. (5) Includes 6,252 shares held through our ECAP, which is the company’stax-qualified defined contribution plan. (6) Includes 36,195 shares pledged, in accordance with the company’s policy, as collateral for a loan. (7) Includes (a) 20,000 shares held as trustee of a trust and (b) 2,000,000 shares held by Diamond Family Investments LP, which is controlled by Mr. Ford.Dodge.   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    5761 SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of their ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock with the SEC. Based solely upon our review of such reports and amendments thereto furnished to us during 2018 and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that during 2018, all required reports were timely filed with the SEC. STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS The table below shows persons known to us, as of April 15, 2019, to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock.   Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of   Outstanding Shares (1)   The Vanguard Group   100 Vanguard Boulevard   Malvern, PA 19355 158,790,299 (2) 10.95%   BlackRock, Inc.   55 East 52nd Street   New York, NY 10055 103,368,279 (3)   7.13% (1) Based on 1,450,626,551 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 15, 2019. (2) Based on Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019, by The Vanguard Group on its own behalf and on behalf of its subsidiaries identified therein, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018. The Schedule 13G/A reflects 156,785,602 shares held with sole dispositive power, 2,004,697 shares held with shared dispositive power, 1,660,935 shares held with sole voting power, and 431,447 shares held with shared voting power. (3) Based on Amendment No. 9 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 4, 2019, by BlackRock, Inc. on its own behalf and on behalf of its subsidiaries identified therein, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018. The Schedule 13G/A reflects 103,368,279 shares held with sole dispositive power and 91,419,295 shares held with sole voting power. 58    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS, ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING Why am I receiving these proxy materials? The board, on behalf of Freeport-McMoRan Inc., is soliciting your proxy to vote at our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders because you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on April 15, 2019,12, 2021, the record date for the annual meeting, and, therefore, are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. This proxy statement along with a proxy card or a voting instruction form and our 20182020 annual report, is being made available to our stockholders on or about April 25, 2019. We have made these materials available to you on the internet and, in some cases, we have delivered printed proxy materials to you.22, 2021. This proxy statement summarizes the information that you need to know in order to cast your vote atvote. Stockholders are encouraged to submit proxies and voting instructions in advance of the annual meeting. You do not needmeeting by internet or phone, or by signing, dating and returning a proxy card (if received by mail), as early as possible to attend the annual meeting in person to vote your shares of our common stock.avoid any possible delays. Why did I receive a notice of internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials? In accordance with the rules of the SEC, we are permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our 20182020 annual report, to stockholders by providing access to these documents on the internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless requested. Instead, the notice of internet availability of proxy materials provides instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials on the internet. The notice also provides instructions on how to submit your proxy and voting instructions via the internet. If you would like to receive a printed or email copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions provided in the notice to request the materials. If you are a stockholder of record and you previously requested to receive printed copies of proxy materials, we strongly encourage you to sign up for electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Opting to receive your proxy materials electronically will reduce the costs incurred by the company to print and mail your proxy materials, provide you with fast access to your proxy materials and help us further our sustainable practices. You can request to receive future proxy materials electronically by signing up at www.envisionreports.com/FCX. If you are a beneficial holder, please contact your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee for instruction on how to opt into electronic delivery of proxy materials. When and where will the annual meeting be held? Our 2019As a result of the continuing public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to prioritize the health and well-being of meeting participants, this year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders conducted exclusively via a live audio webcast, accessible at www.meetingcenter.io/290222756. Although no physical in-person meeting will be held, we have designed the format of our virtual annual meeting to ensure that our stockholders who join the virtual annual meeting will be afforded similar rights and opportunities to participate as they would at 10:an in-person meeting. The virtual annual meeting will begin promptly at 1:00 a.m.p.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday,Tuesday, June 12, 2019, at the Hotel du Pont located at 42 West 11th Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. You can obtain directions8, 2021. Online access to the Hotel du Pont online ataudio webcast will open 15 minutes prior to the hotel’s website athoteldupont.com/en/contact-en.html.start of the annual meeting. Stockholders are encouraged to access the annual meeting prior to the start time and allow ample time to log into the audio webcast and test their computer systems. How can I attendjoin and participate in the virtual annual meeting? Stockholders are encouraged to submit proxies and voting instructions in advance of the meeting by internet or phone, or by signing, dating and returning a proxy card (if received by mail), as early as possible to avoid any possible delays. All stockholders are entitled to join the virtual annual meeting; however, you are entitled to participate (meaning vote, view the list of stockholders of record and submit questions) at the annual meeting only if you were a stockholder of record of the company at the close of business on the record date, or if you were a beneficial owner as of the record date and you register in person?advance in accordance with the instructions below. 62    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement Stockholders of Record If you planwere a stockholder of record at the close of business on the record date (i.e., you hold your shares registered in your name through our transfer agent, Computershare), you can join and participate in the virtual annual meeting by accessing www.meetingcenter.io/290222756 and selecting “I have a Control Number.” Enter your control number shown on the notice of internet availability or proxy card (if received by mail) and the password, which is FCX2021. If you cannot locate your notice of internet availability or proxy card but would still like to attendjoin the annual meeting, in person, please bring proper identification and, ifyou can request your control number by contacting Computershare at 1-800-953-2493 on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 7, 2021, or you can join as a guest by selecting “I am a Guest.” Guest attendees will not be allowed to vote or submit questions at the annual meeting. Beneficial Owners If your shares of our common stock are held in “street name,” meaning a bank, broker, trustee or other nominee is the stockholder of record of your shares, please bring acceptable proof of ownership, which is either an account statementyou must register online in advance to join and participate in the virtual annual meeting. To register online in advance, you must first obtain a legal proxy from your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee. Note that it can take up to two weeks to obtain a letterlegal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee. Beneficial owners interested in participating in the annual meeting should follow the instructions from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee included with your voting instruction form or contact your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee to request a legal proxy. Once you have received a legal proxy from your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee, confirmingplease email a scan or image of the legal proxy to our transfer agent, Computershare, at legalproxy@computershare.com, with “Legal Proxy” noted in the subject line. Please note that the voting instruction form or notice regarding the availability of proxy materials you beneficially ownedreceived with respect to the annual meeting is not a legal proxy. If you do request a legal proxy from your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee, the issuance of the legal proxy will invalidate any prior voting instructions you have given and will prevent you from giving any further voting instructions to your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee to vote on your behalf. You will be responsible for voting your shares and will only be able to vote prior to or at the annual meeting as described above for “Stockholders of Record.” Requests for registration must be received by Computershare no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 3, 2021. Upon receipt of your valid legal proxy, Computershare will provide you with a control number by email. Once provided, you can join and participate in the virtual annual meeting by accessing www.meetingcenter.io/290222756 and selecting “I have a Control Number.” Enter the control number provided by Computershare and the password, which is FCX2021. If you do not have a legal proxy but would still like to join the annual meeting, you can join as a guest by selecting “I am a Guest.” Guest attendees will not be allowed to vote or submit questions at the annual meeting. Participants in our Employee Capital Accumulation Program (ECAP) If you hold shares of our common stock as a participant through our ECAP, which is the company’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan, you may only join the annual meeting as a guest by selecting “I am a Guest.” Guest attendees will not be allowed to vote or submit questions at the annual meeting. For information regarding how to vote if you are an ECAP participant, please see the question below titled “How do I vote?” How can I submit questions pertinent to meeting matters? You can submit questions pertinent to meeting matters at the virtual annual meeting only if you were a stockholder of record of the company at the close of business on the record date, Aprilor if you were a beneficial owner as of the record date and you registered in advance in accordance with the instructions in the question titled “How can I join and participate in the virtual annual meeting?” If you wish to submit a question, you may log into the virtual annual meeting website at www.meetingcenter.io/290222756 beginning 15 2019.minutes prior to the start of the annual meeting and submit questions online. You also will be able to submit questions during the annual meeting at any point prior to adjournment of the meeting. To submit a question, you will need your control number and the meeting password, which is FCX2021. Once past the login screen, click on the “messages” icon at the top of the screen to submit your question. Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement63 In accordance with the rules of order, a copy of which will be available on the virtual annual meeting website, only questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered. In the interest of fairness to all stockholders, the question and answer period will be limited to a total of twenty minutes and multiple questions submitted on the same topic will be summarized and responded to collectively. The chairman reserves the right to not address any questions that are repetitious, irrelevant to the company’s business, related to pending or threatened litigation, derogatory in nature, related to personal grievances or otherwise inappropriate. During the virtual annual meeting, we are committed to acknowledging each appropriate question in the order in which it was received. When submitting questions, stockholders should identify themselves and provide contact information in the event follow up is necessary. Each stockholder who submits a question will be identified before his or her question is answered. Any questions relevant to the business of the annual meeting that cannot be answered due to time constraints can be submitted to FCX Investor Relations at the following email address: ir@fmi.com. What if I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the virtual annual meeting? If you encounter technical difficulties accessing or during the virtual annual meeting, please go to support.vevent.com for common issues and questions, click on the “Help” link in the upper right hand corner during the audio webcast for information on the supported operating systems and browsers, or you may call Computershare at 1-888-724-2416 if you need additional assistance. What if I cannot join the virtual annual meeting? You do not need to join the virtual annual meeting to vote. Stockholders are encouraged to submit proxies and voting instructions in advance of the meeting by internet or phone, or by signing, dating and returning a proxy card (if received by mail) as early as possible to avoid any possible delays. A replay of the virtual annual meeting, including the questions answered during the meeting, will be available at fcx.com after the virtual annual meeting for a period of 30 days. Who is soliciting my proxy? The board, on behalf of Freeport-McMoRan Inc., is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of our common stock on all matters scheduled to come before our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders, whether or not you attendjoin and participate in person.the annual meeting. By completing, dating, signing and returning the proxy card or voting instruction form, or by submitting your proxy and voting instructions via the internet or phone, you are authorizing the proxy holders to vote your shares of our common stock at the annual meeting as you have instructed.Stockholders are encouraged to submit proxies and voting instructions in advance of the meeting by internet or phone, or by signing, dating and returning a proxy card (if received by mail) as early as possible to avoid any possible delays. On what matters will I be voting? How does the board recommend that I cast my vote? At our 20192021 annual meeting, you will be asked to: (1) elect fiveeach of the seven director nominees; (2) ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2021; and (3) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement59 The Boardboard unanimously recommends that you vote:   FOR allthe election of each of the director nominees;   FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2021; and   FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. 64    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement We do not expect any matters to be presented for action at our 20192021 annual meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement. However, by completing, dating, signing and returning a proxy card, or by submitting your proxy and voting instructions via the internet or phone, you will give to the persons named as proxies discretionary voting authority with respect to any other matter that may properly come before the annual meeting about which we did not have proper advance notice at least 45 days before the anniversary date on which we first sentas required by our proxy materials for the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders,by-laws, and they intend to vote on any such other matter in accordance with their best judgment. How many votes may I cast? You may cast one vote for every share of our common stock that you owned on April 15, 2019, the record date for the annual meeting. How many shares of common stock are eligible to be voted? As of April 15, 2019,12, 2021, the record date for our 20192021 annual meeting, we had 1,450,626,5511,464,599,416 shares of common stock outstanding, each of which entitles the holder to one vote. A list of stockholders of record as of the record date will be available for examination by stockholders on the meeting website during the meeting. Guests will not count toward quorum. How many shares of common stock must be present to hold the annual meeting? Under Delaware law and ourby-laws, the presence in person, including being deemed present in person by means of remote communication (i.e., virtually), or by proxy of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at our 2019 annual meeting. The inspector of election will determine whether a quorum is present at the annual meeting. If you are a beneficial owner (as defined below) of shares of our common stock and you do not instruct your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares on any of the proposals, andbut your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee submits a proxy or otherwise votes your shares with respect to your shares on a discretionary matter with respect to which discretionary voting is permitted,(i.e., ratification of auditors), your shares will be counted as present at the annual meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.exists; however, many banks, brokers, trustees and other nominees do not vote on discretionary items if voting instructions from the beneficial owner have not been received. Beneficial owners are encouraged to submit voting instructions to their banks, brokers, trustees and other nominees so that their shares are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. In addition, stockholders of record who are present at the annual meeting, including being deemed present in person by means of remote communication (i.e., virtually) by logging in to the annual meeting as a stockholder of record using your control numbers, or by proxy, will be counted as present at the annual meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, whether or not such holder abstains from voting on any or all of the proposals. How do I vote? Regardless of whether you plan to join the virtual annual meeting, please promptly submit your proxy and voting instructions by internet, phone or mail as described herein. Stockholders are encouraged to submit proxies and voting instructions in advance of the meeting by internet or phone, or by signing, dating and returning a proxy card (if received by mail), as early as possible to avoid any possible delays. Stockholders of Record If your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, Shareowner Services LLC, you are the stockholder of record of those shares and these proxy materials have been made available or mailed to you by us. You may submit your proxy and voting instructions by internet, by phone or by mail as further described below. Your proxy, whether submitted via the internet, phone or mail, authorizes each of Richard C. Adkerson, Kathleen L. Quirk, and Douglas N. Currault II and Monique A. Cenac as your proxies at our 20192021 annual meeting, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, to represent and vote your shares of our common stock as you directed, if applicable.     •   Submit Your Proxy and Voting Instructions via the Internet –envisionreports.com/FCX.FCX     –   Use the internetonline website provided to submit your proxy and voting instructions via the internet 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time)through the virtual annual meeting on Tuesday, June 11, 2019.8, 2021.     –   Please have your notice of internet availability or your proxy card (if received by mail) available and follow the instructions to obtainsubmit your recordsproxy and create an electronic ballot.voting instructions online. You will need to have the control number that appears on your notice of internet availability or your proxy card available when voting.available.   Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement65 Submit Your Proxy and Voting Instructions by Phone (within the U.S., U.S. territories and Canada) using the toll-free number listed on your proxy card (if received by mail).   60    Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement   –   TelephoneUse the toll-free number provided to submit your proxy and voting facilities will be availableinstructions by phone 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time)through the virtual annual meeting on Tuesday, June 11, 2019.8, 2021.     –   Please have your notice of internet availability or your proxy card (if received by mail) available and follow the instructions to submit your proxy and voting instructions by phone. You will need to have the control number that appears on your notice of internet availability or your proxy card available when voting.available.     •   Submit Your Proxy and Voting Instructions by Mail –If you have received printed materials, complete, date, sign and signdetach your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you submit your proxy and voting instructions via the internet or by phone, please do not mail your proxy card. The proxies will vote your shares of our common stock at the annual meeting as instructed, if applicable, by the latest dated proxy received from you, whether submitted via the internet or by phone or mail. You may alsoTo vote in person at the annual meeting.meeting, you will need your control number that appears on your notice of internet availability or your proxy card (if received by mail), along with the password FCX2021. For a discussion of the treatment of a properly completed,returned proxy card (if received by mail) that is signed and dated proxy card without voting instructions on any or all of the proposals, please see the question below titled“What happens if I don’t submit voting instructions for a proposal? What is discretionary voting? What is a brokernon-vote?” Beneficial Owners If your shares of our common stock are held in a stock brokerage account by a bank, broker, trustee, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee that is considered the stockholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares of our common stock via the internet or by phone if the bank, broker, trustee or other nominee offers these options or by completing, dating, signing and returning a voting instruction form. Your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee will send you instructions on how to submit your voting instructions for your shares of our common stock. For a discussion of the rules regarding the voting of shares held by beneficial owners, please see the question below titled“What happens if I don’t submit voting instructions for a proposal? What is discretionary voting? What is a brokernon-vote?” If you are a beneficial owner and you want to join and participate in the annual meeting, please see the question above titled “How can I join and participate in the virtual annual meeting?” for information on how to register in advance. Participants in our Employee Capital Accumulation ProgramECAP If you hold shares of our common stock through our ECAP, which is the company’stax-qualified defined contribution plan, you may only submit your voting instructions for your shares of our common stock by mail. Accordingly, please complete, date, sign and signdetach your voting instruction form and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided to you. Upon receipt of the executed voting instruction form by Computershare, the trustee will vote such shares of common stock as instructed by you. If no voting instructions are indicated on the voting instruction form or if the voting instruction form is not received by Computershare by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday, June 2, 2021, the trustee will not vote the shares of common stock held by the trustee for your account, unless the trustee determines that the failure to vote such shares will violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Because shares held by participants in our ECAP must be voted by the trustee, these shares may not be voted by you during the annual meeting; however, you can join the annual meeting as a guest. 66    Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement What happens if I don’t submit voting instructions for a proposal? What is discretionary voting? What is a brokernon-vote? If you are a stockholder of record and you properly submit a proxy orand voting instruction form byinstructions via the internet, by phone or by mail, your shares of our common stock will be voted as you specify. If you are a stockholder of record who returns a proxy card (if received by mail) properly signed and dated but you make no specifications on such proxy card, your shares of our common stock will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the board, as provided above. If you are a beneficial owner and you properly submit voting instructions to your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee holding shares of our common stock for you, your shares of our common stock will be voted as you specify. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide voting instructions to your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee holding shares of our common stock for you, your shares of our common stock will not be voted with respect to any proposal for which the stockholder of record does not have discretionary authority to vote. Rules of the NYSE determine whether proposals presented at stockholder meetings are “discretionary” or“non-discretionary.” If a proposal is determined to be non-discretionary, your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee is not permitted under NYSE rules to vote on the proposal without receiving voting instructions from you. If a proposal is determined to be discretionary, your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee is permitted under NYSE rules to vote on the proposal without receiving voting instructions from you. If a proposal is determined to benon-discretionary, your bank, broker, trustee oryou; however, many banks, brokers, trustees and other nominee isnominees do not permitted under NYSE rules to vote on the proposal without receivingdiscretionary items if voting instructions from you.the beneficial owner have not been received. A “brokernon-vote” occurs when a bank, broker, trustee or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner returns a valid proxy, but does not vote on a particular proposal because it does not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter and has not received voting instructions from the stockholderbeneficial owner for whom it is holding shares. UnderWhich proposals are considered “discretionary” and which are considered “non-discretionary”? The classification of each proposal as discretionary or non-discretionary under the applicable rules of the NYSE, the proposal relating to the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is a discretionary proposal. Accordingly, ifbelow. If you are a beneficial owner and you do Freeport-McMoRan|  2019 Proxy Statement61 not provide voting instructions on this proposal to your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee holding shares for you, your shares may still be voted with respect to the discretionary proposal (i.e. ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Underfirm); however, many banks, brokers, trustees and other nominees do not vote on discretionary items if voting instructions from the rules of the NYSE, the proposals relating to election of directors and the compensation of our named executive officers arenon-discretionary proposals. Accordingly, ifbeneficial owner have not been received. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide voting instructions on these proposals to your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee holding shares for you, your shares will not be voted with respect to those proposals. Without your voting instructions, a brokernon-vote will occur with respect to your shares on eachnon-discretionary proposal for which you have not provided voting instructions, if the shares are voted on any other proposal. Proposal Classification Under Applicable Rules   No. 1 Election of seven directors Non-discretionary   No. 2 Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021 Discretionary   No. 3 Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers Non-discretionary Freeport-McMoRan|  2021 Proxy Statement67 What vote will be required, and how will my votes be counted, to elect directors and to approve each of the other proposals discussed in this proxy statement?     Proposal    Voting Options   Vote Required to Adopt the Proposal   Effect of Abstentions   Effect of   “Broker Non-Votes”   No. 1: Election of seven directors    For, against or abstain onfor each nominee   Affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast*cast(*) for each director nominee                 No effect               No effect No. 2: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20192021    For, against or abstain   Affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon                 Treated as               votes against               N/A No. 3: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers    For, against or abstain   Affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon                 Treated as               votes against               No effect   *(*) In uncontested elections, our directors are elected by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast. In an uncontested election,cast, meaning any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election will be required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the board. In contested elections (where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), our directors are elected by a plurality of shares of our common stock voted, meaning that the director nominees who receive the most votes will be elected. In contested elections, stockholders may vote “for” or “withhold” voting authority for each director nominee, and selecting “withhold” with respect to one or more director nominees will have no effect on the election of such nominees. In addition, brokernon-votes will have no effect on the election of director nominees in contested elections. Can I revoke or change my voting instructions after I deliver my proxy? Yes. Your proxy, unless you are a participant in our ECAP, can be revoked or changed at any time before it is used to vote your shares of our common stock if you: (1) provide notice in writing to our corporate secretary before our 20192021 annual meeting, (2) if you timely provide to us another proxy with a later date, or (3) if you are present at the annual meeting and either vote in person or notify the corporate secretary in writing at the annual meeting of your wish to revoke your proxy.in accordance with the instructions contained in these proxy materials. Your attendance alone at the annual meeting will not be enough to revoke your proxy. Stockholders who are participants in our ECAP cannot vote at the annual meeting and must vote in accordance with instructions from the trustee. Subject to these qualifications, such participants may revoke or change their voting instructions by contacting the trustee; however, the voting instruction form, including any revocation or change to the voting instruction form, must be received by Computershare by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday, June 2, 2021.   6268    Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement Who pays for soliciting proxies? We pay all expenses incurred in connection with this solicitation of proxies to vote at our 20192021 annual meeting. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, New York 10022, for an estimated fee of $20,000, plus reimbursement of certain reasonable expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies and otherwise in connection with the annual meeting. We and our proxy solicitor will also request banks, brokers, trustees and other nominees holding shares of our common stock beneficially owned by others to send these proxy materials and the 20182020 annual report to, and obtain voting instructions from, the beneficial owners and will reimburse such stockholders of record for their reasonable expenses in so doing. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by phone, email and other electronic means, advertisements and personal solicitation by our directors, officers and employees. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or employees for such solicitation efforts. Could other matters be considered and voted upon at the annual meeting? The board does not expect to bring any other matter before our 20192021 annual meeting, and it is not aware of any other matter that may be considered at the annual meeting. In addition, pursuant to ourby-laws, the time has elapsed for any stockholder to properly bring a matter before the annual meeting. However, if any other matter does properly come before the annual meeting, each of the proxy holders will vote any shares of our common stock, for which he or she holds a proxy to vote at the annual meeting, in his or her discretion. What happens if the annual meeting is postponed or adjourned? Unless a new record date is fixed, your proxy will still be valid and may be used to vote shares of our common stock at the postponed or adjourned annual meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is used to vote your shares. Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting? We will report the voting results in a Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of our annual meeting, a copy of which will also be available on our website atfcx.com under “Investors – Financial Information – SEC Filings.” 20202022 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS If you would like us to consider including a proposal in next year’s proxy statement, you must comply with the requirements of the SEC and deliver it in writing to:Corporate Secretary, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004 by December 27, 2019.23, 2021. If you are an eligible stockholder, or group of stockholders, and would like us to consider including a proxy access director nomination in next year’s proxy statement, you must comply with the requirements of our proxy accessby-law and deliver the required notice and supporting materials in writing to:Corporate Secretary, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004 by December 27, 2019.23, 2021. If you would like to present a proposal or director candidate at the next annual meeting but do not wish to have it included in our proxy statement, you must comply with the specific procedural requirements in ourby-laws and deliver it in writing to:Corporate Secretary, Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 333 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004 by April 13, 2020.March 10, 2022. Failure to comply with ourby-law procedures and deadlines may preclude presentation of your proposal at our 20202022 annual meeting. If you would like a copy of the requirements or procedures described above, please contact our corporate secretary as provided above, or access ourby-laws on our website atfcx.com under “About Us – Corporate Governance –Governance Documents.”   Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy Statement    6369 ANNEX A Methodology Used to Calculate Certain AIP Metrics Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation Calculated in accordance with the covenant calculation in our bank credit facility: (in millions)      2018     Net income attributable to common stockholders – continuing operations    $ 2,617   Depreciation, depletion and amortization      1,754   Interest expense, net(1)      945   Provision for income taxes      991   Net gain on sales of assets      (208 )  Accretion expense      110   Stock-based compensation      76   Non-cash impact of commodity hedging program      20   Net gain on early extinguishment of debt      (7 )  Other net charges(2)      311   Pro forma adjustment forPT-FI divestment transaction(3)      310   Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests      292            Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(4) – Continuing Operations    $ 7,211 (5)           (in millions)      2020     Net income attributable to common stockholders    $ 599   Depreciation, depletion and amortization      1,528   Interest expense, net      598   Income tax provision      944   Metals inventory adjustments      96   Net gain on sales of assets      (507 )  Stock-based compensation and accretion      192   Non-cash impact of commodity hedging program      (12 )  Loss on early extinguishment of debt      101   Other net charges(1)      426   Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests      266            Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(2)    $ 4,231              (1) Includes interest of $370 millionPrimarily includes costs directly associated with disputed Cerro Verde royaltiesthe COVID-19 pandemic and related matters.revised operating plans, including employee separation costs ($241 million) and net charges for a talc-related litigation accrual, partly offset by net favorable adjustments to environmental obligations ($113 million).   (2) Primarily includesPT-FI charges of (i) $69 million for surface water tax disputes with the local regional tax authority in Papua, Indonesia, (ii) $32 million for assessments of prior period permit fees with Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry, (iii) $72 million for disputed payroll withholding taxes for prior years and other tax settlements, and (iv) $62 million towrite-off certain previously capitalized project costs for the new Indonesian smelter. Also includes $69 million for Cerro Verde’s new three-year Collective Labor Agreement. (3) Bank credit facility requires pro forma adjustment to reflect thePT-FI divestment transaction as if it had occurred on January 1, 2018. (4) Adjusted EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure that is frequently used by securities analysts, investors, lenders and others to evaluate companies’ performance, including, among other things, profitability before the effect of financing and similar decisions. Because securities analysts, investors, lenders and others use Adjusted EBITDA, management believes that our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA affords them greater transparency in assessing our financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a substitute for measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA may not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies, as differentother companies calculate such measures differently. Net Debt Calculation (5) In February 2019, the compensation committee reviewed consolidated Adjusted EBITDA totaling $7.17 billion, and thus approved payout of the 2018 AIP awards based on achievement of 89% of that metric. Subsequent to the compensation committee’s meeting, management identified an approximate $50 million inventory adjustment that should have only impacted the fourth-quarter Adjusted EBITDA calculation, but not the full-year 2018. Accordingly, that adjustment was removed from this final consolidated Adjusted EBITDA calculation, resulting in consolidated Adjusted EBITDA increasing to $7.21 billion for the year 2018 (which would have resulted in achievement of 90% of that metric under the 2018 AIP). No corresponding upward adjustment was made to the 2018 AIP awards for our executive officers. Calculated as long-term debt plus the current portion of debt (or total debt), less cash and cash equivalents, as reported in our annual report on Form 10-K. Consolidated Unit Net Cash Costs Calculation Determined using the “by-product” method, as reported in our annual report on Form 10-K. Under this method, gold, molybdenum and other metal revenues at copper mines are reflected as credits against site production and delivery costs. Our calculation excludes noncash and other costs, including stock-based compensation costs, start-up costs, inventory adjustments, long-lived asset impairments, restructuring and/or unusual charges.   A-1Freeport-McMoRan  |  20192021 Proxy StatementA-1 Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!submit your voting instructions! You may votesubmit your voting instructions online or by phone instead of mailing thisthe below proxy card. Proxies (whether submitted online, by phone, or by mail) must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on June 11, 2019. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/FCX or scan the QR code –— login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada. Mail Sign, date, detach and return the bottom portion in the enclosed envelope. Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 20192021 Annual Meeting Proxy Card IF1234 5678 9012 345 qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DATE, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q A Proposals –— The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 1 –2 and 3. For Against Abstain 1. Election of fiveseven directors. Nominees are: + For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our 01—Richard C. Adkerson+ independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.2021. For Against Abstain 02—Gerald J. FordFor Against Abstain 01—David P. Abney 3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. 02—Richard C. Adkerson 03—Robert W. Dudley 04—Lydia H. Kennard 04—05—Dustan E. McCoy 05—06—John J. Stephens 07—Frances Fragos Townsend B Authorized Signatures –— This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. Please date and sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) –— Please print date below. Signature 1 –— Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 –— Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MMMMMM 1UPX 499244 MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + 031BPE03ENJE Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders June 12, 20198, 2021 at 10:1:00 a.m.p.m. Eastern Time Hotel du Pont 42 West 11th Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 If you plan to attendThe 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be a virtual meeting of stockholders conducted exclusively via a live audio webcast, accessible at: www.meetingcenter.io/290222756 You can join and participate in the virtual annual meeting by accessing www.meetingcenter.io/290222756 and selecting “I have a Control Number.” Enter your control number that is in person, please presentthe shaded bar on the reverse side of this proxy card and your government issued identification upon arrival.the password, which is: FCX2021. If you encounter technical difficulties accessing or during the virtual annual meeting, please go to support.vevent.com for common issues and questions or click on the “Help” link in the upper right hand corner during the audio webcast for information on the supported operating systems and browsers. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 12, 2019.8, 2021. Proxy materials are available at: www.envisionreports.com/FCX Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up atat: www.envisionreports.com/FCX IFWe strongly encourage you to sign up for electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Opting to receive your proxy materials electronically will reduce the costs incurred by the company to print and mail your proxy materials, provide you with fast access to your proxy materials and help us further our sustainable practices. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DATE, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q + Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Notice of 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 12, 2019 The undersigned8, 2021 By signing the reverse side of this proxy card, you hereby appointsappoint Richard C. Adkerson, Kathleen L. Quirk, and Douglas N. Currault II and Monique A. Cenac, or any of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote the undersigned’syour shares of common stock of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at the virtual annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday,Tuesday, June 12, 2019,8, 2021, at 10:1:00 a.m.p.m., Eastern Time, via a live audio webcast, accessible at www.meetingcenter.io/290222756, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, at the Hotel du Pont located at 42 West 11th Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 on all matters coming before the virtual annual meeting. You can obtain directions to the Hotel du Pont on the hotel’s website atwww.hoteldupont.com/en/contact-en.html. The proxies will vote your shares as you specify on the backreverse side of this proxy card. On matters for which you do not specifymark a choice,box, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the boardBoard of directors;Directors; therefore, if no directionbox is made, this proxymarked for a particular matter, your shares will be voted, as applicable, FOR alleach of the director nominees in ItemProposal 1 and FOR ItemsProposals 2 and 3. For any other matter properly coming before the virtual annual meeting, the proxies will vote your shares as the proxies decide.in their discretion. If you wish your shares to be voted on all matters as the boardBoard of directorsDirectors recommends, simply sign, date, detach and return this proxy card. If you wish your shares to be voted as you specify on a matter or all matters, please also mark the appropriate box or boxes on the backreverse side of this proxy card. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) CNon-Voting Items Change of Address –— Please print new address below. Comments –— Please print your comments below. +